Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/23/2004 8:02:07 AM PDT by Chrysler813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: qam1

ping


2 posted on 10/23/2004 8:11:03 AM PDT by kenth (Hollow plan from the Hollow Man...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813

Can I please be an honorary Gen X-er? I was born in June 1961, and am just six months shy of the cut-off date. I have nothing in common the baby boomers!!


5 posted on 10/23/2004 8:33:34 AM PDT by Siouxz (Freepers are the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813
I always thought it was 1965-1981. At least that's how Strauss and Howe (authors of Generations and other similar books) define it, and they have no obvious political axe to grind.
6 posted on 10/23/2004 8:42:23 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813

So, are you saying the boom started at the beginning of WWII and not the end? I had always heard the boom started when the men came home from the war (with all of that pent up demand) and was a 20 year phenomenon, making Gen X 1965-1985.


7 posted on 10/23/2004 8:44:14 AM PDT by seowulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813
The real dates?

You mean like the real value of g is 9.8 m/s^2 or the real number of centimeters in one meter is 100?

That kind of real?

Of course you don't. Labels like "Generation X" and "Baby Boomers" are just that - labels. They're not "real". This argument is just plain silly.

9 posted on 10/23/2004 9:15:52 AM PDT by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813
Can you give us the data on your research for the dates 1962-1981. Although I was born in 1967 and feel blessed by the tag of Generation X, I am a bit confoozed as to why the off-beat numbers of '62-'81. But then I always have played it loose with numbers and rounded things out just to make it simple for myself.

Is '62 the year of a marked birth-rate drop? And is '81 a year of marked birth-rate increase? Just curious, because it would seem to me that things would fluctuate in a 2-4 year pattern rather than a 20 year gap.

Just curious about a subject I know little about (statistics).

10 posted on 10/23/2004 9:19:32 AM PDT by Alkhin ("We are not this story's author, who fills time and eternity with his purpose." G.W.Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813
Stereotyping about Generation-This and Generation-That is based on the spurious idea that a person's beliefs, tastes, and preferences are determined primarily by his birth date. It is a way of setting one group of Americans against another, much like the Marxists' pernicious "theories" of class warfare.
13 posted on 10/23/2004 9:30:01 AM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813; qam1

Generation X started when John F. Kennedy was killed on Nov 22, 1963 and ended when Ronald Reagan was sworn into office on Jan 20, 1981.

That's all there is to it!


26 posted on 10/23/2004 10:44:15 AM PDT by Incorrigible (immanentizing the eschaton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813
Generation X should've been named Generation I.

I, I, I, I, I. The self-absorbed generation.

30 posted on 10/23/2004 11:04:07 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813

This is the best news I have heard all day. Born in 1962, it warms my heart to know I am NOT a baby boomer. I never felt like one anyway. I'll stick with the Xers thank-you very much!
Generation X and proud of it!


34 posted on 10/23/2004 4:09:04 PM PDT by Wonderama (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813

Thank you!!

I'm not as "old" an X er as I thought I was. I kept reading that it started in 66.


36 posted on 10/23/2004 4:23:29 PM PDT by Gal.5:1 (proud Xer born in '67)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813
I am sorry, but the late ending date for "Generation X" is a newer innovation. It was originally '62-'69 or maybe a little later. But I remember, when I first started hearing the term "Generation X" I was to young to be in that group. By the early to mid 90s, they basically started using the term Generation X, for anyone who was too young to be a baby boomer.

People on this thread are using these terms like there is something scientific to them. In reality, there is no magic dividing lines- the closest thing to that would be something like the end of the War.

37 posted on 10/23/2004 4:36:17 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813
The reason why 1965 is chosen is because that's when the Baby Boom ended and the birth rates collasped

1975 is often given for the year Gen-X ends because 1976 birth rates started to increase again but 1982 is usually given for the start of Gen-Y because kids born in that year would have became adults/graduated high school in 2000 (hence their other nickname Millennials)

BTW, See my homepage I have the names of the Generations going back to Columbus

43 posted on 10/23/2004 6:38:11 PM PDT by qam1 (McGreevy likes his butts his way, I like mine my way - so NO SMOKING BANS in New Jersey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813

Hmmm...I am at a total loss now...DOB 61 puts me on the edge of the BB gen, yet I feel so Gen-X having embraced technology and computer programing...

The conflict is destroying my sense of self and identity...

I just want to sign up on the next Tuna boat leaving port...I cant handle it


58 posted on 10/23/2004 11:21:53 PM PDT by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813

I was born in '61 and always considered myself NOT a part of the Boomer generation, and all my friends are Xers. I didn't have to worry about the Vietnam draft (ended when I was 11), and numerous other things boomers consider their rite of passage, simply don't apply to me. If anything, Gen X should be expanded to 1960, not contracted to the '70s.


71 posted on 10/25/2004 8:12:51 AM PDT by AnalogReigns ("My conscience is captive to the word of God...to go against conscience is neither right nor safe. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chrysler813

FINALLY! I am so tired of being lumped in with the Boomers (no offense to all the FR boomers who obviously were able to move past the 60's). I was born in '64 and my idealogy, beliefs and experiences fall squarely in the X gen. /rant


95 posted on 10/26/2004 4:09:34 PM PDT by FightforFreedomCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson