Indecision on Iraq. Indecision on the terrorists. That is what Kerry has to offer. The Americans are in danger of letting the American Zapatero deceive them like they were deceived by the wobbly Jimmy Carter in 1976.
Will this article lead to the endorsement of President Bush by the Washington Post?
Real CinC material there all right. NOT.
just like he said he would be glad to come on the O'Reilly Factor..and never has...
Golly, Bob really nails Kerry for avoiding the interview...
Cowardly is as Cowardly does.
This should be a lesson learned for the Republicans. Even if you answer the Washington Post's questions on the most important issue of the election and your Democratic opponent doesn't, the Washington Post will still endorse the Democrat.
He would have started answering Woodward's 22 questions stating he was against the war and by question 22 he would have flipped flopped back to support for the war. There is no way he can remain consistent.
Hey Bob - you're supposed to be an investigative journalist, so ask Kerry about his plan to win friends & influence at the UN - by throwing Israel to the wolves.
Since Bob Woodward is the darling of the MSM, I wonder how much play this little tidbit will receive on CNNCBSABCNBC... any?
Bob Woodward is a real creep.
Kerry THE COWARD has no plan for IRAQ:
This is a President Bush Talking Point.
Email this to:
I think this article, with its list of things Bush did or did not do, is really intended to point out Bush's failures. It's just that the only way he could do this was to start out by appearing to be down on John Kerry for not accepting the interview. By the time the reader completes the piece, he'll be ranting about Bush, not Kerry.
Question 23.
Why haven't you signed the SF180?
Why haven't you answered questions about your discharge?
Best laugh I have had in a long time.
Well, permit me to say that this is a REALLY WIMPY HEADLINE, which does NOT inform readers that Kerry refused to talk about Iraq.
The article, too, is constructed so you have to read down into the third paragraph before you begin to understand what it is about--namely that Kerry dodged answering any questions.
I think Woodward let kerry off very easy with this.
"Would Kerry Have Done Things Differently?"
Why the title Bob? You asking us? It's your job to find out, your the reporter remember. The American public have been trying to figure that one out for quite some time. What's wrong, no deep throat to help you out.
Woodward should have blasted skerry for not doing the interview but he completely let him off the hook, just like the rest of the MSM. Worthless.
Portrait Of A True Leader!
At least Woodward brings a little bit of attention to this. John Kerry has gone through this election cycle without subjecting himself to anything more difficult than a Jon Stewart *ss-kissing interview for laughs. The press has ignored any vetting of this candidate: his 20+ year record in congress, his VVAW stuff, his many "plans", and all the lies he's been throwing about W.
Way to go, MSM. You've proven what you're good for: nothing.
