Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Bush pre-election strike on Iran 'imminent'
www.lebanwire.com ^ | October 20, 2004 | Wayne Madsen

Posted on 10/21/2004 4:51:52 PM PDT by focusandclarity

White House insider report "October Surprise" imminent

According to White House and Washington Beltway insiders, the Bush administration, worried that it could lose the presidential election to Senator John F. Kerry, has initiated plans to launch a military strike on Iran's top Islamic leadership, its nuclear reactor at Bushehr on the Persian Gulf, and key nuclear targets throughout the country, including the main underground research site at Natanz in central Iran and another in Isfahan. Targets of the planned U.S. attack reportedly include mosques in Tehran, Qom, and Isfahan known by the U.S. to headquarter Iran's top mullahs.

The Iran attack plan was reportedly drawn up after internal polling indicated that if the Bush administration launched a so-called anti-terrorist attack on Iran some two weeks before the election, Bush would be assured of a landslide win against Kerry. Reports of a pre-emptive strike on Iran come amid concerns by a number of political observers that the Bush administration would concoct an "October Surprise" to influence the outcome of the presidential election.

According to White House sources, the USS John F. Kennedy was deployed to the Arabian Sea to coordinate the attack on Iran. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld discussed the Kennedy's role in the planned attack on Iran when he visited the ship in the Arabian Sea on October 9. Rumsfeld and defense ministers of U.S. coalition partners, including those of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Iraq, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Mongolia, Poland, Qatar, Romania, and Ukraine briefly discussed a very "top level" view of potential dual-track military operations in Iran and Iraq in a special "war room" set up on board the aircraft carrier. America's primary ally in Iraq, the United Kingdom, did not attend the planning session because it reportedly disagrees with a military strike on Iran. London also suspects the U.S. wants to move British troops from Basra in southern Iraq to the Baghdad area to help put down an expected surge in Sh'ia violence in Sadr City and other Sh'ia areas in central Iraq when the U.S. attacks Iran as well as clear the way for a U.S. military strike across the Iraqi-Iranian border aimed at securing the huge Iranian oil installations in Abadan. U.S. allies South Korea, Australia, Kuwait, Jordan, Italy, Netherlands, and Japan were also left out of the USS John F. Kennedy planning discussions because of their reported opposition to any strike on Iran.

In addition, Israel has been supplied by the United States with 500 "bunker buster" bombs. According to White House sources, the Israeli Air Force will attack Iran's nuclear facility at Bushehr with the U.S. bunker busters.The joint U.S.-Israeli pre-emptive military move against Iran reportedly was crafted by the same neo-conservative grouping in the Pentagon and Vice President Dick Cheney's office that engineered the invasion of Iraq.

Morale aboard the USS John F. Kennedy is at an all-time low, something that must be attributable to the knowledge that the ship will be involved in an extension of U.S. military actions in the Persian Gulf region. The Commanding Officer of an F-14 Tomcat squadron was relieved of command for a reported shore leave "indiscretion" in Dubai and two months ago the Kennedy's commanding officer was relieved for cause.

The White House leak about the planned attack on Iran was hastened by concerns that Russian technicians present at Bushehr could be killed in an attack, thus resulting in a wider nuclear confrontation between Washington and Moscow. International Atomic Energy Agency representatives are also present at the Bushehr facility. In addition, an immediate Iranian Shahab ballistic missile attack against Israel would also further destabilize the Middle East. The White House leaks about the pre-emptive strike may have been prompted by warnings from the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency that an attack on Iran will escalate out of control. Intelligence circles report that both intelligence agencies are in open revolt against the Bush White House.

White House sources also claimed they are "terrified" that Bush wants to start a dangerous war with Iran prior to the election and fear that such a move will trigger dire consequences for the entire world.

Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist and columnist. He served in the National Security Council (NSA) during the Reagan Administration and wrote the introduction to Forbidden Truth. He is the co-author, with john Stanton of "America's Nightmare: The Presidency of George Bush II." His forthcoming book is titled: "jaded Tasks: Big Oil, Black Ops, and Brass Plates." Madsen can be reached at Wmadsen777@aol.com

Copyright©1999-2004 Lebanonwire®.com


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: comsymppropaganda; foil; iran; islamicleadership; next; nucleartargets; octobersurprise; tin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last
Doesn't this smack of a Democrat lie/ false leak?

Especially the part (very Clintonesque-Dick Morris) that "The Iran attack plan was reportedly drawn up after internal polling indicated that if the Bush administration launched a so-called anti-terrorist attack on Iran some two weeks before the election, Bush would be assured of a landslide win against Kerry."

Please share your thoughts.

1 posted on 10/21/2004 4:51:53 PM PDT by focusandclarity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

Sounds like crap to me...


2 posted on 10/21/2004 4:52:49 PM PDT by The Hollywood Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

LOL.

There are just not words to descrice how funny this one is......


3 posted on 10/21/2004 4:53:20 PM PDT by TitansAFC (Try to avoid the Yahoo! John F. Kerry for president campaign (read: "Yahoo! Election News"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity
According to White House and Washington Beltway insiders, the Bush administration, worried that it could lose the presidential election to Senator John F. Kerry,

Bush doesn't seem worried to me.

An attack on Iran would seem gratutious and would cost Bush the election.

4 posted on 10/21/2004 4:53:34 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

The attack comes after the election if Bush loses. Israel will do it.


5 posted on 10/21/2004 4:53:51 PM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

I'm expecting any strike to happen after the election.


6 posted on 10/21/2004 4:53:56 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

Good thing we didn't step in it!


7 posted on 10/21/2004 4:54:03 PM PDT by pipecorp ("never know where you're going till you get there." the philosopher Insectus Harem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

Personally, I hope it's a "November Surprise," like on the 3rd.


8 posted on 10/21/2004 4:54:11 PM PDT by My2Cents (http://www.conservativesforbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

--yep--Demotraitor garbage---


9 posted on 10/21/2004 4:54:12 PM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Agreed. This is total crap...


10 posted on 10/21/2004 4:54:18 PM PDT by JesseJane (~On November 2, keep in mind what mattered most on 9-11.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Hollywood Conservative
So much of it, in fact, their eyes are brown !

Nam Vet

11 posted on 10/21/2004 4:54:33 PM PDT by Nam Vet (MSM reporters think the MOIST dream they had the night before is a "reliable source".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Hollywood Conservative

This is the biggest lie I've ever read.


12 posted on 10/21/2004 4:54:34 PM PDT by hawaiian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

Bravo Sierra


13 posted on 10/21/2004 4:54:47 PM PDT by afnamvet (Tuy Hoa AB RVN 68-69 Jet Noise...The Sound of Freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

Propaganda Minister looking for work in the Kerry camp.


14 posted on 10/21/2004 4:54:49 PM PDT by Prost1 (To Trust Kerry is to Hate America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

You've got to be kidding me!!! How stupid do they think we are? This is bunk...no question. They are really getting desperate.


15 posted on 10/21/2004 4:55:19 PM PDT by sitewriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

Excellent satire. The author of this has a brilliant, dry wit. Look out Scrappleface.


16 posted on 10/21/2004 4:55:19 PM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

Ha! He left out Halliburton!


17 posted on 10/21/2004 4:55:48 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

I don't believe this for one moment!


18 posted on 10/21/2004 4:56:15 PM PDT by CarolinaGOP (North Carolina 2004 - Vote Bush, Burr, Ballantine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: focusandclarity

"According to White House sources,"


That must be a very common name in DC. It turns up in all the coolest conspiracy theories.


19 posted on 10/21/2004 4:56:37 PM PDT by cripplecreek (We've turned the corner and we're not smokin crack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hawaiian
This is the biggest lie I've ever read.

Never read Genesis 3:4?

Dan
Biblical Christianity web site

20 posted on 10/21/2004 4:56:42 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson