For Kerry to win in Ohio by a single vote, he would have to take about 75% of all those ballots, assuming they're all good. And those ballots come from all over Ohio, not just from Cleveland. And even in Cleveland, Kerry didn't take 75% of the vote.
So any way you scratch it, Kerry has lost. The only question is how much stupidity he wants to display before bowing to the inevitable. IMHO.
John / Billybob
My opinion as well. This was a good night for George Bush, even PA was only 51-48 Kerry. Without the MSM covering for Kerry, it would have been a laugher.
Good night.
Do you have any idea who I should contact in CA (or elsewhere) about the returns for Nevada county here in California - that is reporting 112.8% voter turnout with 78.2% of the precincts reporting?
http://vote2004.ss.ca.gov/Returns/status.htm
Senator Kerry is merely displaying the traits that should have been obvious to anyone who voted for him.
Senator Kerry is a two time money grubbing gigilo who does not have the integrity or strength of character to make his own decisions. It is quite obvious the man has taken the easy way out all his life which is is reflected by the way he talks about "allies" and a "global test." When one engages in "constructive dialogue" with "allies" it gives the appearance of accomplishment without actually having to make any real effort to make the unpopular decision. Plus, when the "allies" help to make your decisions, this means you don't have to take responsibility for that decision. This is pure unadulterated laziness.
Senator Kerry's life is completely consumed by his elitist attitude that he is "born to rule" and deserves everything to be handed to him, without any effort on his part. Again, I point to his history in regards to Vietnam, and his marriages.
I mention all this, because I think he truly believes he "deserves" to be president, plus does not know how to make his own decision and will let others decide for him on how to handle the post election.