I think this article, with its list of things Bush did or did not do, is really intended to point out Bush's failures. It's just that the only way he could do this was to start out by appearing to be down on John Kerry for not accepting the interview. By the time the reader completes the piece, he'll be ranting about Bush, not Kerry.
I agree with you. The questions as worded cannot be answered by an opponent, who has not been in the situation of actually making the decisions.
These questions are digs at the decisions made by Bush all along the way. - not consulting with certain people - not listening to other people, eg Powell - secret transfers of money - and on and on
I agree with you. The questions as worded cannot be answered by an opponent, who has not been in the situation of actually making the decisions.
These questions are digs at the decisions made by Bush all along the way. - not consulting with certain people - not listening to other people, eg Powell - secret transfers of money - and on and on