Posted on 10/25/2004 3:59:18 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
(AP) Several hundred tons of conventional explosives are missing from a former Iraqi military facility that once played a key role in Saddam Hussein's efforts to build a nuclear bomb, the U.N. nuclear agency confirmed Monday.
International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei will report the materials' disappearance to the U.N. Security Council later Monday, spokeswoman Melissa Fleming told The Associated Press.
"On Oct. 10, the IAEA received a declaration from the Iraqi Ministry of Science and Technology informing us that approximately 350 tons of high explosive material had gone missing," Fleming said.
In Washington, Democratic presidential hopeful John Kerry's campaign said the Bush administration "must answer for what may be the most grave and catastrophic mistake in a tragic series of blunders in Iraq."
"How did they fail to secure ... tons of known, deadly explosives despite clear warnings from the International Atomic Energy Agency to do so?" senior Kerry adviser Joe Lockhart said in a statement.
The Iraqis told the nuclear agency the materials had been stolen and looted because of a lack of security at governmental installations, Fleming said.
"We do not know what happened to the explosives or when they were looted," she told AP.
Nearly 380 tons of powerful explosives that could be used to build large conventional bombs are missing from the former Al Qaqaa military installation, The New York Times reported Monday.
The explosives included HMX and RDX, which can be used to demolish buildings but also produce warheads for missiles and detonate nuclear weaponry, the newspaper said. It said they disappeared after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq last year.
Bush's national security adviser, Condoleeza Rice, was informed of the missing explosives in the past month, the report said. It said Iraq's interim government recently warned the United States and U.N. nuclear inspectors that the explosives had vanished.
"Upon receiving the declaration on Oct. 10, we first took measures to authenticate it," Fleming said. "Then on Oct. 15, we informed the multinational forces through the U.S. government with the request for it to take any appropriate action in cooperation with Iraq's interim government."
"Mr. ElBaradei wanted to give them some time to recover the explosives before reporting this loss to the Security Council, but since it's now out, ElBaradei plans to inform the Security Council today" in a letter to the council president, she said.
There was no immediate explanation for the discrepancy between the IAEA's figure of 350 tons and the newspaper's estimate of nearly 380 tons.
Before the war, inspectors with the Vienna-based IAEA had kept tabs on the so-called "dual use" explosives because they could have been used to detonate a nuclear weapon.
IAEA inspectors pulled out of Iraq just before the 2003 invasion and have not yet been able to return despite ElBaradei's repeated urging that the experts be allowed back in to finish their work.
ElBaradei told the U.N. Security Council before the war that Iraq's nuclear program was in disarray and that there was no evidence to suggest it had revived efforts to build atomic weaponry.
Al Qaqaa, a sprawling former military installation about 30 miles south of Baghdad, was placed under U.S. military control but repeatedly has been looted, raising troubling questions about whether the missing explosives have fallen into the hands of insurgents battling coalition forces.
Saddam was known to have used the site to make conventional warheads, and IAEA inspectors dismantled parts of his nuclear program there before the 1991 Gulf War. The experts also oversaw the destruction of Iraq's chemical and biological weapons.
The nuclear agency pulled out of Iraq in 1998, and by the time it returned in 2002, it confirmed that 35 tons of HMX that had been placed under IAEA seal were missing. HMX and RDX are the key components in plastic explosives, which insurgents have widely used in a series of bloody car bombings in Iraq.
"These explosives can be used to blow up airplanes, level buildings, attack our troops and detonate nuclear weapons," Lockhart said.
"The Bush administration knew where this stockpile was, but took no action to secure the site. They were urgently and specifically informed that terrorists could be helping themselves to the most dangerous explosives bonanza in history, but nothing was done to prevent it from happening," he said.
"This material was monitored and controlled by U.N. inspectors before the invasion of Iraq. Thanks to the stunning incompetence of the Bush administration, we now have no idea where it is," Lockart said. He demanded the White House explain "why they failed to safeguard these explosives and keep them out of the hands of our enemies."
ElBaradei told the United Nations in February 2003 that Iraq had declared that "HMX previously under IAEA seal had been transferred for use in the production of industrial explosives, primarily to cement plants as a booster for explosives used in quarrying."
"However, given the nature of the use of high explosives, it may well be that the IAEA will be unable to reach a final conclusion on the end use of this material," ElBaradei warned at the time.
"A large quantity of these explosives were under IAEA seal because they do have a nuclear application," Fleming said Monday.
The nuclear agency has no concrete evidence to suggest the seals were broken, Fleming said, but a diplomat familiar with the agency's work in Iraq said the seals must have been broken if the explosives were stolen.
________________________________
The UN be involved in a money scandal? No way, just no way.
I remember Blix saying that they were progressing well before the UN was kicked out of Iraq, then we didn't hear much from the bumbling fool until he retired.
Yep, now the question is will that dog hunt?
This'll backfire on the Democrats.
"...Composition C4: 91% RDX, 9% non-explosive plasticizers. This compound is used in mines and hand grenades..."
The material missing is not esoteric material. These are common military explosives.
Why they did not destroy the bunker in the first place is another question, but not one on a Presidential level.
And all this time the left and the partisan media have insisted there were NO WMD. I guess they CAN have it both ways.
Maybe the Dems stole the WMD........Hmmmmm....LOL
Latest Zogby Tracking Shows Big Shift for Bush (Monday, 25 October, 2004)
I think the elction will be over my midnight, Nov. 2nd, thingumbob. With President Bush as the clear winner.
The Dems got way too much attention with their NAACP/ACORN/Get Out The Vote Campaign.
Too many city papers have written about record-breaking voter turn-out (Often far exceeding the Census) Plus incidents of Fraudulent and forged Voter Registration Cards for the Dem ploy to work very well.
Jack.
I suppose the US was working with the Iraqis to guard the site, and it is always necessary to work with native personnel to help liberate a country - if you are truly liberating it, which the US is, and not conquering it. My suspicion is that the theft, to the degree it occurred, was facilitated by Iraqi inside help.
Now here comes the position Kerry always takes and the media never calls him on: he will say the US should not have "outsourced" part of the effort of guarding the site to Iraqis, just like he said we should not have "outsourced" part of our effort at Tora Bora. Well, if we had gone it alone, he would have accused the US of imperialism and not building a coalition.
To grant a country liberty, you have to give them the opportunity to succedd or fail through their own efforts. I am sorry this has made Iraq more dangerous, but it is a necessary step if they are not to be simply a US colony in the Middle East.
The media should ask Kerry how many men he would have drafted to provide a 100% US effort, or what he would have given to France and Russia, above and beyond Oil-for-Food graft money, to get them to send troops. He has no answer, and if he did, France and Russia would immediately rebut it.
Lots of hype on this one.
You make a lot of good points. Including your tagline.
There's more to this story, I'm sure we'll hear the rest of it from Rush today. LIMBAUGH/HANNITY '08
I like this headline better.
"Tons Of US Explosives Missing In Iraq"
Er....
Yes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.