Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brits to America: You're Idiots!
Slate ^

Posted on 11/04/2004 5:44:29 PM PST by GulliverSwift

Brits to America: You're Idiots!
Well, 51 percent of you, anyway.

Americans who think post-election anti-red-state recrimination is a U.S.-only phenomenon should check out the cover of Thursday's Daily Mirror: Over a picture of President George W. Bush, the paper asked, "How can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB?" Inside, the left-leaning British tabloid headlined its editorial, "WAR MORE YEARS." In a clear demonstration of the trans-Atlantic culture gap, the paper's description of the president's beliefs—clearly intended to strike Mirror readers as a radical agenda—is simply an accurate, if crude, précis of his platform: "Mr Bush opposes abortion and gay marriage, doesn't give a stuff about the environment, is against gun control and believes troops should stay in Iraq for as long as it takes."

The Mirror wasn't the only British paper with a striking cover. The Guardian's "G2" section was fronted by a page of solid black containing just two small words: "Oh, God." Meanwhile, the Independent ran the headline "Four More Years" along with iconic images from the first Bush term: kneeling prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, tortured prisoners at Abu Ghraib, soldiers fighting in Iraq, oil-drilling machinery, sign-wielding religious extremists, and a smirking Dubya. In France, Libération ran a picture of the president under the headline, "L'Empire empire"—"The empire declines."

Many of the British commentaries followed a consistent formula: We wish the other guy had won, but Bush scored a convincing mandate this time around, so we have to live with it. As the Guardian put it: "We may not like it. In fact … we don't like it one bit. But if it isn't a mandate, then the word has no meaning. Mr. Bush has won fair … and square. He and his country—and the rest of the world—now have to deal with it." In a fit of double-negativity, the Independent's editorial added: "This does not mean, however, that we do not contemplate the second Bush term with considerable trepidation. Another four years of a president in thrall to the religious right and the neo-conservatives is another four years in which the United States risks sliding back into an earlier age of bigotry and social injustice." Writing in the Times of London, Simon Jenkins' condescending sigh of disappointment typified the genre:

Mr Bush's election will give the rest of the world a collective heart attack. It expected a Kerry win. At the very least it expected Americans to somehow rein in a man it sees as naïve and dangerously belligerent. … Americans declined to rein him in. They legitimised him. The rest of the world has been roundly snubbed.

An op-ed in the Guardian went to great lengths to describe negative stereotypes of the American electorate, then rejected them much less convincingly: "Americans are seen as unsophisticated, wilfully ignorant, obsessed with such issues as abortion, guns and gay marriage, and wedded to a device which seems calculated to impede the wishes of the majority—the electoral college. … Americans are far more complicated and unpredictable than we understand them to be."

The conservative press cheered Bush's victory. Rupert Murdoch's Sun said: "The world is a safer place today with George W Bush back in the Oval Office. His re-election is bad news for terrorists everywhere." The Daily Telegraph agreed: "The triumph of his Churchillian conservatism will … strike fear into all enemies of America and the west." The Telegraph's version of the "get used to it" theme was more positive: "[America] is diverging from Europe: it is younger, more self-confident, more prosperous, more devout, more diligent, more democratic and, in short, more conservative. Europe must come to terms, not only with Mr Bush, but with the nation that has elected him." The Times encouraged Bush to let recalcitrant foreigners woo him: "The President should not waste time trying to appease or win over those who have no time for him. There is the chance, perhaps, that with the passage of time the qualities which Americans see in this politician will become more obvious to others."

In Spain, leftist El País urged Prime Minister José Luis Zapatero to "accommodate the new reality, even though the result isn't what he hoped for" and fix the country's strained relationship with the United States. "This doesn't mean turning the page or starting over from the beginning, but leaving behind the unfortunate declarative politics on both sides." Conservative ABC—in what may have been a subtle dig at the Spanish voters who elected the Socialist Party, which had pledged to withdraw troops from Iraq, after the March 11 attacks—praised Americans for their steadfastness: "[Bush is] a president firm in his convictions and ready to fight to the end, until victory, against the threats that hang over America (and over all of us, even if we don't want to see it)."

Elsewhere in Europe, France's leftist Libération got with the program: "A new reactionary majority … has cemented its hold on American democracy. The rest of the world may deplore it, but it will have to adapt to this reality." Turkey's Hurriyet also echoed the familiar grin-and-bear-it theme: "American voters have once more brought someone they deserved to the presidency. In this case, what is left for us is to bear it and to protect our own interests with maximum sensitivity." But Sovietskaya Rossiya defaulted to quaintly archaic Cold War rhetoric: "Bearing in mind that Bush's policies are prompting increasingly powerful rejection in the entire world, mankind will inevitably unite against the common evil—American imperialism."


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: eurotrash; eurotwitsforkerry; wankersthemirror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-204 next last
To: Meglos

OK, just 51% of them.


81 posted on 11/04/2004 6:10:26 PM PST by revealerls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: revealerls
Nah, I like most of them. But I am ticked at some of their media, ok, most of their media.

They don't get us and I must admit, I don't get them. But can you imagine us treating an ally the way their media is treating us right now?

I may be a dumb American but I have manners. Something that is sorely lacking in some quarters in Britain.

82 posted on 11/04/2004 6:10:47 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Dear Santa, I am sorry about Donner but one deer looks pretty much like another in the forest......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift


83 posted on 11/04/2004 6:10:54 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Let me be the voice of reason. Look at the leftist rags as our mainstream media. Do they reflect the feelings of ALL Britons? I don't think they do anymore than the Alphabet Networks represent all Americans.


84 posted on 11/04/2004 6:11:28 PM PST by misharu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift; mtngrl@vrwc

F off, liberal brits.

Funny, I was just in London 2 weeks ago and my heavens how it is basically just like america with a worst dental hygiene and better subywas. Our clothes, our makeup (I bought Clinique at bonus time at Selfridges!!!), our movies, our credit cards, (first ads i saw in heathrow were for mastercard), our everything. Funny- they hate us but yet they have everything American.

just like germany- one of the people I met over there said everything american was cool. She brought magazines along and they all look EXACTLY like our magazines and then you have to look close and see that they are in german. It's nuts. And yet they hate us so. Whatever!!!

They'd better hope we never tire of their whining. Thank god for Tony Blair!!


85 posted on 11/04/2004 6:11:35 PM PST by lawgirl (Proud 2 time voter for George W. Bush as of 7:21 AM CST, November 2, 2004. LUVYA DUBYA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
Thursday's Daily Mirror: Over a picture of President George W. Bush, the paper asked, "How can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB?"...jeez - and I voted for Bush - makes me want to return my Phi Beta Kappa key......
86 posted on 11/04/2004 6:11:44 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
Still upset over the battle for independence?

Saving Europe in WWII was a necessity, to not have done so would have been at our own eventual peril (as is the current war on Islamonazism).
87 posted on 11/04/2004 6:13:06 PM PST by weegee (Zogbyism will forever more be the term for a leftist media snowjob designed to sway public opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
To the Brits:

We don't want you here, for fun. for business, for nuthin, PERIOD!


88 posted on 11/04/2004 6:14:27 PM PST by unixfox (Close the borders, problems solved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan
LOL Home before dark Lucas electrics and the wit-worth bolts and nuts. The electric meters with the coin slots are a nice touch also.
89 posted on 11/04/2004 6:16:03 PM PST by Fast1 (Kerry Con "My only regret is I have but one Country to destroy for my presidency”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: revealerls
OK, just 51% of them.

:-)

Of course, now I'm thinking about how nice it would be if we could just rework our living arrangements across the globe and voluntarily regroup by philosophy. Atlas Shrugged, anybody?

90 posted on 11/04/2004 6:17:42 PM PST by Meglos (Busy gloating, please come back later...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
Message to anti-Bush Brits: Shut The F*ck Up
91 posted on 11/04/2004 6:18:30 PM PST by Lockbar (March toward the sound of the guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

Poor Tony Blair, he has to put up with those blathering idiots.


92 posted on 11/04/2004 6:18:31 PM PST by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion has already been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

Let's remember there is a difference between the British MSM and the British men and women fighting along side our own.

I honor and thank the second.


93 posted on 11/04/2004 6:19:24 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
So they run a headline like that, and they call Bush devisive?
94 posted on 11/04/2004 6:19:59 PM PST by atomicpossum (They pelted us with rocks and garbage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

This mindset is not the mindset of Britain. It is the mindset of a newspaper. Big difference!!


95 posted on 11/04/2004 6:20:11 PM PST by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
Hey England, got something for your tabloids:


96 posted on 11/04/2004 6:20:21 PM PST by weegee (Zogbyism will forever more be the term for a leftist media snowjob designed to sway public opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WideGlide
ACHTUNG!! That friggin' headline would be in German if it wasn't for millions of guys like my Dad who volunteered to save their dumb Limey asses. Ingrates.

I wonder if in 2040, our military's kids will say the same thing to France (or even the New York Times) about not having their headlines in Arabic because of the USA.

97 posted on 11/04/2004 6:20:23 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Keys

Hey! That's a 120Million cheeks!


98 posted on 11/04/2004 6:22:29 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
"is against gun control"

Enjoy it when your restless radical Arab population starts eating you all alive. Without weapons, I pray they might find your much-vaunted speaking abilities reason enough not to saw your head off. How many times is the rest of the world going to repeat this big mistake? Did you not learn enough from a disarmed and slaughtered European Jewry? Did you not see the inherent fallacy of concentrating arms in one set of hands in the masses of dead in Cambodia? On a smaller scale, does it still make sense to you all to punish people defending themselves with deadly force? Wake up, Britannia, you've been had.

Thank you, Founding Fathers and every Patriot that grabbed a gun over these morons running our lives. Our country is so much better for evicting them.

99 posted on 11/04/2004 6:23:11 PM PST by mbennett203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
Of course Bush is divisive. See how divided the MSM is? They all oppose him.

Meanwhile the OTHER side of the division would have been told to LIE BACK AND TAKE IT as Kerry continued to demonize conservative Americans; had he won.
100 posted on 11/04/2004 6:23:16 PM PST by weegee (Zogbyism will forever more be the term for a leftist media snowjob designed to sway public opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson