Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Darancette

I was just about to post the same story. I had to re-search Lexis Nexis with al Qa Qaa instead of al Qaqaa.

Darn spelling.

Most interesting article.

I'm wondering if this isn't leading up to a surprise twist on this story. It seems this facility may have had WMD.


38 posted on 10/25/2004 12:56:56 PM PDT by eyespysomething (Idealism is fine, but as it approaches reality the cost becomes prohibitive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: eyespysomething
It seems this facility may have had WMD.

Doesn't matter whether it did or not. Kerry/Edwards and the MSM are telling us that the explosives include material used to detonate nuclear weapons. They are calling it in favor of WMD.

And we now know they (the explosives/WMD) were gone when we got there in April '03, which means that Hussein gave them over to someone else in order to protect them from falling into our hands.

Sorta makes the Hussein/Terrorism link, wouldn't you say?

50 posted on 10/25/2004 1:44:58 PM PDT by HiJinx (Support Our Troops! www.ProudPatriots.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: eyespysomething; Mike Darancette
It was part of the nuclear program at Al Qaqaa. The explosives was for blasting fissile material. They had some special projects there too.
106 posted on 10/25/2004 11:05:57 PM PDT by endthematrix (10 out of 10 terrorists agree-Anybody but Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson