Posted on 10/27/2004 12:43:03 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln
VANCOUVER, British Columbia, October 27/04 -- Unlike Election 2000 between George “W” Bush and Al “I Invented The Letter W” Gore, I predict that the race between Bush and John Kerry is not going to end in a photo-finish. This time, I don’t believe that the fate of the nation and the free world will be decided by a handful of senile, incontinent old geezers wheeled out from under a pile of mothballs in some Fort Lauderdale retirement home and straight into the polling booth. Nevertheless, desperate times lead to desperate measures, and in the last stretch of this marathon race, the
‘spinsanity’ has kicked into overdrive.
The battle between conservatism and liberalism can be summed up as one of fact vs. rhetoric. It’s why former British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, once said: “If you are not a liberal at age 20, you have no heart. If you are not a conservative at age 40, you have no brain.” Kerry campaign tactics being used in the waning days of this election perfectly illustrate this sentiment as he trots out every no-brain Hollywood celebrity with a pulse. How can facts ever compete with hysterics like:
“If you want rape to be legal, then don’t vote.” (Cameron Diaz);
“And the rich, corporate, horrible, horrible people who have been destructing and ruining everything this country was made on has been really unbelievably damaging to all of us spiritually, emotionally, monetarily.” (Rosie O’Donnell, who has suffered a net gain of millions under Bush’s Evil Empire)
“All the gay guys, all my friends, all my gay friends, you guys you have got to vote, alright? Because it would only be a matter of time before you guys would be so screwed, I cannot tell you. Because, you know, the people, like, in the very right wing of this party, of these Republicans, the very very right wing, the Jerry Falwell element, if they get any more power, you guys are going to be living in some state by yourselves.” (Cher, looking out for Mary Cheney)
Kerry campaign mascot, Ben Affleck, has figured prominently in Kerry’s final days, as has Bruce Springsteen and Sharon Stone, who blamed President Bush back in August for creating a climate in which she wasn’t given the green light for a lesbian love scene with Halle Berry in the
movie “Catwoman.”
When you turn to the Screen Actors Guild directory, and you roll Bill Clinton -- America’s first ‘black’ President -- off his gurney in the cardiac rehab ward to go stumping for you amongst the bruthas and sistas, you’ve pretty much acknowledged that your campaign can’t possibly count on
using mere facts to win.
The Kerry strategy now seems to consist of nothing more than churning out as much slime and bald-faced lies as it can, while praying that the public will be stupid enough to allow some of it to stick. A New York Times story came out this week suggesting that 380 tons of deadly explosives in Iraq disappeared under Bush’s watch. Reports differ as to whether the weapons went missing before or after the US invasion. This isn’t really the issue. In any case, their disappearance proves once and for all that Saddam Hussein had deadly weapons, that they were mobile, and that they could have been passed off to terrorists at any time. All this shows is that Bush was right in having gone in and removed Hussein from power, and that the world is now a much safer place.
John Kerry is making the weapons issue the focus of an ad blitz this week. According to Kerry logic, people are now supposed to be scared to death of the weapons that Saddam apparently never had, and which Bush then failed
to secure when he went in after these non-existent weapons. What are the odds that this guy can send a strong message to terrorists when he even has difficulty sending a strong, consistent message from one side of his brain to the other?
And right on cue, actress/singer/liberal shill Barbra Streisand sticks her nose into the issue. Despite the fact that the missing weapons issue proves Bush’s point about WMDs in Iraq, that hasn’t stopped Babs from SCREAMING on her website, in BIG BOLD LETTERS: “BUSH FAILED TO SECURE NEARLY 400 TONS OF KNOWN, DEADLY EXPLOSIVES IN IRAQ, AND NOW THEY MAY FALL INTO THE WRONG HANDS TO BE USED TO BLOW UP AIRPLANES, LEVEL BUILDINGS AND DETONATE NUCLEAR WEAPONS.”
None of this makes any sense coming from someone who keeps harping on about Bush’s “imaginary weapons of mass destruction”, but WHO CARES! LOOK AT ME! I CAN SING AND ACT! I CAN MAKE MY BOOBS DISAPPEAR IN THE MOVIE YENTIL, BUT I CAN’T PUT TOGETHER A LOGICAL ARGUMENT TO SAVE MY LIFE!
As a political pundit, I would have enjoyed witnessing a battle of rational ideas between Bush and Kerry. By no means has Bush done everything perfectly over the past four years. I’ve made no secret of the fact that I personally disagree with him on issues ranging from certain provisions of the Patriot Act to his policy on illegal immigration. Kerry,
however, has neglected to capitalize on Bush’s biggest weaknesses and, with his changing priorities and inconsistent messaging, has failed to make himself into anything more than an ankle-biter to Bush’s big dog. Kerry’s campaign is to blame, but the buck stops with the candidate. If Kerry can’t even run his own campaign, then he can’t realistically be expected to manage an entire country and the rest of the free world in a time of war.
Yes, Superman died, and people are getting the flu. In a rational, non-politically charged climate, these things wouldn’t normally be blamed on a sitting President. Kerry has one last hope this week to defeat fact and logic with outright lies about Bush. As he runs around the country in
this last week armed with everything from a gun to a dead goose, pandering to everyone in sight, it becomes obvious that his only hope lies in the ability of voters to assimilate toxic levels of BS. In the final analysis, the people will get exactly the President they deserve.
Rachel Marsden (rachelmarsden.com) is a public affairs and communications strategist, columnist and talk show host who has worked in politics and media in the United States and Canada.
Nothing stopping the ladies from having their own rules..
This I've got to see. Could you FReepmail me the link?
Thank you, Lando and others.
I say YES - we need a Rachel Marsden photo rule to match the one we have for the lovely Ann.
I could happily look at many, many more pictures of Rachel.
I find what you wrote very politically incorrect.
(I understand in some places, the previous sentence would be construed as criticism. But this is FR, so it's my way of saying "that's great!")
And tell Kim Jong-Il that as long as John Kerry be wit Theresa, he no get close to being erected.
Let's see, so far the Dems have said Bush will reinstate the draft, cut social security, legalize rape, reinstate Jim Crow laws, turn firehoses on black children, imprison gays in concentration camps, cancel the elections, add mercury to water, and create more hurricanes. But it is the Republicans who are running a campaign of fear . . .
He's also Snowball.
Too late.
Because, you know, the people, like, in the very right wing of this party, of these Republicans, the very very right wing, the Jerry Falwell element, if they get any more power, you guys are going to be living in some state by yourselves.”
This is just what they want. The state of Assachusetts maybe?
Wow...Rachel is...nice.
Lando 
Will Canada take Susan Estrich in trade? We can throw in Maureen Dowd as well if that will clinch the deal.
Lando
Here's the FR post about the billboards.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1258733/posts
Thank you. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.