Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hartford Courant: Re-Elect President Bush (I don't believe it!)
Hartford Courant ^ | 10.24.04

Posted on 10/24/2004 8:59:56 PM PDT by mhking

As in many past elections, Americans are closely divided over who should be the next president. It's not a clear-cut case of one candidate being far superior to the other. Yet history is not made by those who stand on the sidelines and wring their hands. The people must choose on Nov. 2, and The Courant recommends George W. Bush over John F. Kerry.

(Excerpt) Read more at ctnow.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: endorsement; endorsements; fourmoreyears; gwb2004; hartfordcourant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: CyberAnt
I know what you mean .. 4 very lefty papers in in CALIFORNIA have endorsed Bush. I've been in shock most of the day.

This Hartford Courant endorsement is the other bookend of the Austin Statesman American.

Just . . . . . wow.

21 posted on 10/24/2004 9:36:32 PM PDT by Petronski (On the land in the air on the sea, let's swing out to Victory. --Fats Waller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

"Mr. Kerry's insistence that he can accomplish his four-point plan faster and better than Mr. Bush is not persuasive. Although Mr. Kerry may be a more sympathetic figure in Europe and other regions traditionally friendly to the United States, that doesn't mean he can talk foreign governments into committing troops and treasure to Iraq in the quantities needed to supplant Americans.

We agree with the Democratic nominee on some key issues. Like him, we favor abortion rights, gun control, strong environmental protection and the provision of health care coverage to the millions without it.

Yet opinions without the leadership ability to bring them to fruition matter little. Mr. Kerry has been in the Senate for 19 years and has passed few if any major pieces of legislation bearing his name. He is a loner. He has not developed a strong bipartisan network in the upper chamber. There's not much evidence to suggest that the Democratic nominee would as president have the clout and discipline needed to guide his agenda through a sharply divided Congress, regardless of its merits.

Further, it's doubtful that taxpayers could afford the cost of some of Mr. Kerry's ideas."


22 posted on 10/24/2004 9:37:52 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

bump....this is just one of the best endorsements I have read. Intelligent, sharp....very well done.

They don't agree with Bush on everything, but, they even give him domestic props. Well done piece.


23 posted on 10/24/2004 9:42:30 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mhking

I think it is the PERFECT ENDORSEMENT! This is a liberal paper that points out what it believes to be the President's weakness yet is not BLIND to his successes. They also get it that, "IT"S THE WAR ON TERROR STUPID" versus the "Its the ECONOMY STUPID" of elections gone by. EXCELLENT ARTICLE.


24 posted on 10/24/2004 9:44:26 PM PDT by elizabetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking

Perhaps cultural LIBERALS are starting to think

"Gee, maybe Gay Marriage, getting sex ed in schools, and socialized medicine can wait while we let a REAL LEADER take on and finish the global terrorist threat. My life is a bit more important than changing social conventions."

The - "Keep Bush because of terrorism" - that was more or less the take of the Austin American Statemen (aka Unamerican spacemen). "Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz have to go" they said. And their 'endorsement' had more whines than praises ... But Bush can stay, because turning him out would send the wrong signal to terrorists, and Bush's leadership is superior to Kerry's.

AMAZING.

If voters listen, then the country will deliver a blowout victory for Bush, ensuring that TERRORISTS HEAR LOUD AND CLEAR THAT WE WILL NOT BE DETERRED, AND THEY WILL BE DEFEATED.


25 posted on 10/24/2004 9:45:00 PM PDT by WOSG (George W Bush / Dick Cheney - Right for our Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: mhking

27 posted on 10/24/2004 9:50:00 PM PDT by dancusa (Kerry is a phoney and a poseur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking

What a comment from CT!:

"Post-attack, however, Americans couldn't have asked more of the president. His strong, calm leadership soothed a shattered and uncertain people."

And Christians from all over this country should take heart and get back into our society. Be the salt.


28 posted on 10/24/2004 9:58:15 PM PDT by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking

I am shocked that liberal rag sheet has endorsed Bush. Every columnist save one (Laurence Cohen), hates Bush. The whole paper is edited in an anti-Iraq war fashion. Tou got to read this article written today by Helen Ubinas(the racism is everywhere columnist). Her amazement at this is palpable.http://www.ctnow.com/hc-ubinas1024.artoct24,1,1792293.story?coll=hc-big-headlines-breaking


29 posted on 10/24/2004 10:05:06 PM PDT by dancusa (Kerry is a phoney and a poseur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dancusa

This is not "shocking", the Courant endorsed Bush in 2000 and CT is after all, a state that lost many citizens to the islamofascists on 9/11.


30 posted on 10/24/2004 10:07:22 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Always ask yourself, does this pass the Global Test?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

I am just in shock. Some of these libs heard that "globalism talk" folks. They know Kerry up there, they know he means it and they are scared to death. Even Dems have families and want thier kids to have a country in the future. They know Kerry cannot handle what lies ahead. Bush may not take the state but this is a very telling.


31 posted on 10/24/2004 10:11:32 PM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I realized that they endorsed Bush in 2000. But I get that paper (at least the sports section is good). My blood pressure goes up after reading the A section. I have go to Free Republic to get the real unfiltered news to calm down.
32 posted on 10/24/2004 10:18:25 PM PDT by dancusa (Kerry is a phoney and a poseur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Cultural and Liberal seems like a contradiction of terms. Guess the Kool-aid didn't get to them huh?


33 posted on 10/24/2004 10:28:22 PM PDT by conshack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dancusa

This dovetails with bush being up 1 in UCONN poll (if true)

One HUGE reason rational connecticut residents may end up voting AGAINST Kerry - He is a THREAT to their JOBS

1 - Defense contractors number 1 in employment - United Technologies (HQ, Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Engines, Hamilton Sunstrand, Sikorsky Helicopters, Norden Systems); Electric Boat; General Electric; Kaman Helicopters; Groton Naval Shipyard; plus all the subcontracting base for these companies - Even Dodd has to be a hawk in terms of defense spending

2 - Insurance companies probably still #2 employer (Travelers, Aetna, Cigna.......) - Nationalize healthcare is not in CT's best interest....


34 posted on 10/24/2004 10:28:44 PM PDT by tejasyank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tejasyank

Thanks for the info and welcome to Free Republic!


35 posted on 10/24/2004 10:34:01 PM PDT by dancusa (Kerry is a phoney and a poseur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mhking

BTTT


36 posted on 10/24/2004 10:50:07 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
The Desert Sun in the heart of very, very liberal Palm Springs and what I consider a liberal paper came out today with a full page endorsement of Bush. I was absolutely shocked.

And it was a very good editiorial. Made a very good case why we should not switch leaders at this time. Worth a read.

We are not supposed to link directly but you can get to it here.

Just one extra click.

37 posted on 10/24/2004 10:55:56 PM PDT by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking

I'm shocked. I lived in Hartford and a couple of surrounding towns for 10 years.

I wonder if Colin McEnroe knows.


38 posted on 10/25/2004 12:21:11 AM PDT by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mhking

Unless you're extremely gifted for your age, you were probably alive when they endorsed W in 2000...


39 posted on 10/25/2004 12:48:37 AM PDT by uberPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mhking; Lil'freeper

Are ewe series?


40 posted on 10/25/2004 3:46:04 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought."-Pope JPII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson