Skip to comments.
What is going on with the networks refusing to call it for Bush? FOX IS SCARED
Posted on 11/03/2004 2:15:02 AM PST by GLDNGUN
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
1
posted on
11/03/2004 2:15:02 AM PST
by
GLDNGUN
To: GLDNGUN
Does anyone have the California numbers?
2
posted on
11/03/2004 2:16:02 AM PST
by
Viet-Boat-Rider
(((KERRY IS A NARCISSISTIC LIAR, GOLDBRICKER, AND TRAITOR!)))
To: GLDNGUN
The MSM's last stand is tonight.
Congrats, Bush won, and we have hit the last nail in their coffin.
3
posted on
11/03/2004 2:16:42 AM PST
by
Stellar Dendrite
(How do you ask a goose to be the last goose to die in Ohio?)
To: GLDNGUN
The French press has already called it for President Bush. Leave it to the French to surrender first.
To: GLDNGUN
5
posted on
11/03/2004 2:17:23 AM PST
by
eclectic
(Falluja delenda est)
To: GLDNGUN
The excuses will be flying for years, stupid ignorant people.
These media whores should be sued for malpractice, getting the dummies hopes up.
To: GLDNGUN
Exactly, by not calling the states for Bush, they are keeping the President from declaring victory. Also, the longer Kerry can hold out, the greater the perception that the evil Republicans have stolen another election. This is just a pathetic attempt to dilute the mandate of the people.
7
posted on
11/03/2004 2:17:32 AM PST
by
Sketch
To: Sketch
it's just outright disgraceful what is going on right now ..
8
posted on
11/03/2004 2:18:15 AM PST
by
thestob
(Vote or P. Diddy will kill you)
To: GLDNGUN
We all need to email Drudge and ask him to call the election. If that were to happen, the MSM would fall in line immediately.
9
posted on
11/03/2004 2:20:19 AM PST
by
texastoo
(a "has-been" Republican)
To: Sketch
The longer the delay, the more I suspect fraud occurring by Dems!!
10
posted on
11/03/2004 2:20:45 AM PST
by
whadizit
To: Viet-Boat-Rider
11
posted on
11/03/2004 2:20:55 AM PST
by
DB
(©)
To: GLDNGUN
You're watching a coup. The beginning of CW-II. I'm going to get som sleep. I'll need a sharp eye tomorrow,, err,, later today.
12
posted on
11/03/2004 2:21:02 AM PST
by
DonnerT
(Terrorists,,,Kerrorists, what's the difference?)
To: GLDNGUN; Cincinatus' Wife; Fedora
13
posted on
11/03/2004 2:21:35 AM PST
by
risk
To: GLDNGUN
Yeah wtf, in Fox's own coverage in the news ticker they have Nevada with 100% of the votes in and Bush with a win, yet somehow they have forgot to give him the 5 electoral votes put him at 274 so we can all go to bed happy. I just went and looked at their website, they even have it on there too, what idiots
http://www.foxnews.com/youdecide2004/races.html?NV
Give me a damn break. I thought every network's goal was to call it first, is it now who can drag it out the longest even when the winer is inevitable?
To: GLDNGUN
Fox and NBC were right in calling Ohio for Bush. Now they're shaking in their boots, with 99% of the vote in in Iowa, New Mexico and Nevada, to call the vote for Bush. Wusses. (Fox may have called Nevada...)
What a bunch of losers.
15
posted on
11/03/2004 2:24:15 AM PST
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: GLDNGUN
Ok, then they can't call any for Kerry. You cannot call states for one candidate and not another.
With this basis, they must go back and pull the calls for all the states. How can you call some states early in the night and not call other states?
What are the options for Bush? Does he call for recounts on every Kerry state that is somewhat close? Does he look for fraud in Kerry states?
Or, is President Bush merely allowed to sit and wait while Kerry tries all options of theft? Bush to sit and wait while the media decides which states they will give him totally ignoring the votes of that state?
16
posted on
11/03/2004 2:25:24 AM PST
by
ClancyJ
(Vote for President Bush - For our grandchildren. Democrats are not to be trusted with our country)
To: All
Peter Jennings was complaining to George Stephenopolis that it is President' Bush's perogative to come out and declare victory. That it is wrong of him not to do this leaving it up to the networks. He then a few minutes later signed off for the night.
They won't give President Bush an inch even in his night of the largest historical victories in the U.S. Presidency. The American people aren't going to put up with this for more than a few hours tomorrow.
17
posted on
11/03/2004 2:26:26 AM PST
by
glory2
To: texastoo
I just did what you suggested and emailed Mat Drudge asking him to call the election for Bush. I think everyone should follow your advice - nothing to lose - right?
18
posted on
11/03/2004 2:26:49 AM PST
by
sdcraigo
(Kerry's plan is that he has a plan...)
To: Viet-Boat-Rider
Fox keeps mentioning that they can't call New Mexico over and over.
Meanwhile Bush is up by tens of thousands and 3% in Nevada and they refuse to call that...
Threatened, chicken, worried about lawsuits... Pick your poison.
19
posted on
11/03/2004 2:27:35 AM PST
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: GLDNGUN
Hasn't anybody noticed? This problem in Ohio coupled with a 24,000 vote 'hiccup' in NM (which has quit counting for the night) and ANOTHER 'hiccup' with 2 counties in Iowa is EXACTLY enough to hold off on calling a Bush reelection Does anyone her really believe this combination of improbabilities is a coincidence?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson