Posted on 10/28/2004 9:40:03 AM PDT by KMC1
THE WALLS ARE CAVING IN ON HIM: The Kerry people have foolishly decided to run the risk of "running the calendar". In other words they are hoping that time will run out before people that are going to the polls awaken to the fact that Kerry has been lying to them once again, and have the negative backlash.
For their part Kerry's friends at the NewYorkTimes and CBSNews have tried to do their part. The problem is - the truth is getting out.
First - yesterday one of the commanders of the 2nd Brigade of the 101st Airborne strongly refuted the claims made by Kerry out on the campaign trail using the flimsy NYTimes piece as cover.
Second - soldiers of the 3rd Infantry Division AS WELL AS the 101st 2nd Brigade are now on the record stating that they did thorough searches of the Al QaQaa and there were no weapons there.
Third - By continually making these criticisms Kerry is now trying to parce phrases saying he criticized only the President and not the troops. But as you will hear on my show today - the troops are the ones who were responsible for guarding any weapons that may have been found and they are now taking Kerry's criticisms personally.
Fourth - The total amount of the weapons that were even at the facility is now being reported by both ABC News and Fox News ranged from 3 tons to perhaps 158 tons. (Either figure is significantly smaller than the 380 that the NYTimes and John Kerry have been using.)
Fifth - CBS News has now had to admit that it was in fact planning on releasing this as a hit piece on Sunday night originally. Thus not giving the President or any of his team time to respond.
Sixth - Two of Kerry's top advisors have had to admit that they in fact DO NOT know what happened.
Seventh - Bush has responded and is now on the trail letting voters know that John Kerry was willing to use false information, to denigrade the troops, and to manipulate the public - and thus prove Bush's premise that Kerry will say anything to win.
Eighth - According to Bill Gertz it is now entirely likely that some Russian special ops troops were employed by Saddam to remove this stockpile and other stockpiles in the immediate run up to the invasion.
Ninth - Our own defense satellite photos show trucks spiriting away large quantities of something in the days before any of our troops arrived.
Tenth - As of the writing of this entry - Kerry is still repeating the charge of incompetence on the part of our troops and forces.
NOW, I can read it!
THE WALLS ARE CAVING IN ON HIM: The Kerry people have foolishly decided to run the risk of "running the calendar". In other words they are hoping that time will run out before people that are going to the polls awaken to the fact that Kerry has been lying to them once again, and have the negative backlash.
For their part Kerry's friends at the NewYorkTimes and CBSNews have tried to do their part. The problem is - the truth is getting out.
First - yesterday one of the commanders of the 2nd Brigade of the 101st Airborne strongly refuted the claims made by Kerry out on the campaign trail using the flimsy NYTimes piece as cover.
Second - soldiers of the 3rd Infantry Division AS WELL AS the 101st 2nd Brigade are now on the record stating that they did thorough searches of the Al QaQaa and there were no weapons there.
Third - By continually making these criticisms Kerry is now trying to parce phrases saying he criticized only the President and not the troops. But as you will hear on my show today - the troops are the ones who were responsible for guarding any weapons that may have been found and they are now taking Kerry's criticisms personally.
Fourth - The total amount of the weapons that were even at the facility is now being reported by both ABC News and Fox News ranged from 3 tons to perhaps 158 tons. (Either figure is significantly smaller than the 380 that the NYTimes and John Kerry have been using.)
Fifth - CBS News has now had to admit that it was in fact planning on releasing this as a hit piece on Sunday night originally. Thus not giving the President or any of his team time to respond.
Sixth - Two of Kerry's top advisors have had to admit that they in fact DO NOT know what happened.
Seventh - Bush has responded and is now on the trail letting voters know that John Kerry was willing to use false information, to denigrade the troops, and to manipulate the public - and thus prove Bush's premise that Kerry will say anything to win.
Eighth - According to Bill Gertz it is now entirely likely that some Russian special ops troops were employed by Saddam to remove this stockpile and other stockpiles in the immediate run up to the invasion.
Ninth - Our own defense satellite photos show trucks spiriting away large quantities of something in the days before any of our troops arrived.
Tenth - As of the writing of this entry - Kerry is still repeating the charge of incompetence on the part of our troops and forces.
Somehow I doubt that anyone who early-voted for Kerry would see everything going on and wish they hadn't. If they already decided he was a good choice for President, nothing he said then, or is saying now matters.
WOW!!!v What a coincidence!!!!!!!!!! The walls are crashing in on OBAMA also!
"Never interrupt your enemy when he's busy making a mistake." -- Napoleon
I think Kerry would like a good BS sandwich except he doesn't like bread.
Perhaps, but he also knows that early voting is heavy across the country, and those people will vote before the full truth comes out.
What does that mean in real terms? Only gonna win by 40% instead of 45%?
Excellent , concise statement!
The story is obviously an outright lie, orchestrated by the DNC, the UN, The NY Times, CBS, and the kerry campaign. All of them worked together on this and pre-planned what parts each of them would play in getting out this propaganda campaign.
When it was leaked to Drudge, they had to go early with it and give rational people a chance to respond to their lies.
The question is, of course, whether this propaganda is in its nature effective, and whether the fact that it consists of deliberate lies has gotten out to the voters.
NBC helped a little, probably accidentally, but then backed off and tried to deny their story. ABC has pitched in on the leftist side. All the MSM are still going with the story. Only Rush, Drudge, The Washington Times, Fox, and the internet are telling people the real truth.
HUH???
Exciting, how? Was it the debates?
If only I could tell you what is REALLY happening, After the debates folks, including African American pastors are coming out of the woodwork and stepping forward asking how they can help. When you are behind the scenes it is a beautiful thing because one knows what is REALLY going on.
Are you listening to the liberal media MY LORD?? WRONG MOVE!!! Phantom Lord I thought you were SMARTER than that!!
______________________________________________________________________________
 by David HorowitzHardcover - (September 2004) - $27.95 In this tour de force on the most important issue of our time, David Horowitz, confronts the paradox of how so many Americans, including the leadership of the Democratic Party, could turn against the War on Terror. He finds an answer in a political Left that shares a view of America as the “Great Satan” with America’s radical Islamic enemies. In a remarkable exploration of the “Mind of the Left,” Horowitz traces the evolution of American radicalism from its Communist past to its “anti-war” present. He then shows how this Left was able to turn the Democratic Party presidential campaign around and reshape its views on the War on Terror.    |
See this:
No IAEA Seals on Al-Qaqaa Bunkers in KSTP Video
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1260171/posts
ABSOLUTELY!! Folks did not have to depend on the Liberal Media anymore. They saw Keyes with their own eyes.
Read post 15.
what do you mean about obama?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.