Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/30/2004 4:41:17 AM PDT by Ginifer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: snopercod

"It's the seriousness of the charges." - bump.


2 posted on 10/30/2004 4:44:22 AM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer
Al Qaqaagate

Okay, al-Qaqaa is stupid enough...let append the ever-popular "gate" suffix to make it even more unreadable.

*cringe*

3 posted on 10/30/2004 4:46:54 AM PDT by Recovering Hermit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer

Bush needs to clean out the Clintonistas from all government agencies.


4 posted on 10/30/2004 4:46:55 AM PDT by MisterRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer

President Bush has again been reminded of his mistake not to fire ALL Clinton hold overs.


5 posted on 10/30/2004 4:47:41 AM PDT by numberonepal (Cameras, ammo, arms, eyes, and ears on election day. bringyourcamera.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer
Porter's Purge is coming – upwards of 80 Bush-hating left-wing Kerry stooges are going to be fired at the CIA in November.

I hope so.

Not too long ago, I suggested that the Iraqi prison scandal was manipulated by anti-Bushites inside the CIA and another poster accused me of being a conspiracy theorist.

Time will tell...

6 posted on 10/30/2004 4:48:24 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer

bump for later


7 posted on 10/30/2004 4:49:40 AM PDT by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer
This was the last gasp of the Rogue Weasels. Porter's Purge is coming – upwards of 80 Bush-hating left-wing Kerry stooges are going to be fired at the CIA in November. Looks like the pro-America guys are going to be running the Company once again.

Oh please, oh please, let it happen. Dump the left wing saboteurs.

8 posted on 10/30/2004 4:50:16 AM PDT by GOPJ (If 260 National Guard vets said Bush was an incompetent liar, the MSM would cover it. BiGTime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer

I hope this is true. The evil Dums and their fellow travelers at the CIA have done enormous damage to our safety. But expect a rash of anti-American books from the commie symps and Dum shills when they get the boot.


9 posted on 10/30/2004 4:50:26 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer

Tin Foil hat time, I think I hear the helicopters coming...


12 posted on 10/30/2004 4:54:23 AM PDT by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer

I wonder if it was the same group that sent Joe Wilson on his little junket to Niger?


14 posted on 10/30/2004 5:04:28 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer

bttt


15 posted on 10/30/2004 5:05:08 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer
Why would CIA prefer Kerry? Kerry has been trying to cut their budget by $billions and actually get rid of the whole agency for years.

That doesn't make much sense for CIA, even if they are at odds with the Bush Administration.

From a 1970 article in The Harvard Crimson, John Kerry: A Navy Dove Runs for Congress:

He [Kerry] supports a volunteer Army, "if and only if we can create the controls for it. You're going to have to prepare for the possibility of a national emergency, however." Kerry said that the United Nations should have control over most of our foreign military operations. "I'm an internationalist. I'd like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations."

"On other issues, Kerry wants "to almost eliminate CIA activity. "


This, coupled with his wanting to cut the CIA budget doesn't make Kerry a friend of the CIA.
16 posted on 10/30/2004 5:06:27 AM PDT by TomGuy (His VN crumbling, he says 'move on'. So now, John Kerry is running on Bob KerrEy's Senate record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer
If Saddam didn't have any WMD, which the whole world said were there before the war, why was he blocking the inspectors at every point?? He never gave them unlimited access to all sites at anytime as he was supposed to. Plus he was given 100 last chances before we went in, after 18 resolutions, don't you think he woulda moved them? We didn't have to prove he had them, he had to prove he didn't have them.

So according to liberals, now these 380 tons of explosives are easily move-able and now missing. But WMD's which the whole world said were there before the war, are not there now, were not moved, and were never there, and Bush lied. And according to liberals, Bush is negligent for not doing enough to prevent 9-11, but a reckless warmonger for taking out Saddam, because Saddam didn't have any WMD's, but he did have highly explosive conventional weapons which are now missing.

That argument doesn't square..

19 posted on 10/30/2004 5:54:52 AM PDT by petercooper (Everything I ever needed to know about Islam, I learned on 9-11-01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ginifer
Looks like the pro-America guys are going to be running the Company once again.

Great news, but I will believe it when I see it.

I find Jack Wheeler to be one of the more believable "insiders", however.

22 posted on 10/30/2004 6:31:12 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson