Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parents Sue Police After Son's Alleged Cocaine Death
wdiv ^

Posted on 10/19/2004 7:29:25 AM PDT by esryle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: esryle

Somebody beat Fieger to the case...


41 posted on 10/19/2004 7:54:01 AM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

If it was Mom's the she should have swallowed it, cause the driver is usually the one that gets taken in, then she could have croaked and the son would either eventually follow her footsteps or clean up. either way we'd be less two scumbags.

Must have been a lot of cocaine.

I agree no sympathy for people like this.


42 posted on 10/19/2004 7:54:03 AM PDT by raivyn (4 MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
"What is a 16 year old kid doing with cocaine in the first place? Driving a new car that, no doubt, he bought from money he saved delivering news papers and cutting lawns?"


---So he deserves to die because of that? Lets get real here people. If the police saw him swallow the drug they have an obligation to seek medical attention for him. Now, I'm no advocate of lawsuits or teens getting away with crimes but the law officials in this case failed their duty by not making sure the kid was protected from harm.
43 posted on 10/19/2004 7:54:18 AM PDT by MichelleWSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

I'm a little angry today :)

My point stands, if they police, by their own admission, saw him swallow cocaine . . .

To me, that statement OBVIOUSLY has a lot of assumptions in it. I mean, really. THis is FR, we have 1,000,000 post threads based upon a sentence taken out of context on a daily basis.

There are many sides to this story, I started with the assumption (not saying its likely) that if one side were telling the truth, this would be my thoughts on the matter.

Thats it!


44 posted on 10/19/2004 7:54:49 AM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: esryle

Proof of natural selection at work. We need more chlorine in the gene pool.


45 posted on 10/19/2004 7:55:31 AM PDT by killjoy (Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Thanks, now I have no sympathy (other than what's respectful).


46 posted on 10/19/2004 7:56:00 AM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: raivyn

Look, let's use some simple observation here. The cops were obviously pulling the kid over, because he was driving a car that looked like it didn't belong to him.
the kid had drugs on him, and he tosed them in his mouth before the cops probably even got out of their car.

At best, they observed him swallowing "something".
The cops may have asked, what did you swallow? The kid probably said something like, "none of your cracker ass business". Since it's swallowed, there is nothing the cops can do. They don't know what he swallowed, maybe some crack, some pot, a few ludes.
They aren't responsible.


47 posted on 10/19/2004 7:56:46 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: esryle

I'm shocked Fieger isn't on the case.


48 posted on 10/19/2004 7:56:49 AM PDT by jbarkley (America's light doesn't flicker, Senator Edwards, some people just close their eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esryle


The cops didnt force him to swallow it. It was his choice, just like getting involved with the drug in the first place. Sounds like the kid made alot of bad choices, and now the cops are at fault for it. Seems like mama should have seen the kid was going down the wrong path before it got this far.


49 posted on 10/19/2004 7:57:23 AM PDT by texas_mrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams

they didn'nt read him his Cocaine rights first. He didn't know NOT swallowing them was a legal option...


50 posted on 10/19/2004 7:57:50 AM PDT by Rakkasan1 (Justice of the Piece:Charity is conservative;doing it with someone else's money is liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC
If the police saw him swallow the drug they have an obligation to seek medical attention for him.

He denied it. You'd think the kid would know if he swallowed cocaine.

51 posted on 10/19/2004 7:58:30 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
he should have been taken immediately to a hospital for an encounter with a stomache pump or ipecac.

And would he have willingly submitted to an invasive procedure, knowing that if it recovered cocaine, he would be charged with possession of it.?

And if he did willingly submit, would he later sue the hospital and the police for coercion and duress, under which he "reluctantly" submitted to an invasive procedure?

And, let's assume a set of different circumstances, wherein there was no cocaine.

Are the police to treated as an innocent party for acting as "Good Samaritans", for assuming that the youth had swallowed something that might be injurious to his health?

My head is swinning. Someone should refer this to our wanna-be VP candidate, the erstwhile and earnest, John Edwards, Esquire.

Perhaps he can channel the dead youth and find out exactly what happened.

Only a trial lawyer can help us now.

Oh, wait, he's not finished combing his hair.

Get someone else.

52 posted on 10/19/2004 7:58:52 AM PDT by OldSmaj (Islam is a false religion. It's adherents and followers are doomed to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...

Additional followup from this morning's WDIV story:




The City of Dearborn issued a response in reaction to a $50 million wrongful death lawsuit filed by a local family.

The parents of Quantrell Pryor, 16, claim their son's death could have been prevented if Dearborn police would have immediately taken him to the hospital, Local 4 reported.

"The doctor said if he would have gotten here in 30 minutes or earlier, or even an hour earlier it would have made such a difference," said LaTanya Pryor, the teen's mother.

Dearborn police stopped Pryor (pictured, left) last Tuesday outside the JC Penney department store at Fairlane Mall when they noticed the left rear window was broken out in the vehicle he was driving.

Pryor panicked and swallowed cocaine he had in his possession, according to the station's reports.

Pryor was taken by squad car to the Dearborn police station at about 5 p.m. Police said he repeatedly denied that he had ingested any drugs when questioned by officers.

Pryor was transferred by ambulance to Oakwood Hospital from police custody after going into convulsions inside an observation cell at about 6:20 p.m., police said.

Attorney Arnold Reed, who is representing Pryor's family in the lawsuit, said police knew the teen had ingested cocaine, but did nothing to save him until it was too late.

A neighbor of the teen's family reportedly claimed to have seen Pryor convulsing in the back seat of the squad car.

"And the police told her that he had just ingested drugs. She then got her cell phone and immediately called the mother," said Reed.

The family claims that Pryor was taken into custody around 5 p.m. and did not make it to the hospital until about 7:30 p.m.

Pryor was pronounced dead on arrival, but doctors managed to maintain his heartbeat, Local 4 reported. He was removed from life support on Saturday.

"I wouldn't want a dollar if I could get my son back," LaTanya Prior said.

It was initially reported that the vehicle Pryor was driving was not stolen, but Dearborn police have confirmed that the vehicle was stolen from Tennessee. Police also confirmed that the substance in his possession was cocaine, according to reports.

Police said Pryor was belligerent and uncooperative from the time of his arrest.

Pryor has a history of drug arrests, according to police.

The investigation into his death continues.


53 posted on 10/19/2004 7:59:40 AM PDT by mhking (Does John Kerry always speak with exclamation points?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruiner

I misread, sorry.

Still no sympathy, as a user/pusher/whatever, he knew the possible consequences of his action. I'm tired of these kinds of bullsh*t law suits.

I break into your house with malicious intent, your dog attacks me, and I sue you. My lawsuit seeks to distract from the big picture here: What the hell was I doing breaking into your house in the first place. The dog attack was a reaction to my action. What's that obscure saying... Every action has and equal and opposite reaction?


54 posted on 10/19/2004 8:00:13 AM PDT by raivyn (4 MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

lol, exactly!


55 posted on 10/19/2004 8:01:49 AM PDT by raivyn (4 MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Yes, and I'm sure it will all go to a good cause...

Say, the local hood on the corner...


56 posted on 10/19/2004 8:03:20 AM PDT by raivyn (4 MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC

yes, he does. it' not the duty of the police to take him to the hospical and pump his stomach on suspicion, which would get them sued as well. He denied swallowing drugs.
End of story.
And good riddance. or do you think he should have lived another day, and maybe sold some bad drugs to someone else, a group of kids, and they all die from it?


57 posted on 10/19/2004 8:03:34 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

'The kid just saved taxpayers 65+ years of costs.'

Not if the $50 MIL lawsuit happens!


58 posted on 10/19/2004 8:03:35 AM PDT by jaydubya2 (Long time Listener, First time caller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: esryle

Why did he swallow the cocaine?

Because it is illegal to own.

Why are some drugs against the law to own?

To provide LEO / Government workers with a means to collect a paycheck.

So what if the kid died, the taxpayers will foot the bill, and LEO / Government workers will continue to rock on with the WOD.

The life of a stupid kid, breaking the law, is a small price to pay to continue the gravy train for LEO / Government workers.

Heck the loss of a few LEO / Government workers is no big deal, but a small price to pay to continue the war on drugs.

After all, the LEO / Government workers have families to feed and government pensions to collect.

And NO, I do not use recreational drugs nor do I care to, I know they are bad for my health, and I am able to make my own decisions.


59 posted on 10/19/2004 8:04:13 AM PDT by Mark was here (My tag line was about to be censored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC

I hear welfare is a lucrative business these days.


60 posted on 10/19/2004 8:04:18 AM PDT by raivyn (4 MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson