Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Analysis: Getting to 60 On Judicial Nominations in The New Senate
www.crushkerry.com ^ | 11/3/04 | www.crushkerry.com

Posted on 11/03/2004 7:37:13 AM PST by crushkerry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Dr Snide
Hey, mini-judical robes!

Black shorts for the guys? Well, in summertime - it must get hot in there. And nike's with white socks - yea, gotta wear sneaks. Maybe put their last names (nicknames?) on the back of their robes. I don't think they should be allowed to put product logos on their robes, though. Gotta draw a line somewhere.

21 posted on 11/03/2004 8:02:18 AM PST by searchandrecovery (Socialist America - diseased and dysfunctional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: searchandrecovery

I'm going out right now to get me some Air Scalias


22 posted on 11/03/2004 8:04:15 AM PST by Dr Snide (vis pacem, para bellum - Prepare for war if you want peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

We need to rewrite the Senate rules at the beginning of the next Congress in January and remove the filibuster option for judicial appointment votes, they are voted after being passed out of the Judiciary committee.

This is the only way to get a Conservative justice ever appointed again.


23 posted on 11/03/2004 8:04:18 AM PST by RobFromGa (A desperate man is a dangerous man, and Kerry is getting desperate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
Just like Kaddafy took a lesson from Saddam, Harry Reid is going to take one from Daschle.
24 posted on 11/03/2004 8:04:46 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

I know it's not a pick-up, but it is one of two that CNN hasn't called yet.

We had 36 not up for election

We had 12 incumbents win. (AL, AK*, AZ, ID, IA, KY, KS, MO, NH, OH, PA, UT.)

We won 6 open seats (FL*, GA, LA, NC, OK, SC)

We had 1 challenger defeat an incumbent (SD)

36+12+6+1=55

* - AK and FL haven't been called yet.


25 posted on 11/03/2004 8:07:41 AM PST by Gil4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
Why on earth would any Republican Senator join the filibusters?
THEIR VOTES WERE NOT NEEDED TO SUPPORT IT!

Sheesh, what a load.
"Other possibilities include Robert Byrd" ROFLOLTIME!

Collins ,Snowe, Voinovich and the rest voted against conservative justices because their voters wanted them to, They will continue to do so.

If you want to contribute some "analysis" of judicial nominations in the Senate, see what Senators up for election next time have to please a conservative electorate and which ones have to please a liberal electorate.

Hopefuly we'll see a rules change next year preventing filibustering of nominees. Otherwise it will remain a political football.

26 posted on 11/03/2004 8:09:14 AM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gil4

Holy crap. I was wrong. Will UPdate. Thanks.


27 posted on 11/03/2004 8:13:13 AM PST by crushkerry (Visit www.crushkerry.com to see John Kerry's positions filleted))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LincolnLover

You're right, though if Bush's large margin can be repeated in LA by the next GOP Presidential candidate in 2008 then a good GOP Senate candidate should have a chance to pull a Vitter over Landrieu.

But as to breaking Democrat fillibusters over judges, again, I think she will have no fear of voting her true left-wing stripes until at least 2007 when she knows she will have to amass some conservative votes to once again fool the people of Louisiana.


28 posted on 11/03/2004 8:18:51 AM PST by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
The good news is the correction is in the right direction - WOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

Please excuse the exuberance - Kerry called W to concede. It's a GOOOOOOD day now.
29 posted on 11/03/2004 8:20:15 AM PST by Gil4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

Frist measured the Senate weeks ago and concluded he could break most filibusters with 55 seats, and all filibusters with 56 seats. The republicans now have a filibuster proof majority.


30 posted on 11/03/2004 8:21:04 AM PST by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Gil4; Admin Moderator
Article Updated as follows:

UPDATE - DUE TO A LACK OF MATH SKILLS AND VERY LITTLE SLEEP I WAS INCORRECT IN MY COUNT. I HAD KNOWLES WINNING AK, AND IT LOOKS LIKE MURKOWSKI WILL WIN. THUS, I WAS NOT CORRECT IN ALL SENATE PREDICTIONS, AND THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT OUR ADVANTAGE IS +4 AND WE ONLY NEED TO CONVERT 5 DEMS TO BREAK A FILIBUSTER. SORRY, BUT IT'S A GOOD ERROR TO MAKE. THE MATH HAS BEEN CORRECTED IN THE ARTICLE, BUT YES, THE ORIGINAL COUNT WAS WRONG.

31 posted on 11/03/2004 8:21:46 AM PST by crushkerry (Visit www.crushkerry.com to see John Kerry's positions filleted))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

I'm not sure Lincoln Chaffee can be counted on in all things Republican in the Senate....


32 posted on 11/03/2004 8:38:22 AM PST by Keith (JOHN KERRY...IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE III SECTION 3 OF THE US CONSTITUTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Keith

On judicial nominees he's always voted to break the filibuster.


33 posted on 11/03/2004 8:42:52 AM PST by crushkerry (Visit www.crushkerry.com to see John Kerry's positions filleted))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

The trick will be breaking the FIRST filibuster. After we can show it can be done, there will be less resistance for the others.

And one of the first things Bush should do to start a second term is a VERY public PR campaign that the Senate is w-a-y behind on filling positions on the bench and he has an entire slate of them ready to go including Estrada and all the appeals court nominees that were blocked last time.

Be agrressive, Bush! The country has spoken so NOW is the time to use the bully pulpit and don't be a wuss about it.


34 posted on 11/03/2004 8:52:47 AM PST by Tall_Texan (Let's REALLY Split The Country! (http://righteverytime3.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

I'm afraid that if we are depending on Mary Landrau, we are in big trouble.


35 posted on 11/03/2004 10:04:14 AM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

I know that under current "rules" Arlen becomes head of the judiciary committee. Can anything be done to change that?


36 posted on 11/03/2004 10:04:50 AM PST by mathluv (Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan

I'm not sure Bush will "re-nominate" Estrada...too bad.


37 posted on 11/03/2004 10:08:00 AM PST by Keith (JOHN KERRY...IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE III SECTION 3 OF THE US CONSTITUTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
Other possibilities include Robert Byrd, who comes from a conservative state, and is feeling the heat of a possible competitive race against Shelly Capito, has shown willingness to vote for conservative judges in the past.

Heh. Robert Byrd was actually considered as a possible Supreme Court nominee by Richard Nixon.

38 posted on 11/03/2004 10:12:17 AM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathluv

That's only an intraparty rule. They can change it if they wish, just like the House did in 1994. Senate's a difft. animal though. They don't like change.


39 posted on 11/03/2004 10:14:35 AM PST by crushkerry (Visit www.crushkerry.com to see John Kerry's positions filleted))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
Unfortunately the Senate will not remove him from this position despite such hostility.

I'm not so sure about that. At the very least, the President can tell Specter how cows eat cabbage, so he won't be willing to obstruct Bush's nominees.

40 posted on 11/03/2004 10:19:31 AM PST by SuziQ (Bush in 2004-Because we MUST!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson