Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1stMarylandRegiment; 1Mike; 3catsanadog; ~Vor~; ~Kim4VRWC's~; A CA Guy; A Citizen Reporter; ...

Oh, look at this!!!!!!


8 posted on 10/25/2004 11:36:48 PM PDT by Howlin (Bush has claimed two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin

Dan Rather must be kicking the NYT typesetters right in the keister. The NYT blew the planned event too soon.


16 posted on 10/25/2004 11:40:34 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (If you're for civil unions, you're for gay marriage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

Gee ... any guesses on who shopped this story??


19 posted on 10/25/2004 11:41:22 PM PDT by Mo1 (This Sept 10th attitude is no way to protect our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Woooooooooo hoooooooooooo...even MORE dots to connect.Solmeone better make a thread with all of the links to this story,so that they're all in one spot.

Time to send this info out to everyone we know and to the rest of the media.

38 posted on 10/25/2004 11:49:10 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
The source behind the NYT story first went to CBSNEWS' 60 MINUTES last Wednesday, but the beleaguered network wasn't able to get the piece on the air as fast as the newspaper could print. Executive producer Jeff Fager hoped to break the story during a high-impact election eve broadcast of 60 MINS on October 31.


170 posted on 10/26/2004 2:15:51 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe; PhilDragoo; devolve
The source behind the NYT story first went to CBSNEWS' 60 MINUTES last Wednesday, but the beleaguered network wasn't able to get the piece on the air as fast as the newspaper could print. Executive producer Jeff Fager hoped to break the story during a high-impact election eve broadcast of 60 MINS on October 31.

bump!!


171 posted on 10/26/2004 2:16:51 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

OMG! They have more than outted themselves this year.


181 posted on 10/26/2004 3:43:20 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin; Mo1

Yeah, I heard that CBS had their paws in this too.

From what I heard there was a CBS and NTY reporter in Baghdad that was working on this story.


186 posted on 10/26/2004 4:05:40 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

well, well, Rathergate II


193 posted on 10/26/2004 4:10:14 AM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

This also has U.N. fingerprints all over it. Anything to defeat Bush while simultaneously taking the attention off of oil-for-food scandal.


194 posted on 10/26/2004 4:10:52 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin; Mo1

In view of the NBC embed reporters statement, Dan Blather might be feeling that he just dodged another bullet right now.

Prairie


220 posted on 10/26/2004 5:33:49 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Iraq had WMD. End of story.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin; weegee; Jinjelsnaps; President_Leary

We are living in the most remarkable time where we everyday citizens are able to expose the MSM's attempts to:

*influence an election;
*in perilous times, put our soldiers at risk and make them objects of ridicule for perceived incompetence
*openly collude with a political party (CBS>Lockhart) to influence an election
*broadcast a story based on forgeries

The frightening aspect to this is, how often were the MSM able to get away with this?

We are members of the new check and balance system to the MSM. Afforded us through technology (Internet) and rise of talk radio and cable news we are able to instantly refute, investigate and check their supposed facts.

Happy to be aligned with the new check and balance system of Free Republic, Rush, Hannity, Drudge, FOX news, et al.

Thank you for the pings!


288 posted on 10/26/2004 9:55:53 AM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson