Posted on 10/19/2004 10:51:37 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln
bttt
Lando
Aamazing...and sad...Thanks for posting this.
The former is a matter of historical fact. The latter, though...I don't doubt it, but I'd like a quote. If Kerry has "spoken glowingly" of Castro, it will hurt him in FL. Most Cuban-Americans are already way pro-Bush, but a Kerry quote praising Castro could peel off even more.
Excellent article.
When I got to this line, I looked at the top of the page to see where this posting came from. Maybe it's the over-the-counter cold medicine I'm on, but I laughed out loud when saw it was from "Pipeline News". :-D
The candidacy of Kerry is proof of the power of the Clintons and their aparat. Kerry was selected to lose! Kerry is the very weakest candidate that could have been selected. The dems in Congress are in dissaray and no White House victory for Kerry would change that. This is a throw away election and Kerry is a throw away candidate.
In fact, a dem party enema is just what the Clintons want. The want to purge any capable leadership or challenger over the next four years. They can afford a few battles if they still have a shot at winning the war.
Kerry is a lazy elitist with an arrogant manner and a very poor work ethic (and a billionaire wife). When he loses, he is not going to "lead" the opposition, he his going back to 3 day weeks and no committee assignments.
Look at evry other dem candidate (including Kucinich). They all have led crusades and have dynamic constituencies. They would have had a record to run on, core backers to support hem and issues to push 'til the next election. Kerry is/was and always has been a nothing kind of lazy guy.
When Kerry loses, the purges will take place, the recriminations made, dem hands will be wrung and, then, Hillie will come riding over the hill to save us all with her sword carried by Willie who will be riding a donkey. They will rebuild, save and work to regain a loyal Congress. It is 2008 that these crapweasels are working on! Kerry is just a sacrificial lamb!
From the article:
Kerry is a truly evil man; a mendacious plutocrat existing on stolen money and stolen honor, personally insulated from the effect of his socialist policies because of clever tax planning.
Most who intimately know Kerry find him detestable. The officers who commanded him during his short bivouac in Vietnam hate his guts.
He and his foul-mouthed wife are cheap grifters - trailer park scavengers, living off the fortune of a dead man.
Kerry has been on the wrong side of history for 35 years, siding at every opportunity with whatever two bit dictator or enemy the United States has come up against.
Kerry believes that communism was never a threat, that 20,000 Soviet nuclear warheads meant us no harm. He is a friend of people like Danny Ortega and has spoken glowingly of Fidel Castro. He would not even vote to stand up to Saddam Hussein [even after George Herbert Walker Bush had assembled a huge coalition and gotten UN approval"] as he tried to take control of the worlds oil supply, starting with the invasion of Kuwait.
My thanks to BulletBobCo for the concept of this
pic and to Conspiracy Guy for the captions!
Thanks for the ping!
Thanks for the ping!
I dunno. Would you prefer Wesley Clark? Dennis Kucinich? There wasn't a decent candidate in the whole bunch.
"I dunno. Would you prefer Wesley Clark? Dennis Kucinich? There wasn't a decent candidate in the whole bunch."
I didn't say they were strong or attractive but they were better than Viet Cong Kerry. Ask Dennis or Clark "What have you done over the past 20 years why are you proud of it?" and they'd both gift you a list of items that would impress some folks AND they would speak with passion, focus and purpose. Kerry can't, he hasn't done a damn thing! Kerry has led nothing. There is no cadre that can say, "Yes, we followed him in the crusade for ...."
In fact, Clark would have made a far, far better candidate. He can say all the blather that Kerry is being fed AND he can claim years of military and diplomatic achievement. He is a general and Americans like generals. Clark wouldn't have to base his claim for "leadership" qualities on something that probably didn't happen anyway, 30 years ago. No, Clark would have been a much better candidate but then he'd be in a position to block Hillie in 2008. Now, Clark may well be Hillie's running mate in 2008.
Gephardt would have been better, too. He's run in a state that is a tossup state, and won. He has real history as a legislator. He's a more moderate candidate. He's from flyover country not the most socialist city in the most socialist state in America. He might have started a discussion about out sourcing and down sizing with some believability, where as the billionaire giggolo could not.
Yes.
I loathe and hate what the Democrat Party has become.
John Kerry is the most frightening, unbalanced man to run for president in my lifetime, and that is saying alot, considering that it includes both Carter and Clinton, who, while having policies that I abhored, do not seem at their core to be hollow men, with no center.
BTTT
And it doesn't stop there.
To them, it is also good news that the price of oil is going up and up and up.
The kids over at DU were actually celebrating the fact that oil prices were increasing yesterday.
But what do you REALLY think, Mr. Mayer?
Great read! I wish every voter in America could read this. It would peel off alot of Kerry voters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.