Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clint N. Suhks
If true, I sure hope this gets legs.

BTTT

3 posted on 10/28/2004 11:26:05 AM PDT by paulcissa (Only YOU can prevent liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: paulcissa

Give it legs people. Start emailing Newscasters, friends, and others.


5 posted on 10/28/2004 11:28:13 AM PDT by Jay777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: paulcissa

I suggest everyone send multiple copies to Sean and Drudge and other media outlets esp. FOX.


6 posted on 10/28/2004 11:28:15 AM PDT by 1smallVoice (Clinton brought us Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: paulcissa

This has been hinted on in this forum for months now. I for one, still cannot understand why John Kerry has not been asked point blank about this. Wouldn't this be part of the public record during the Carter administration regarding his amnesty program for draft dodgers?

We have roughly about 72 hours to pursue this story. I think it is the single most important story because the American people should know whether or not one of the candidates for President did or did not receive an honorable discharge from, in this case, it would be the naval reserves.

nick


8 posted on 10/28/2004 11:30:02 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: paulcissa
He later got an "honorable" separation in 1978, some 12 years after joining the Navy, under President Carter's "Amnesty Program" for draft dodgers

I meant to highlight this.

10 posted on 10/28/2004 11:30:52 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: paulcissa

To All...if there is any way to trace it through the
retired Officer, Hannity will get the job done! He'd
love to be the one to blast Kerry out of the water.


11 posted on 10/28/2004 11:31:22 AM PDT by Grendel9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: paulcissa

One wonders if there's the equivalent of a Daniel Ellsberg in Naval Records? Such a leak without JFK2's Standard Form 180 release would cost someone their career, especially since they must be sure they're the actual papers -- and not from the same (forged) source as Dan Rather's.

We also want to know who wrote the disputed "after action" reports.

There must be some reason why the Bush campaign didn't make a bigger issue out of JFK2 not signing his SF-180? If this comes out -- it had better be incontrovertible.


26 posted on 10/28/2004 11:42:44 AM PDT by kmm526161
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson