Skip to comments.
The Lancet study
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^
| Friday, November 5, 2004
| editorial
Posted on 11/05/2004 8:40:54 AM PST by Willie Green
The Lancet raced to get the study on the Web in advance of its print publication and five days before the election.
Coalition forces in Iraq are responsible for 100,000 civilian deaths since the war began, according to a survey.
Well, not quite. It could be 8,000 or 194,000, the statistical swath cut by the small number of interviews conducted in 33 "clusters." The hottest spot was at Fallujah, where two-thirds of the violent deaths were reported and where fighting has been intense.
Extrapolating anything from that is asinine.
(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: innocentcivilians; iraq; traitors
To: Willie Green
The Lancet. Wasn't that a much-respected medical publication ?
To: Atlantic Friend
This is akin to the AMA chiming-in on firearms issues...
3
posted on
11/05/2004 8:48:14 AM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(One John is unemployed and the other will soon get a pink slip)
To: Atlantic Friend
The Lancet. Wasn't that a much-respected medical publication ?I don't think there is such a thing as a "much-respected medical publication" anymore. They've become notorious for spewing left-wing propaganda that doesn't have anything to do with medicine or health.
To: Willie Green
.........................Chemlujah?
5
posted on
11/05/2004 8:50:53 AM PST
by
maestro
To: Willie Green
Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
6
posted on
11/05/2004 9:29:23 AM PST
by
SpinyNorman
(Stop the attempted coup d'etat by the liberal media! Vote Bush!! DONE!!!!)
To: Army Air Corps
There was a time when the editorial board of the Lancet produced a professional journal that was respected throughout the Western World for promoting the art and science of medicine for the betterment of the public health as to issues of epidemiology, the efficacy of medical treatment modalities, advancements in medical technology, new pharmacotherapy, issues in medical ethics, etc., but now elements of the current board have allowed the publication to become corrupted by a bogus political propaganda article, by authors who readily admit their bias, wherein a crude estimate based on absurdly questionable methodology suggests a wildly inflated number of non-combatant deaths, in numbers exponentially beyond reality, The journal tacitly admitted its agenda, and that the "findings" were an October Surprise, rushed to be pre-released online in hopes of swaying the 2004 Presidential election in the USofA. Shameful.
Really, the Lancet needs to stick with articles germane to medicine and avoid geo-politics, Such articles may be fodder for the fools of the left, but such corruption tarnishes and discredits the publication.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson