Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Bad Seed (Very Powerful - Recommended Reading)
Pipeline News ^ | 19 October 2004 | William A. Mayer

Posted on 10/19/2004 10:51:37 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln

It is fortuitous that John Kerry is both the standard bearer for as well as the embodiment of the Democrat Party, because that means we have a chance to cleanse the nation of both at the polls on November 2nd.

View Tuesday’s election as a much needed enema, to be inserted directly into the cesspools of liberalism, starting with Massachusetts.

The leadership of the DNC and Kerry are enemies of this republic. They are hate-filled, sociopathic traitors bent on seeing Islamist terror brought home to your neighborhood.

John Kerry has blood on his hands, some of it long dried, some quite fresh.

The next time you see, in grainy video, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi savagely saw-off the head of yet another hapless American civilian, cast John F. Kerry as the true perpetrator. He is the best enabler of terror that the Democrats can offer. Al-Qaeda terrorists have upped the horror quotient precisely to aid his electoral chances as they did earlier this year in Spain.

The entire strategy of the Kerry campaign is keyed to increasing body counts in Iraq and Afghanistan – to them news of dead American fighting men and women is a good thing and of course the networks and major print media outlets are in total agreement.

No one can be sure just how many lives have been needlessly lost, but it is an undeniable fact that had Kerry campaigned on a bi-partisan foreign policy [the norm through 1964] based upon aggressively confronting terror in all its forms, fewer Coalition troops and Iraqis would have been killed.

That not being the case however, consider this election a propitiation offered to the families of those murdered directly by John Kerry’s shameless pandering to America’s enemies.

Kerry’s current misdeeds differ not at all from his actions in 1971 - slandering American servicemen, aiding and abetting the North Vietnamese enemy, freely giving - through his own fraudulent testimony - what POWs, under torture refused to say.

Kerry is a truly evil man; a mendacious plutocrat existing on stolen money and stolen honor, personally insulated from the effect of his socialist policies because of clever tax planning.

Most who intimately know Kerry find him detestable. The officers who commanded him during his short bivouac in Vietnam hate his guts.

He and his foul-mouthed wife are cheap grifters - trailer park scavengers, living off the fortune of a dead man.

Kerry has been on the wrong side of history for 35 years, siding at every opportunity with whatever two bit dictator or enemy the United States has come up against.

Kerry believes that communism was never a threat, that 20,000 Soviet nuclear warheads meant us no harm. He is a friend of people like Danny Ortega and has spoken glowingly of Fidel Castro. He would not even vote to stand up to Saddam Hussein [even after George Herbert Walker Bush had assembled a huge coalition and gotten UN “approval"] as he tried to take control of the worlds oil supply, starting with the invasion of Kuwait.

He has acted at every turn to disarm the United States seeking to make it defenseless against its enemies and has consistently attempted to gut U.S. intelligence and law enforcement.

His campaign has depended in large part on blood money courtesy of George Soros, the Stalinists at A.N.S.W.E.R. and lefty California computer flashes-in-the-pan MoveOn.org. He has perfected and now personifies the politics of hate and personal destruction devised by the Clintons.

The reality of this causes President Bush to carry a monumental load, doing far more than just running against an opponent; he is running against a twisted vision of society brought forth by Kerry, Bill and Hillary and their subterranean army of Brown-Shirted private investigators, blackmailers, document forgers and the lying whores in the media – call them the dirty dozen: CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Boston Globe, the Los Angeles Times, Knight Ridder, the San Francisco Chronicle and the Atlanta Constitution.

Now that victory is certain for Bush, the Democrats are preparing to steal the election; thousand of lawyers are already geared up to challenge the results in every congressional district that doesn’t go for Kerry.

The courts – packed by Clinton/Gore with quota-based Mau-Maus who have plantation mentalities - will once again be used in an attempt to bring about a coup de etat, as they almost were allowed to do in Florida in 2000.

That effort must be ripped apart, smashed.

Fortunately, we are sometimes given an opportunity to glimpse the inner character of a candidate as was the case with John Kerry’s homophobic manhandling of Mary Cheney during the third presidential debate.

That performance demonstrated a brutal bully, who like Hamas does a nifty job of battering women and children, but is a coward when it's time for the nut cutting.

We can't say it any more plainly, John Forbes Kerry is an admitted war criminal, a party to the planning of political assassinations and a friend of our enemies. He is a calculating, despicable, socialist asshole with utterly no redeeming qualities.

He is unfit for any political office, let alone the presidency, and must be soundly defeated.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: kerry; mayer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Lando
1 posted on 10/19/2004 10:51:37 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

bttt


2 posted on 10/19/2004 10:55:58 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (John Kerry betrayed this country as a young man and he will betray this country as president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lainde; FairOpinion; gatorbait; Tolik; MeekOneGOP; kabar; mgist; BlueLancer; gljones; ...
Recommended reading ping!!..... Ping lists up!

Lando

3 posted on 10/19/2004 10:56:20 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln (A Fair and Balanced Decision - GWB in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Aamazing...and sad...Thanks for posting this.


4 posted on 10/19/2004 10:59:07 AM PDT by YepYep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
He is a friend of people like Danny Ortega and has spoken glowingly of Fidel Castro.

The former is a matter of historical fact. The latter, though...I don't doubt it, but I'd like a quote. If Kerry has "spoken glowingly" of Castro, it will hurt him in FL. Most Cuban-Americans are already way pro-Bush, but a Kerry quote praising Castro could peel off even more.

5 posted on 10/19/2004 11:02:38 AM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood (Behind every terrorist, there's a tyrant with a checkbook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Excellent article.


6 posted on 10/19/2004 11:08:50 AM PDT by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion has already been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"View Tuesday’s election as a much needed enema, to be inserted directly into the cesspools of liberalism, starting with Massachusetts."

When I got to this line, I looked at the top of the page to see where this posting came from. Maybe it's the over-the-counter cold medicine I'm on, but I laughed out loud when saw it was from "Pipeline News". :-D

7 posted on 10/19/2004 11:16:41 AM PDT by P H Lewis (One of the fundamentals of democracy is knowing where to place your machine gun. - Foggy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Well yes, but...

The candidacy of Kerry is proof of the power of the Clintons and their aparat. Kerry was selected to lose! Kerry is the very weakest candidate that could have been selected. The dems in Congress are in dissaray and no White House victory for Kerry would change that. This is a throw away election and Kerry is a throw away candidate.

In fact, a dem party enema is just what the Clintons want. The want to purge any capable leadership or challenger over the next four years. They can afford a few battles if they still have a shot at winning the war.

Kerry is a lazy elitist with an arrogant manner and a very poor work ethic (and a billionaire wife). When he loses, he is not going to "lead" the opposition, he his going back to 3 day weeks and no committee assignments.

Look at evry other dem candidate (including Kucinich). They all have led crusades and have dynamic constituencies. They would have had a record to run on, core backers to support hem and issues to push 'til the next election. Kerry is/was and always has been a nothing kind of lazy guy.

When Kerry loses, the purges will take place, the recriminations made, dem hands will be wrung and, then, Hillie will come riding over the hill to save us all with her sword carried by Willie who will be riding a donkey. They will rebuild, save and work to regain a loyal Congress. It is 2008 that these crapweasels are working on! Kerry is just a sacrificial lamb!

8 posted on 10/19/2004 11:26:22 AM PDT by Tacis (John Kerry - Treason Then; Treason Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln; Happy2BMe; PhilDragoo; devolve


From the article:

Kerry is a truly evil man; a mendacious plutocrat existing on stolen money and stolen honor, personally insulated from the effect of his socialist policies because of clever tax planning.

Most who intimately know Kerry find him detestable. The officers who commanded him during his short bivouac in Vietnam hate his guts.

He and his foul-mouthed wife are cheap grifters - trailer park scavengers, living off the fortune of a dead man.

Kerry has been on the wrong side of history for 35 years, siding at every opportunity with whatever two bit dictator or enemy the United States has come up against.

Kerry believes that communism was never a threat, that 20,000 Soviet nuclear warheads meant us no harm. He is a friend of people like Danny Ortega and has spoken glowingly of Fidel Castro. He would not even vote to stand up to Saddam Hussein [even after George Herbert Walker Bush had assembled a huge coalition and gotten UN “approval"] as he tried to take control of the worlds oil supply, starting with the invasion of Kuwait.


My thanks to BulletBobCo for the concept of this
pic and to Conspiracy Guy for the captions!


9 posted on 10/19/2004 11:34:23 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Thanks for the ping!


10 posted on 10/19/2004 11:44:02 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Thanks for the ping!


11 posted on 10/19/2004 11:44:02 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
It's pretty clear where the hi-jacked Dem party is going...



and they're goin' there "in a hand-basket"

(as my dear ol' dad use to say)

12 posted on 10/19/2004 11:47:29 AM PDT by Zacs Mom ("The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons" ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
Kerry is the very weakest candidate that could have been selected.

I dunno. Would you prefer Wesley Clark? Dennis Kucinich? There wasn't a decent candidate in the whole bunch.

13 posted on 10/19/2004 12:11:51 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
"Kerry is the very weakest candidate that could have been selected."

"I dunno. Would you prefer Wesley Clark? Dennis Kucinich? There wasn't a decent candidate in the whole bunch."

I didn't say they were strong or attractive but they were better than Viet Cong Kerry. Ask Dennis or Clark "What have you done over the past 20 years why are you proud of it?" and they'd both gift you a list of items that would impress some folks AND they would speak with passion, focus and purpose. Kerry can't, he hasn't done a damn thing! Kerry has led nothing. There is no cadre that can say, "Yes, we followed him in the crusade for ...."

In fact, Clark would have made a far, far better candidate. He can say all the blather that Kerry is being fed AND he can claim years of military and diplomatic achievement. He is a general and Americans like generals. Clark wouldn't have to base his claim for "leadership" qualities on something that probably didn't happen anyway, 30 years ago. No, Clark would have been a much better candidate but then he'd be in a position to block Hillie in 2008. Now, Clark may well be Hillie's running mate in 2008.

14 posted on 10/19/2004 12:30:08 PM PDT by Tacis (John Kerry - Treason Then; Treason Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tacis

Gephardt would have been better, too. He's run in a state that is a tossup state, and won. He has real history as a legislator. He's a more moderate candidate. He's from flyover country not the most socialist city in the most socialist state in America. He might have started a discussion about out sourcing and down sizing with some believability, where as the billionaire giggolo could not.


15 posted on 10/19/2004 12:51:23 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
it is an undeniable fact that had Kerry campaigned on a bi-partisan foreign policy [the norm through 1964] based upon aggressively confronting terror in all its forms, fewer Coalition troops and Iraqis would have been killed.

Yes.

I loathe and hate what the Democrat Party has become.

John Kerry is the most frightening, unbalanced man to run for president in my lifetime, and that is saying alot, considering that it includes both Carter and Clinton, who, while having policies that I abhored, do not seem at their core to be hollow men, with no center.

16 posted on 10/19/2004 12:54:42 PM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

BTTT


17 posted on 10/19/2004 12:56:53 PM PDT by spodefly (I've posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
"The entire strategy of the Kerry campaign is keyed to increasing body counts in Iraq and Afghanistan – to them news of dead American fighting men and women is a good thing and of course the networks and major print media outlets are in total agreement."

And it doesn't stop there.

To them, it is also good news that the price of oil is going up and up and up.

The kids over at DU were actually celebrating the fact that oil prices were increasing yesterday.

18 posted on 10/19/2004 1:11:42 PM PDT by chs68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

But what do you REALLY think, Mr. Mayer?


19 posted on 10/19/2004 4:11:45 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Great read! I wish every voter in America could read this. It would peel off alot of Kerry voters.


20 posted on 10/19/2004 4:18:31 PM PDT by beckysueb (W for Prez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson