ACLU Comes Down on the Side of the Terrorists

CNN ^ | October 22, 2004 | Associated Press

[Publius Valerius]

xceptions have been made in wartime.

Yes, this is true. But I feel that those exceptions were wrongly made. And, apparently, so does the ACLU.

[appalachian_dweller]

Off topic:

Since you're such a big fan of the Bill of Rights, what's your take on gun ownership?

[appalachian_dweller]

I wrote: The Bill of Rights applies to US Citizens ONLY.

You wrote: I take issue with this assertion.

And you backed up you assertion very nicely. Good research. According to your previous post, I am wrong.

However, we are at war. In time of war, civil rights and even constitutional rights can be suspended.

OPNION:
You seem to be defending the jihadis who're trying to destroy this country. I take issue with that.

Not much else I can say to change your mind and you're certainly not going to change mine so we'll just have to agree to disagree.

[Publius Valerius]

I think that the United States has no legitimate authority to regulate the private ownership of firearms.

To paraphrase Vin Suprynowicz, if a 14 year old girl wants to walk into Home Depot and buy a chain-fed, fully automatic machine gun and pay cash, there should be no identification to check, no background check to pass, no waiting period to expire, no taxes to pay, and no registration to fill out.

A more difficult question is whether states can legitimately regulate private ownership of firearms. Ultimately I think the answer is no, since I am of the belief that the Bill of Rights binds the individual states as well as the Federal government.

[freeeee]

the IRS audit could do them in .....

Bill Clinton, what are you doing posting on FR?

[appalachian_dweller]

Well, we agree on that one.

Thanks for the education on the wording of some of the constitution. Still think it applies to only US citizens though.

[Publius Valerius]

Fair enough. :-)

[Gibtx]

monica made me do it

[freeeee]

we are at war. In time of war, civil rights and even constitutional rights can be suspended

This statement presumes that war is a temporary thing as it has been in the past. And after that war is over, constitutional rights suspended for the duration of that war will be restored in full, correct?

My question to you is: What theoretical conditions must be met in order for the War on Terrorism to be declared over?

I submit that because the WoT is not a traditional style war, and by definition is a war against a method and not a tangible object such as a country(s), person(s), or army(s), it cannot be won. Even the president has stated the war will last several decades. And after a generation, restoring constitutional protections will be as unrealistic as repealing the income tax.

Because of this, WoT exceptions to the constitution are far more damaging to our rights than traditional wars. They must be considered in an entirely different way.

[freeeee]

I hope she made it worth your while.

[Gibtx]

well i never withdraw

[freeeee]

I wouldn't either with a wife like yours. And I'd drink - heavily.

[Gibtx]

kiss it .....

[freeeee]

You'll have to hire me as an intern first, Bill.

[Gibtx]

smile......

i already have two ... i dont need any more

[KC_for_Freedom]

Perhaps they were wrongly made, but we face an enemy who moves the level of hostility to a very low level indeed. Only history will tell which of us is right. For my part, I don't mind being not on the side of the ACLU.

[LadyPilgrim]

No we don't!!!

And any funding to them needs to be withdrawn, pronto!!!!

[The_Media_never_lie]

I think there was a typo in your title. I think it should read, "ACLU Comes Down on the Side of the Bill of Rights."

Does the "Bill of Rights" apply to terrorists? Do we Americans have some kind of a perverse, purist death wish that causes us to lose our common sense during time of war?

[Cold Heat]

Message to ACLU and Muslims:

We are a big family in this country, and when the people we hire to keep us safe want to investigate potential terrorist acts by simply asking you questions in the privacy of your own home or business, you need to comply.

You have rights to be silent and not say anything at all, but you better not lie, deceive or complain about the effort we are making to root out people who may harm our children.

For if you do so, you do not belong to this family and are not welcome here.

You decide!

Go back home, find some other family if you pretend to be an American, or stay and participate willingly and proudly as a American.

It is as simple as that, and beware that you will be evicted if you choose to stand in our way.

Not by our government, but by the actions of your fellow Americans, who will most certainly take matters of family very seriously.

That is my message............heed the words, for this request is made to keep all of us safe and secure. It is not a illegal request, nor is it a violation of your rights.

If you choose not to comply and one of your brethren hurts the family, you and your compatriots will be seen in the same light.

Your choice............(I hope you read this)

[The_Media_never_lie]

I'll be willing to bet there are a lot of American Muslims that want to cooperate with the FBI and want to see the violent crazies get what they deserve.