You think he was shooting for nuance? The way I see it, today he's got to straighten out the civil union, missing explosives and emergency funding firebombs. And here I thought we had maybe made it through the October surpise deadline.
I fail to see any of these as "firebombs," but maybe that's just wishful thinking on your part.
I see you missed the news last night that NBC's embedded reporter was with the troops when they came to the weapons site in April 2003 and they were already missing. Also the UN had gone to the site in March 2003 and they were gone, then. Believe me, the "missing explosives" has backfired, big time, in the dems' exploitive faces.
And BTW, this civil union stance is not new, so to pretend you don't know it or be ignorant of that is one thing. To claim he is saying something different now is flat out wrong.