Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daschle flames out in his bogus lawsuit

Posted on 11/01/2004 7:55:51 PM PST by eddiebear

November 01, 2004 Live Report From Courtroom A Mr. Jordan was just testifying at the hearing in Daschle's lawsuit to stop poll watching. He worked for Howard Dean in Iowa. He said that poll watchers would "roll their eyes" and make a "negative face" at times and that, in his opinion, this constituted "intimidation" of voters. See SDP for a look at the complaint.

UPDATE: Another report on Daschle's first witness, the Howard Dean worker. He's a lawyer from Virginia who works for Lexis-Nexis and has been in South Dakot for 48 hours. He testified to "note-taking" and "faces" being made. He said nothing was said to voters and nobody was disenfranchised. They are taking a short break before the next witness. Lawyers in the courtroom think this is an absurd joke. SDP calls it "The Death Rattle of Daschle's Political Career."

UPDATE: SDP has some more information on the judge, including this comment from Daschle at the American TRIAL LAWYERS Association convention:

First, I got my start in politics thanks to lawyers... rather, one lawyer in particular. In 1978, I won my first election to the House by 14 votes. Don’t laugh, in South Dakota, that’s 60 percent of the vote. Apparently undaunted by that landslide of support, my opponent sued to contest the election. I was fortunate to be represented by a great lawyer and a dear friend, Larry Piersol. It took one year and 21 days, but here I am 25 years later. UPDATE: Daschle rests. Cancels other witness because first one got destroyed. Dismissal requested by Republicans. Dismissal denied.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: 2004electionfraud; 2004votefraud; 2004voterfraud; cameras; court; crime; daschle; daschlesucks; democratscheat; dirtyrats; dirtytricks; doublestandard; election; electioneering; electionlaws; fifthcolumn; filthyrats; fraud; howtostealanelection; intimidation; lawsuit; marxists; michaelmoore; polls; pollwatchers; pollwatching; radicalleftists; rats; rattricks; sd; sorelosers; southdakota; southdakotafraud; southdakotavotefraud; sue; thune; tpd; videocameras; votefraud; voterfraud; voterintimidation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: Enterprise
Hey Judge - Yer too late! We ALREADY know what is happening. The WHOLE NATION KNOWS!

Maybe shining a light on these cockroaches will make them be honest. (Doubt it, really.)

81 posted on 11/01/2004 9:30:36 PM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

"Your Honor, why is it okay to have UN election monitors but not American?"

That burns my backside more than anything. Feeling like a Dean scream!

More liberal one-world BS.

Think I'm gonna mellow out with the Dallas rally for President Bush on C-Span. He just got done giving an absolutely knock it out of the ballpark speech.

Toby Keith and others performing.

Gotta awake bright-eyed and "Bushie-tailed" in the a.m. to vote!

Minnesota's going GW!


82 posted on 11/01/2004 9:30:49 PM PST by mplsconservative (Old media = lies. New media = truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Dianna; mplsconservative

I think the Judge clearly realizes that he is wading in deep ethics waters. He comment about "websites" is revealing. Amazing what a little light can do isn't it?


83 posted on 11/01/2004 9:35:26 PM PST by Enterprise (The left hates the Constitution. Islamic Fascism hates America. Natural allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Are you making fun of Sen Byrd and the techniques of the Segregation dems? Shame.
84 posted on 11/01/2004 9:36:14 PM PST by snooker (Bush 2004 --- stay with the strong horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: writmeister

Cool!


85 posted on 11/01/2004 9:42:08 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut
UPDATE: The judge raises the issue of live reports coming from the courtroom and ending up on some website. What an outrage!

Liberals and cockroaches both scurry for cover and shadow when the BIGHT LIGHTS are on them.

86 posted on 11/01/2004 9:42:35 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Truth, Justice and the Texan Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

UPDATE: The judge is now in chambers and will be ruling in 20 minutes.


87 posted on 11/01/2004 9:43:18 PM PST by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

UPDATE: The only testimony for Daschle was the Howard Dean supporter who had no evidence of intimidation. No voter or country official testified to intimidation. It was also noted that the judge accepted testimony via telephone in the case and Daschle could still produce no testimony of intimidation.


88 posted on 11/01/2004 9:44:20 PM PST by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Rats tend to scatter in daylight.

That said, my dad knows this guy really well (and despises him privately, and that's something 'cause my dad loves people).

I really don't think deep ethics waters would bother Judge Piersol. Like most rats he is morally "right" in his own mind. I tend to think he'd go with his sorry guts to sway this election.

I could be wrong, and I hope I am.


89 posted on 11/01/2004 9:45:04 PM PST by mplsconservative (Old media = lies. New media = truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob; Petronski
There IS a mechanism to get decisions from the Supreme Court at any time. There was a legendary case where attorneys hiked into the woods to find Justice Douglas. They emerged with a signed order. If this federal judge, who should have disqualified himself anyway, rules in Daschle's favor, the appeal goes first to the Circuit, not to the Supremes.

Then why couldn't we get an injuction againt that God awful ruling about poll watchers in Ohio?

90 posted on 11/01/2004 9:47:10 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Then why couldn't we get an injuction againt that God awful ruling about poll watchers in Ohio?

Ripeness. The dispute is not 'ripe' (timely available to the court's jurisdiction) until it has become an actual problem. An appellate court would never rule prospectively against a lower court's possible misjudgment.

91 posted on 11/01/2004 9:50:09 PM PST by Petronski (A Monday morning quarterback has never led any team to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Hotdog
It was also noted that the judge accepted testimony via telephone in the case

WHAT ???

How exactly is someone gonna testify and SWEAR over a phone ??

If he rules for Daschle and it stands ... I shudder to think where we are gonna be in 4 years.

92 posted on 11/01/2004 9:54:58 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Truth, Justice and the Texan Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Hotdog

What a pathetic and fitting end to Tiny Tom's political career.


93 posted on 11/01/2004 9:55:17 PM PST by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: eddiebear

This is less about whether 50 extra fraudulant Indians get to vote, and more about Daschle staging a media stunt to try to shake things up a bit. Daschle just didn't like the way the jello was jelling apparently.


94 posted on 11/01/2004 10:03:53 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Don't be too sure. With no one watching you can sure put more than 50 votes on the tab.


95 posted on 11/01/2004 10:09:25 PM PST by snooker (Bush 2004 --- stay with the strong horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

If he's hearing evidence and there has not been a challenge or a recusal motion, its probably a little bit late to bring one now.


96 posted on 11/01/2004 10:24:34 PM PST by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: snooker

The judge is going to rule this morning just before voting opens - to late to contest.


97 posted on 11/01/2004 10:37:39 PM PST by Nov3 (Is it just me or has correct titling, formating, and linking of posts become a lost art?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah; All

Just wear a cowboy hat. This will cause all the leftists to freak since obviously an ordinary cowboy hat is just to scare those who support Kerry's desire to curry favor with france, which is obviously scared of cowboys.


98 posted on 11/01/2004 10:57:55 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! NOV 2, 2004 is VETERANS DAY! VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nov3

Most likely the Thune lawyers are drafting appeal papers at the ready to take up on appeal immediatly just in case.


99 posted on 11/01/2004 11:01:24 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! NOV 2, 2004 is VETERANS DAY! VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative

Actually thanks to FR SPECIFICALLY, I think Nov 2 will have an INSTANTANEOUS news cycle which NONE of the networks will be able to match.


100 posted on 11/01/2004 11:03:39 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! NOV 2, 2004 is VETERANS DAY! VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson