Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill O'Reilly SETTLES!

Posted on 10/28/2004 3:50:44 PM PDT by Destro

Just reported on NBC News


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adultery; aloofahwhere; antiamerican; apoxonbothhouses; arrogantblowhard; awalkonthewildside; bigbucks; billclinton; billoreilly; cheater; criminal; democrat; deviance; dollarbillo; dumberthanowlshit; eraseyourspeeddial; exaggeratedmanhood; extortionskank; factorihardlyknowher; factorthongsonsale; falafel; flyspeckfilth; gap; getyourfreakon; heybabywannaboogie; hypocrit; idiot; isthisabadconnection; isthisthebloviator; keepitpithy; layofftheswiftiesbor; lecher; lewdandlascivious; liar; liberal; liberalhoochie; likegladiatormovies; loofah; lookingoutforyou; lowlife; marvalbertfanclub; monicalewinsky; nakedmanonlineone; nastyasyouwanttobe; notafactoranylonger; ohreallyoreilly; oneringydingy; oopsyouhavetapes; oreilly; paulajones; pervert; philanderer; phonesex; pompousvilepig; pornography; presstitutes; sexualharassment; soulmateofdickmorris; spankingtheomonkey; spankmehard; stunemybeeberplease; thegosinzone; themoskinzone; toesucker; whatareyouwearing; whoslookingoutforyou; wiveswithvibrators
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-279 next last
To: k2blader

I'm not a lawyer. And I'd be insulted if I didn't know you better ;)


121 posted on 10/28/2004 4:18:00 PM PDT by ml1954 (Kerry, A Legend In His Own Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

Loofing out for the folks!


122 posted on 10/28/2004 4:18:01 PM PDT by Ruddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Wow! "Settles" more often than not translates to "Guilty".


123 posted on 10/28/2004 4:18:09 PM PDT by The Toad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
She asked for the settlement. Last week. She folded first. She had no case.

Since we will likely never know, we are both free to sit tight in our opinions.

124 posted on 10/28/2004 4:18:23 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

Sir! I will have you know I don't whizz into the wind - electric fences - now that is another matter.


125 posted on 10/28/2004 4:18:36 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
"Jerkoff traitor Swifty basher.....I'd like to personally kick his arrogant arse."

I'm with you.

126 posted on 10/28/2004 4:18:52 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I don't think so. The settlement terms no doubt dealt with any tapes, which were probably turned over to O'Reilly's attorneys.

I have no doubt that this is so and with honorable parties makes sense but she's a scammer who no doubt has copies, hell I would. So we might see them, who knows? she might burn through the money so it won't matter to her monetarily to release them when she's broke to make more money.

127 posted on 10/28/2004 4:19:24 PM PDT by Lx (If dolphins are so smart, why do they live in igloos?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Destro

>>>Sir! I will have you know I don't whizz into the wind - electric fences - now that is another matter.

Whatever gives you a charge...


128 posted on 10/28/2004 4:19:52 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it - up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: The Toad
Settles" more often than not translates to "Guilty".

Yes. It could mean that Mackris was guilty of extortion. If she had no tapes, then she knew she was going to lose, and might be hit with a big extortion judgment.

129 posted on 10/28/2004 4:20:01 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Years ago, for a fairly short time, Colmes' syndicated radio show played in our area and I thought he was terrible.

Then he went on TV opposite Hannity and I thought, " he's not so bad after all".

130 posted on 10/28/2004 4:20:12 PM PDT by iconoclast (Conservative, not partisan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; sitetest

If she folded first - why did BOR also settle and seal the case? bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


131 posted on 10/28/2004 4:20:26 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Ha! I read that headline and I thought he finally decided who he was going to vote for for President.


132 posted on 10/28/2004 4:21:21 PM PDT by Ima Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

"...all Parties have agreed that there was no wrongdoing whatsoever by Mr. O'Reilly, Ms. Mackris, or Ms. Mackris' counsel,"

Well then, I think it must have been an October Surprise, orchestrated by the Kerry campaign to take the pressure off of Kerry's pathetic "plan" that has flopped to terribly in the public's eye.


133 posted on 10/28/2004 4:21:33 PM PDT by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: RWRbestbyfar

Here's a brief for you, Mr. Lawyer - we don't care about your terminology. O'Reilly's guilty regardless of jargon. Nobody here is foolish enough to believe he admitted to such in his settlement. It doesn't matter, it's clear he's guilty.


134 posted on 10/28/2004 4:21:39 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Then why did she settle? Are we to believe that BOR is a classical gentleman in this case.


135 posted on 10/28/2004 4:22:04 PM PDT by ml1954 (Kerry, A Legend In His Own Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Destro
If she folded first - why did BOR also settle and seal the case? bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

He wants it over. She may have admitted she had nothing.

You just don't know.

But we do know that you adulterate headlines on Free Republic.

136 posted on 10/28/2004 4:22:08 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

> If she had no tapes, ...

Even if she did have tapes, her side did not conduct this
as a harrassment complaint.

BoR keeps his money.
She stays out of jail.

Both reputations trashed.
No tears here.


137 posted on 10/28/2004 4:22:52 PM PDT by Boundless (Was your voter registration sabotaged by ACORN? Don't find out Nov. 2. Vote early.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: ml1954
Then why did she settle? Are we to believe that BOR is a classical gentleman in this case.

Who knows? But we do know (since she blabbed to everybody she could) that she was out to get him.

138 posted on 10/28/2004 4:23:07 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Dear sinkspur,

"She asked for the settlement. Last week. She folded first. She had no case."

Yeah, so what? If you think you can get a few million without having to go to trial over going to trial and getting more, why not take the money and run?

If it were me, I'd rather take a few mill in the hand, no fuss, no muss, then hold out for a chance for more, knowing what I'd be in for.

"Since we will likely never know, we are both free to sit tight in our opinions."

For sure? No.

But, if they didn't pay anything, Fox wants the whole world to know, big time. If they didn't pay anything, then her case was so bad, they didn't have to agree to silence.


sitetest


139 posted on 10/28/2004 4:23:27 PM PDT by sitetest (Why does everyone get so uptight about toasted heretics??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; The Toad
No - more like the tapes were between 2 consenting adults. Since clearly her job was not on the line in relation to accepting BOR's advancement there is no sexual harassment possible. Only BOR on tape talking about vibrators - this he does not want out even if he is innocent of sexual harassment.
140 posted on 10/28/2004 4:23:52 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-279 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson