One wonders if there's the equivalent of a Daniel Ellsberg in Naval Records? Such a leak without JFK2's Standard Form 180 release would cost someone their career, especially since they must be sure they're the actual papers -- and not from the same (forged) source as Dan Rather's.
We also want to know who wrote the disputed "after action" reports.
There must be some reason why the Bush campaign didn't make a bigger issue out of JFK2 not signing his SF-180? If this comes out -- it had better be incontrovertible.
This is an excerpt from the article I source, (see:
http://www.mlive.com/forums/kalamazoo/index.ssf?artid=16256 )
"There is one odd coincidence that gives some weight to the possibility that Mr. Kerry was dishonorably discharged. Mr. Kerry has claimed that he lost his medal certificates and that is why he asked that they be reissued. But when a dishonorable discharge is issued, all pay benefits, and allowances, and all medals and honors are revoked as well. And five months after Mr. Kerry joined the U.S. Senate in 1985, on one single day, June 4, all of Mr. Kerry's medals were reissued."
I think this is most likely very real. We should DEMAND THROUGH THE VARIOUS MEDIA OUTLETS THAT IN THE CLOSING DAYS OF THIS CAMPAIGN KERRY ADDRESSES THIS ALLEGATION.
MR. KERRY, DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT, OBTAIN AN HONORABLE DISCHARGE FROM THE NAVAL RESERVES? WHERE IS IT?
nick