Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'9/11' to air on public-access TV
Arizona Daily Star ^ | 10/21/04 | C.J. Karamargin

Posted on 10/21/2004 6:28:43 PM PDT by TexasTaysor

A Tucson woman has succeeded where director Michael Moore failed: She is making sure the anti-Bush documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11" gets on television before the Nov. 2 election.

Radio producer Elaine Higginbotham has Moore's permission to air the controversial film on local public-access television.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailystar.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911; fahrenheit911; kerry; michaelmoore; publicaccess; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 10/21/2004 6:28:43 PM PDT by TexasTaysor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TexasTaysor

OH YEAH?? But Sinclair can't run Stolen Honor on a PRIVATELY owned TV station?

This is DISGUSTING.


We want Stolen Honor on Public TV too!!!


2 posted on 10/21/2004 6:31:14 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (These Commies are ruining our country...........WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasTaysor
Does this mean Farenhype and stolen honor could be shown the same way?
3 posted on 10/21/2004 6:31:20 PM PDT by Agitate (littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog -Jihadwatch.org -Protestwarrior.com -Congress.org -ACLJ.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Go to your local cable channel and ask to air the tape of your choice on public access.


4 posted on 10/21/2004 6:32:47 PM PDT by 1stFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

if the producers of stolen honor want it shown, why don't they stream it on the internet for starters? they could also rent a private channel on directTV and show it there.


5 posted on 10/21/2004 6:33:34 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Agitate

yes!!


6 posted on 10/21/2004 6:33:42 PM PDT by 1stFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom

Did you read the entire article? I didn't see anything in the article about advertisers pulling ads or the FCC being notified, or law suits being threatened.........

("It really is a public forum and the only restriction really is that the programs be noncommercial," Behrend said.

City Councilwoman Kathleen Dunbar called it proof of Access Tucson's "liberal agenda," and said "Stolen Honor" should be aired in the interest of balance. "If they do one they should do the other," the North Side Republican said.)


7 posted on 10/21/2004 6:35:57 PM PDT by TexasTaysor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexasTaysor

If this airs, FarenHYPE 9/11 should show afterwards to debunk this horrible film. I will gladly loan my DVD copy to whoever wants to air it.


8 posted on 10/21/2004 6:36:30 PM PDT by nascartex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

That isn't the point


9 posted on 10/21/2004 6:37:24 PM PDT by TexasTaysor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasTaysor

There was a public access in Pa. that ran Stolen Honor on 2 separate days and he is being bombarded by hate mail and threats now.


10 posted on 10/21/2004 6:38:21 PM PDT by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascartex

I totally agree......if the dims demand fairness for Sinclair, then fairness should apply here too...


11 posted on 10/21/2004 6:38:34 PM PDT by TexasTaysor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Agitate
Does this mean Farenhype and stolen honor could be shown the same way?

Yes, the "equal time" provisions of Section 315 will apply. You only have to ask. If they refuse to allow equal access prior to the election they will be subject to fines and civil litigation (mucho moolah to you).

12 posted on 10/21/2004 6:38:55 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

They do have a download for $4.99....and tons of free clips.


13 posted on 10/21/2004 6:40:00 PM PDT by Feiny (Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasTaysor

Exactly, fairness, left and right. Althought I wouldn't call Fat A** Moore's film left, its FICTION.


14 posted on 10/21/2004 6:40:18 PM PDT by nascartex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
This is ridiculous, the hate from the left is unbelievable and frankly very unhealthy for them
15 posted on 10/21/2004 6:40:30 PM PDT by TexasTaysor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TexasTaysor

I know, but since their distribution channels are being closed off - what are they trying to do to get around it? Michael Savage was playing some clips tonight, very compelling, he says they are selling the video, but what else?


16 posted on 10/21/2004 6:40:51 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: feinswinesuksass

I know that, but it isn't public TV and doesn't reach as many people. There are people who don't have computers or internet, but the majority have TV


17 posted on 10/21/2004 6:42:15 PM PDT by TexasTaysor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nascartex
The "Equal Time" Law

47 USC Section 315

(a) If any licensee shall permit any person who is a legally qualified candidate for any public office to use a broadcasting station, he shall afford equal opportunities to all other such candidates for that office in the use of such broadcasting station: Provided, That such licensee shall have no power of censorship over the material broadcast under the provisions of this section. No obligation is imposed under this subsection upon any licensee to allow the use of its station by any such candidate. Appearance by a legally qualified candidate on any--

(1) bona fide newscast,

(2) bona fide news interview,

(3) bona fide news documentary (if the appearance of the candidate is incidental to the presentation of the subject or subjects covered by the news documentary), or

(4) on-the-spot coverage of bona fide news events (including but not limited to political conventions and activities incidental thereto),

shall not be deemed to be use of a broadcasting station within the meaning of this subsection. Nothing in the foregoing sentence shall be construed as relieving broadcasters, in connection with the presentation of newscasts, news interviews, news documentaries, and on-the-spot coverage of news events, from the obligation imposed upon them under this chapter to operate in the public interest and to afford reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views on issues of public importance.

(b) The charges made for the use of any broadcasting station by any person who is a legally qualified candidate for any public office in connection with his campaign for nomination for election, or election, to such office shall not exceed--

(1) during the forty-five days preceding the date of a primary or primary runoff election and during the sixty days preceding the date of a general or special election in which such person is a candidate, the lowest unit charge of the station for the same class and amount of time for the same period; and

(2) at any other time, the charges made for comparable use of such station by other users thereof.

(c) For purposes of this section--

(1) the term "broadcasting station" includes a community antenna television system; and

(2) the terms "licensee" and "station licensee" when used with respect to a community antenna television system mean the operator of such system.

(d) Rules and regulations

The Commission shall prescribe appropriate rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this section.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Federal Candidate Access Law

47 USC Section 312

(a) the Commission may revoke any station license or construction permit--

(7) for willful or repeated failure to allow reasonable access to or to permit purchase of reasonable amounts of time for the use of a broadcasting station by a legally qualified candidate for Federal elective office on behalf of his candidacy.

18 posted on 10/21/2004 6:43:23 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (W4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TexasTaysor

Broadcast/distribution rights to F-9/11 are not Moore's to give. He has no say in the matter. Where and how the film is shown is up to the exclusive distributor, Lionsgate Productions. Lionsgate has not authorized the Az airing (in fact, knowing Democrats, I doubt they've even been consulted), nor are they likely to.


19 posted on 10/21/2004 6:46:57 PM PDT by timberlandko (Murphy was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls; 1stFreedom
I wonder how hard it would be for an ordinary peon like me to get it shown in our area. I think this is important and films like this could sway undecided voters. I have been in touch with some local activists here and am going to look into it.

We have to keep Kerry out of the whitehouse, period.

20 posted on 10/21/2004 6:47:18 PM PDT by Agitate (littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog -Jihadwatch.org -Protestwarrior.com -Congress.org -ACLJ.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson