Skip to comments.
Bill O'Reilly SETTLES!
Posted on 10/28/2004 3:50:44 PM PDT by Destro
Just reported on NBC News
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adultery; aloofahwhere; antiamerican; apoxonbothhouses; arrogantblowhard; awalkonthewildside; bigbucks; billclinton; billoreilly; cheater; criminal; democrat; deviance; dollarbillo; dumberthanowlshit; eraseyourspeeddial; exaggeratedmanhood; extortionskank; factorihardlyknowher; factorthongsonsale; falafel; flyspeckfilth; gap; getyourfreakon; heybabywannaboogie; hypocrit; idiot; isthisabadconnection; isthisthebloviator; keepitpithy; layofftheswiftiesbor; lecher; lewdandlascivious; liar; liberal; liberalhoochie; likegladiatormovies; loofah; lookingoutforyou; lowlife; marvalbertfanclub; monicalewinsky; nakedmanonlineone; nastyasyouwanttobe; notafactoranylonger; ohreallyoreilly; oneringydingy; oopsyouhavetapes; oreilly; paulajones; pervert; philanderer; phonesex; pompousvilepig; pornography; presstitutes; sexualharassment; soulmateofdickmorris; spankingtheomonkey; spankmehard; stunemybeeberplease; thegosinzone; themoskinzone; toesucker; whatareyouwearing; whoslookingoutforyou; wiveswithvibrators
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 261-279 next last
To: k2blader
I'm not a lawyer. And I'd be insulted if I didn't know you better ;)
121
posted on
10/28/2004 4:18:00 PM PDT
by
ml1954
(Kerry, A Legend In His Own Mind.)
To: K4Harty
Loofing out for the folks!
122
posted on
10/28/2004 4:18:01 PM PDT
by
Ruddles
To: Destro
Wow! "Settles" more often than not translates to "Guilty".
To: sitetest
She asked for the settlement. Last week. She folded first. She had no case.
Since we will likely never know, we are both free to sit tight in our opinions.
124
posted on
10/28/2004 4:18:23 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
To: Keith in Iowa
Sir! I will have you know I don't whizz into the wind - electric fences - now that is another matter.
125
posted on
10/28/2004 4:18:36 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: wardaddy
"Jerkoff traitor Swifty basher.....I'd like to personally kick his arrogant arse."I'm with you.
To: MineralMan
I don't think so. The settlement terms no doubt dealt with any tapes, which were probably turned over to O'Reilly's attorneys. I have no doubt that this is so and with honorable parties makes sense but she's a scammer who no doubt has copies, hell I would. So we might see them, who knows? she might burn through the money so it won't matter to her monetarily to release them when she's broke to make more money.
127
posted on
10/28/2004 4:19:24 PM PDT
by
Lx
(If dolphins are so smart, why do they live in igloos?)
To: Destro
>>>Sir! I will have you know I don't whizz into the wind - electric fences - now that is another matter.
Whatever gives you a charge...
128
posted on
10/28/2004 4:19:52 PM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it - up.")
To: The Toad
Settles" more often than not translates to "Guilty". Yes. It could mean that Mackris was guilty of extortion. If she had no tapes, then she knew she was going to lose, and might be hit with a big extortion judgment.
129
posted on
10/28/2004 4:20:01 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
To: MineralMan
Years ago, for a fairly short time, Colmes' syndicated radio show played in our area and I thought he was terrible.
Then he went on TV opposite Hannity and I thought, " he's not so bad after all".
130
posted on
10/28/2004 4:20:12 PM PDT
by
iconoclast
(Conservative, not partisan)
To: sinkspur; sitetest
If she folded first - why did BOR also settle and seal the case? bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
131
posted on
10/28/2004 4:20:26 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: Destro
Ha! I read that headline and I thought he finally decided who he was going to vote for for President.
To: Keith in Iowa
"...all Parties have agreed that there was no wrongdoing whatsoever by Mr. O'Reilly, Ms. Mackris, or Ms. Mackris' counsel,"
Well then, I think it must have been an October Surprise, orchestrated by the Kerry campaign to take the pressure off of Kerry's pathetic "plan" that has flopped to terribly in the public's eye.
To: RWRbestbyfar
Here's a brief for you, Mr. Lawyer - we don't care about your terminology. O'Reilly's guilty regardless of jargon. Nobody here is foolish enough to believe he admitted to such in his settlement. It doesn't matter, it's clear he's guilty.
To: sinkspur
Then why did she settle? Are we to believe that BOR is a classical gentleman in this case.
135
posted on
10/28/2004 4:22:04 PM PDT
by
ml1954
(Kerry, A Legend In His Own Mind.)
To: Destro
I
f she folded first - why did BOR also settle and seal the case? bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzHe wants it over. She may have admitted she had nothing.
You just don't know.
But we do know that you adulterate headlines on Free Republic.
136
posted on
10/28/2004 4:22:08 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
To: sinkspur
> If she had no tapes, ...
Even if she did have tapes, her side did not conduct this
as a harrassment complaint.
BoR keeps his money.
She stays out of jail.
Both reputations trashed.
No tears here.
137
posted on
10/28/2004 4:22:52 PM PDT
by
Boundless
(Was your voter registration sabotaged by ACORN? Don't find out Nov. 2. Vote early.)
To: ml1954
Then why did she settle? Are we to believe that BOR is a classical gentleman in this case. Who knows? But we do know (since she blabbed to everybody she could) that she was out to get him.
138
posted on
10/28/2004 4:23:07 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
To: sinkspur
Dear sinkspur,
"She asked for the settlement. Last week. She folded first. She had no case."
Yeah, so what? If you think you can get a few million without having to go to trial over going to trial and getting more, why not take the money and run?
If it were me, I'd rather take a few mill in the hand, no fuss, no muss, then hold out for a chance for more, knowing what I'd be in for.
"Since we will likely never know, we are both free to sit tight in our opinions."
For sure? No.
But, if they didn't pay anything, Fox wants the whole world to know, big time. If they didn't pay anything, then her case was so bad, they didn't have to agree to silence.
sitetest
139
posted on
10/28/2004 4:23:27 PM PDT
by
sitetest
(Why does everyone get so uptight about toasted heretics??)
To: sinkspur; The Toad
No - more like the tapes were between 2 consenting adults. Since clearly her job was not on the line in relation to accepting BOR's advancement there is no sexual harassment possible. Only BOR on tape talking about vibrators - this he does not want out even if he is innocent of sexual harassment.
140
posted on
10/28/2004 4:23:52 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 261-279 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson