The CIA in deep Qaqaa

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | October 30, 2004 | Dr. Jack Wheeler

[Ginifer]

Since new CIA Director Porter Goss blocked the October Surprise agency left-wingers had prepared against Bush (discussed in "Porter At The Pass" last week), they desperately rigged another one, working with Mohammed ElBaradei at the U.N.

What nobody is focusing on in Al Qaqaagate is that the CIA is behind it. The anti-Bush lefties are now known as the "Rogue Weasels" at Langley, and they are frantic to do whatever they can to elect Kerry. They cooked up this entire phony "tons of missing explosives" scandal, sweet-talked the head of the U.N.'s nuclear inspection agency, ElBaradei, to carry their water and leak it to CBS – which drooled at the opportunity to spring the story on election eve. They then briefed Kerry and prepared his instant assault on Bush once the surprise broke.

But some clever pro-Bush Langley folks, seeing they couldn't spike the story at CBS, sweet-talked the New York Times into jumping the gun, spoiling the surprise and giving the Bush campaign time to tear the phony scandal apart. Then they leaked it to Drudge, whose website promptly blew the lid off the whole scam.

The Al Qaqaa scandal (the site of the "missing" explosives in Iraq is named Al Qaqaa – isn't that just too beautiful?) becomes Al Qaqaagate, and Kerry ends up looking like the opportunist fool he is, so clueless he doesn't realize he's accusing American soldiers in Iraq of "incredible incompetence" rather than Bush.

This was the last gasp of the Rogue Weasels. Porter's Purge is coming – upwards of 80 Bush-hating left-wing Kerry stooges are going to be fired at the CIA in November. Looks like the pro-America guys are going to be running the Company once again.

[First_Salute]

"It's the seriousness of the charges." - bump.

[Recovering Hermit]

Al Qaqaagate

Okay, al-Qaqaa is stupid enough...let append the ever-popular "gate" suffix to make it even more unreadable.

*cringe*

[MisterRepublican]

Bush needs to clean out the Clintonistas from all government agencies.

[numberonepal]

President Bush has again been reminded of his mistake not to fire ALL Clinton hold overs.

[independentmind]

Porter's Purge is coming – upwards of 80 Bush-hating left-wing Kerry stooges are going to be fired at the CIA in November.

I hope so.

Not too long ago, I suggested that the Iraqi prison scandal was manipulated by anti-Bushites inside the CIA and another poster accused me of being a conspiracy theorist.

Time will tell...

[LouD]

bump for later

[GOPJ]

This was the last gasp of the Rogue Weasels. Porter's Purge is coming – upwards of 80 Bush-hating left-wing Kerry stooges are going to be fired at the CIA in November. Looks like the pro-America guys are going to be running the Company once again.

Oh please, oh please, let it happen. Dump the left wing saboteurs.

[marty60]

I hope this is true. The evil Dums and their fellow travelers at the CIA have done enormous damage to our safety. But expect a rash of anti-American books from the commie symps and Dum shills when they get the boot.

[maestro]

BTTT

[maestro]

BTTT

[devane617]

Tin Foil hat time, I think I hear the helicopters coming...

[Jimmy Valentine's brother]

A purge at the State Department is also required.

[mewzilla]

I wonder if it was the same group that sent Joe Wilson on his little junket to Niger?

[Guenevere]

bttt

[TomGuy]

Why would CIA prefer Kerry? Kerry has been trying to cut their budget by $billions and actually get rid of the whole agency for years.

That doesn't make much sense for CIA, even if they are at odds with the Bush Administration.

From a 1970 article in The Harvard Crimson, John Kerry: A Navy Dove Runs for Congress:

He [Kerry] supports a volunteer Army, "if and only if we can create the controls for it. You're going to have to prepare for the possibility of a national emergency, however." Kerry said that the United Nations should have control over most of our foreign military operations. "I'm an internationalist. I'd like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations."

"On other issues, Kerry wants "to almost eliminate CIA activity. "

This, coupled with his wanting to cut the CIA budget doesn't make Kerry a friend of the CIA.

[mewzilla]

Just a friend of a few people in the CIA. That's bad enough.

[silverleaf]

Kerry also openly proposes to raise taxes on wealthy people, yet the wealthy as a class almost overwhelmingly prefer Kerry when polled.

Kerry is an anti-defense liberal who will NEVER prosecute a war on terror with the vigor of Bush... plus he is a staunch globalist who has never criticized the UN - a bastion of antisemitism- yet American Jews, whose throats would be collectively cut in a millisecond by al Qaeda, plan to vote for Kerry in overwhelming numbers.

So it is impossible for many of us to understand the logic thought processes of Kerry supporters who will be adversely affected by a Kerry presidency, including the second tier bureaucrats in those government agencies against which Kerry has an 20 year long hostile voting record.

[petercooper]

If Saddam didn't have any WMD, which the whole world said were there before the war, why was he blocking the inspectors at every point?? He never gave them unlimited access to all sites at anytime as he was supposed to. Plus he was given 100 last chances before we went in, after 18 resolutions, don't you think he woulda moved them? We didn't have to prove he had them, he had to prove he didn't have them.

So according to liberals, now these 380 tons of explosives are easily move-able and now missing. But WMD's which the whole world said were there before the war, are not there now, were not moved, and were never there, and Bush lied. And according to liberals, Bush is negligent for not doing enough to prevent 9-11, but a reckless warmonger for taking out Saddam, because Saddam didn't have any WMD's, but he did have highly explosive conventional weapons which are now missing.

That argument doesn't square..

[snopercod]

Be sure to read #5