Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GUESS WHO DID THE EXIT POLLS... (repost)
mitofskyinternational. ^ | 11/4/04

Posted on 11/03/2004 11:50:36 PM PST by paudio

Mitofsky International is a survey research company founded by Warren J. Mitofsky in 1993. Its primary business is conducting exit polls for major elections around the world. It does this work exclusively for news organizations. Mitofsky has directed exit polls and quick counts since 1967 for almost 3,000 electoral contests in United States, Mexico, Russia and the Philippines.

....

From 1967 to 1990, Mitofsky was executive director of the CBS News election and survey unit, and was an executive producer of its election night broadcasts. He conducted the first exit polls for CBS in 1967, and developed the projection and analysis system used successfully by CBS and Voter News Service. He started the CBS News/New York Times Poll in 1975 and directed it for CBS for its first 15 years.

(Excerpt) Read more at mitofskyinternational.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbsnews; edisonmediaresearch; election; election2004; electionday; exitpolls; mitofsky; vns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
I posted this yesterday, but I think it's important to be reposted. There are two companies that were contracted by the consortium of six networks. The other one was Edison Media Research.
1 posted on 11/03/2004 11:50:36 PM PST by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: paudio

BUMPED and bookmarked.
Thanks for reposting. I had missed this.


2 posted on 11/03/2004 11:52:05 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio
How can a repost be breaking news?
3 posted on 11/03/2004 11:52:10 PM PST by Fatalis (The Libertarian Party is to politics as Esperanto is to linguistics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fatalis
How can a repost be breaking news?

I think I checked a wrong box. My mistake.

4 posted on 11/03/2004 11:53:21 PM PST by paudio (4 More Years..... Thank you!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: paudio

bttt


5 posted on 11/03/2004 11:53:23 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Bump ... bookmarked ... and already emailed out :0)

Hey MSM ... We will never forget


6 posted on 11/03/2004 11:54:33 PM PST by Mo1 (one country, one Constitution, and one future that binds us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Thanks for reposting. I had no idea. And it should be in breaking news. I'm sure there are many who are still unaware of this.


7 posted on 11/03/2004 11:56:03 PM PST by lara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lara
And it should be in breaking news. I'm sure there are many who are still unaware of this.

By that standard half the articles here should be in breaking news. There are other sidebars.

8 posted on 11/03/2004 11:58:47 PM PST by Fatalis (The Libertarian Party is to politics as Esperanto is to linguistics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Anyone who expected the media to play the election straight is fooling themselves. There is no limit for the left, how low they will go, if it gains them power.
9 posted on 11/03/2004 11:59:31 PM PST by thoughtomator (The election's over... let's kick some jihadi butt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fatalis

That would depend on what the article is about. I would say this is important enough to keep it in breaking news. Once again CBS is trying to undermine an election.


10 posted on 11/04/2004 12:04:27 AM PST by lara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: paudio

From left to right: foreground: Warren Mitofsky, Joe Waksberg, Murray Edelman; background: Walter Cronkite, Charlie West, Martin Plissner

Warren Mitofsky started and directed the first network election pool, Voter Research & Surveys, from 1990 to 1993, later to become known as Voter News Service (VNS). Mitofsky and Edison Media Research have recently conducted exit polls in D.C., NJ, NY and for the 2003 California recall election. With the dissolution of VNS in 2002, the election consortium has chosen Edison and Mitofsky International to be the sole provider of Exit Polls for all Primaries and General Elections.

11 posted on 11/04/2004 12:09:12 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Wow, great! Where was Dan?


12 posted on 11/04/2004 12:10:16 AM PST by paudio (4 More Years..... Thank you!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Mitofsky International also specializes in legal proceedings. Its cases included the change of venue portion of the Amadou Diallo shooting by four New York City police; the challenge in the U.S. Senate to seating Diane Fienstein after her victory over Michael Huffington; the South Carolina video poker law suit; the First Amendment law suits by the news media challenging the anti-exit poll statutes of the states of Washington, Florida and Georgia; the change of venue portion of the Orange County, California, law suit agains Merrill Lynch; a trade mark law suit concerning Billy Banks’ Tae-Bo exercise video; an arbitration proceeding among 17 oil companies that banned together with DOJ approval to avoid takeover by Libya’s Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi; the authenticity of polling conducted for Oregon’s assisted suicide vote;

MI election research clients in the United States have included ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and Time; international clients include Televisa and the National Chamber for Radio and Television Broadcasting (Mexico), RAI (Italy), ZDF (Germany), Fuji (Japan), NTV and RTR (Russia) and Austrian and Finnish television.

MI conducted the only exit polls for the Russian presidential elections in 1996 and 2000. It also polled for the 1993 and 1999 Duma election. In 1994, MI conducted the only exit poll and quick count for the Mexican presidential election reported by the country's broadcast industry. Mitofsky received public commendation by President Carlos Salinas for his contribution to the election's credibility. MI and its Mexican partner, Consulta, have conducted exit polls for most governor elections between 1997-99 for Televisa, Mexico’s largest television network. Consulta/Mitofsky also covered the first PRI national presidential primary in 1999. MI started the only public opinion poll in Sri Lanka.

MI conducted exit polls for the 1994 mid-term U.S. elections for leading national newspapers. Since 1996, Mitofsky has done the electoral projections and analysis for president, governor and congress for CBS and CNN.

snip

Mitofsky came to CBS News in 1967 from the Census Bureau where he designed many surveys during the early days of the poverty program and for presidential commissions including those investigating the selective service system and the Watts riots. He also designed many other demographic surveys. Along with Joseph Waksberg, he developed a highly efficient random digit dialing telephone sampling method, which has been widely adopted.

13 posted on 11/04/2004 12:17:06 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Bump for an important post...and repost!


14 posted on 11/04/2004 12:18:18 AM PST by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

a pathetic looking bunch of Marxists


15 posted on 11/04/2004 12:19:16 AM PST by snuffy smiff (Jean Fraud Kerry-the Botox BoatWarrior,"oh no, aground again and huge riceberg approaching")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Wonders never cease. Dan Rather wanted so bad for Bush to loose, I guess he had a direct line to the exit polls which is why they practicly had to drag Rather off the set. He just couldnt accept the fact that Bush won. It was a kodak moment, too bad I missed it.

I sure hope this media bias is adressed soon. We can't let it be swept under the rug. NO MORE imbeds in the military either. Keep them out of war zones. If they want to risk their lives and hang out with the enemy, then they should know that they risk being fired on. No soldier should die just because a journalist is in the way, a jornalist who is just lying, and making the soldier look bad to boot.


16 posted on 11/04/2004 12:23:00 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fatalis
re: "By that standard half the articles here should be in breaking news. There are other sidebars"

I base the value of something by what it does for me. If it helps me then I consider it of high value, if it hurts me I put it in the 'low value' bin. I don't have either the time nor the inclination to review every post so I am thankful when someone re-posts something I find interesting. This post fall into that category. Institutions and practices that serve the interest of the end user, as opposed to the institution itself, are the ones that stand the tests of time. As I peruse the posts I just skip those that don't interest me or that I think I've already seen. I prefer the irritation of an occasional duplicate post to missing a post on an interesting subject.
17 posted on 11/04/2004 12:28:27 AM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: paudio

BUMPED


18 posted on 11/04/2004 12:29:42 AM PST by jokar (On line data base http://www.trackingthethreat.com/db/index.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwpjr
The repost isn't the point, having it in breaking news was.
19 posted on 11/04/2004 12:29:53 AM PST by Fatalis (The Libertarian Party is to politics as Esperanto is to linguistics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: paudio

I think of a lot has to do with why an organization does whatever it does. If it undertakes a task to prove its own beliefs then it's going to a hit and miss proposition. OTOH, if it undertakes a task to discover the facts, regardless of where the chips might fall, then it will probably be around for a while. If it goes after information to back its side the odds are 50-50 that it will consider its efforts worthwhile. If it turns out the data does not back their beliefs they will probably consider it an exercise in futility. OTOH, if it gathers and reports data regardless of its own beliefs then one side or the other is going to embrace its findings. This organization will always have a market for it product!


20 posted on 11/04/2004 12:34:49 AM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson