Posted on 10/27/2004 9:39:51 PM PDT by anonposter
Oh, I don't think that is why John Zogby changed his mind. I believe he is very biased and have seen him speak on C-Span and does not seem to like George Bush in the least. But, his firm tabulates the 'Weekly Reader Presidential Poll' where on MONDAY (same day he quoted Bush would win) President Bush was announced the winner by school children around the country by a landslide. Weekly Reader has not been wrong since 1956. Follow the link and it shows he tabulates for Weekly Reader.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1256221/posts
LoL....
I know I'd at least consider it.. since she's 100 percent correct, 100 percent of the time..
The problem with female voters is not that they vote from the neck down, which most of them do, but possibly in no greater proportion than the males.
It is that in voting viscerally, they make their choices out of fear, and desire for protection and shelter, where males do not. Hence they unwittingly become the foundation of socialism and the nanny state.
You believe you're right- I suppose that's all that matters. In the end neither men nor woman own the market on stupid reasons to decide on things. Do I think George Bush is a good looking man? As a twenty-six year old woman, yes I do. I also think he is very real looking and yes, that realNESS factors into my decision but it's only a minor part of the overall equation. Men are certainly NOT better decision makers and really God help us all if ONLY men were allowed to vote.
You understand Hillary is going to be elected 4 years from now, and its going to be women who are responsible for putting her in office.
At that time,you'll hear a lot worse on this site than that which I posted.
Not all woman are complete twits with no brains...the media would just have you believe such and so would NOW and all those other moron so-called Women's Rights Orgs that have done more to opress women than anyone else ever could. I don't believe that most sensible women are all that enamored of Hillary either but you'll never hear the media admit that...she's still a far left socialist psycho Dem...as for this site becoming a woman bashing zone..that would be too bad as there are likely many many women here such as myself that would be terribly upset by that.
Oh lighten up sir. His looks have no influence on me on why I'm voting for him. It's just fun pointing it out.
I don't consider it bashing, and never said ALL women were shallow.
Not trying to start a fight, I just don't understand those who would select a politician based on anything other than politics.
Yes,idiots of both sexes will decide this election; but Kerry and the Mommy party are going to win the female vote even though an American city may disappear in a matter of years. I find that incredible and terrifying.
I would hope you vote for better reasons.
I'm 56 and it's one of my life goals to be shallow and superficial. I think that the effete intellectual lefties are the bane of this country. All I really need to know is, my redeemer lives. After that, the rest is simple.
Of course I am, good grief. Whats wrong with you people!
He's pro life, so am I; he believes in preemptive action against terrorists, so do I, he believes in tax cuts, so do I, etc.
Are you happy now?
Ok just checking.
You're delusional. Mrs clinton is the most hated woman in the US. I predict she'll lose her senate relection bid and be out of the running before the primaries start in 08.
Remember that the power of the old media is broken and that the truth will get out. Her allies at the alphabets or the clinton news network can't protect her any more
"The truth getting out" and "a successful clinton in politics" are mutually exclusive
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.