Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is an appeal for Bush and the future of this land, not a flame, because I am seriously worried about America if Kerry is elected. I believe keeping him out is worth a compromise.
1 posted on 11/01/2004 6:34:54 AM PST by Agitate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: Agitate

This former Buchanan voter is solidly behind Bush this time around.


2 posted on 11/01/2004 6:36:02 AM PST by cripplecreek (We've turned the corner and we're not smokin crack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

My guess would be that Libertarians are in favor of homo "marriage". That is the position of most libertarians I know.


3 posted on 11/01/2004 6:37:11 AM PST by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

We can't have the perfect choice, but we have a RESPONSIBILITY to ourselves and the country to pick the best viable choice, IMHO.

Electing John Kerry would be a disaster, in so many ways. I have a lot of respect for the many of the principles of the parties you mentioned. But I think we all have to be realistic. Good post!


5 posted on 11/01/2004 6:38:13 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

Post that at LibertyPost.


7 posted on 11/01/2004 6:38:14 AM PST by Nataku X (Get Informed of the Polls: http://polipundit.com/index.php?p=4176)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

I never did understand why someone would only vote for a candidate if they agreed with the candidate 100% of the time. Heck, I don't agree with my hubby 100% of the time and I married him. Oh well, I guess common sense in this day and age has "gone to hell in a handbasket" as my sainted grandmother used to say.


8 posted on 11/01/2004 6:39:03 AM PST by abnegation (John Kerry makes any sane person ill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate
Rational third-party voters in battleground states will undoubtedly vote for Bush. The irrational ones won't, but their numbers are small.

I think you'll find this to be the case tomorrow night. The third parties will do better in states where the outcome is already known.

9 posted on 11/01/2004 6:39:41 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate
I've never understood protest votes. Picking the best electable candidate versus the perfect non-electable candidate gives you some voice and evolutionary change.

All or nothing, is the equivalent of taking your ball and going home. In Italy there are hundreds of parties and everyone can vote for just what they want, but then a ruling coalition must be formed and that parties 3 votes are squelched anyway. In our system, it is up to the voter to decide on his/her own coalition.

A Republican has to win to do anything, and the inconvenient fact is, that mean appealing to more than 50% of the voters. You might be right, 100% right, but unless you can bring 49% with you, get over yourselves and vote for what's best for this country.

Nuff said.
16 posted on 11/01/2004 6:44:52 AM PST by SampleMan ("Yes I am drunk, very drunk. But you madam are ugly, and tomorrow morning I shall be sober." WSC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

BS...WHAT A BUNCH OF CRAP

There at least 1000 conservative voters who don't vote at all FOR EACH Libertarian or Constitutional VOTER...If Bush can't get reelected it won't be because Libertarians voted Libertarian....

IT WILL BE BECAUSE BUSH VOTERS DIDN'T GOTV or make a persuasive enough argument!

Give me a frigging break....Vote your heart and mind, and if that is Libertarian because your in favor of legalized drugs and gays....go for it

18 posted on 11/01/2004 6:46:07 AM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

The only candidate that a person agrees with 100% on the issues is themselves.

The only candidate who can win tomorrow are Bush or Kerry.!

Volunteer as a poll watcher tomorrow (especially in swing states ... OH, PA, NJ, etc). Don't let Kerry steal the election.

Tomorrow's election: SHOCK AND AWE.!


21 posted on 11/01/2004 6:48:02 AM PST by bluebeak (PA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

Flame suit on and ready.

That's what we were told 4 years ago. I am tired of the RNC moving more and more to the left each election. I will vote for Bush but not because he is conservative. I just don't want Kerry and the liberal media to win.

It would be helpful if someone could list all of the conservative things Bush has done the last 4 years compared with all of the centrist positions. I don't want to see statements he made, but actual policies (and don't include the WOT, we already know about that).


23 posted on 11/01/2004 6:49:31 AM PST by okkev68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

I'm libertarian, but I think the libertarian party is morally bankrupt! They're pro-baby-murder and pro-gay and pro-druggie! ICK!


31 posted on 11/01/2004 6:53:24 AM PST by Darth Gill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

Voting Constitution may make a person feel better, but in the end it is a vote for the very opposite, John Kerry.

We don't life in a country with a parliamentarian form of government. If we did, the Constitution Party could have delegates elected which would align with other parties to form a majority. As it is, the Constitution Party comprises only protest votes, and no one will be listening, no pro-life Supreme Court justice will be nominated, and no pro-abortion laws will be stopped. One had might as well spit against the wind.

The Republican Party is the place for pro-lifers and those who believe in personal responsibility. The GOP comprises different groups allied against the entitlement party of the left. It is the only place, at the time, for those who treasure the Judeo-Christian values of our founding.


35 posted on 11/01/2004 6:55:57 AM PST by Broadus (The chief end of man is to glority God and enjoy Him forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

I voted for Browne in 2000 and 1996, Andre Marrou in 1992, and Mike Dukakis in 1988.

Tomorrow, I will proudly punch my ballot for George W. Bush.

The Supreme Court, our security, and our economic future are too important to entrust to "None of the Above", which is a default vote for Kerry.

Bush has flaws, but this is not the time to obsess about them. The alternative is far worse.


47 posted on 11/01/2004 7:05:03 AM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

Ok, I'll bite.

Here's why I will not vote for Bush.

1. Federal government now involved with marriage counseling and distribution of tax dollars to so-called "faith based" organizations, ie, churches, mosques, synagogues, etc.

2. Horrific deficit spending, fiscal irresponsibility.

3. Corporate welfare. Halliburton is, I believe, just a drop in the bucket.

4. A war in a foreign county which, apparently, is now justified by the idea that we must impose our values on a foreign people. (PS: I did support the Afghanistan action.)

5. A belief that the American people need government big-brother protection more than they need the Bill of Rights and other constitutional guarantees. (We, the people, are not wimps.)

6. Will Kerry be good for our country? No. But the above is a liberal agenda, not a conservative agenda. So my last reason for not voting for Bush is this: the Republican Party needs to clean up its act and reexamine its commitment to small government, and allegience to the Consitution and the principles on which our country is based.


53 posted on 11/01/2004 7:07:05 AM PST by dlt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

Moral-liberals will do what they think is best in electing moral-liberal Democrats, while those border-wedgies will see that Ralph Nader and his Socialist Worker's Party cohort best address their big concerns of 'border-tongue-kulture.'


54 posted on 11/01/2004 7:07:08 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

THIS Libertarian is spliting his ticket...


67 posted on 11/01/2004 7:17:49 AM PST by null and void (If the next attack is 5X worse than 9/11, who do you want in the White House leading us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate
I thought you didn't need the votes from "Liberaltarians"?

What happened to change your mind?

68 posted on 11/01/2004 7:18:05 AM PST by ActionNewsBill ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

Third party voter voting for Bush, and working for Bush victory, in a safe Bush state. Needs all the votes he can get.


76 posted on 11/01/2004 7:23:40 AM PST by eyespysomething (Idealism is fine, but as it approaches reality the cost becomes prohibitive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

I don't like it, but I will vote for Bush in the Presidential section. Constitution Party everywhere else that I can.

I hope that next time I will be able to vote for the candidate that I agree with on most issues, instead of being blackmailed all the time into voting for the lesser of two evils.


80 posted on 11/01/2004 7:29:06 AM PST by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Agitate

SCOTUS


86 posted on 11/01/2004 7:41:10 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson