1 posted on
10/19/2004 12:07:13 AM PDT by
kattracks
To: kattracks
well that is a bit of a hyperventilated headline.
There was no contract, there is nothing to sue over.
2 posted on
10/19/2004 12:08:28 AM PDT by
GeronL
(John Kerry believes in a right to privacy and in gay rights............ ask "fair game" Mary Cheney)
To: kattracks
Regan was the best president the world has ever seen.
But WTF happened with his kids? Did Nancy drop them?!
3 posted on
10/19/2004 12:09:41 AM PDT by
TheTwelvePack
(WTF is Allen Keys doing?)
To: kattracks
Sad to say both of Reagan's children from Nancy are complete idiots. It's always about them. Their father would be so embarrassed.
4 posted on
10/19/2004 12:11:02 AM PDT by
Casloy
To: kattracks
The suit seeks half the speaking fee — $7,500 — plus $22,500 in punitive damages. Punitive damages against the Salvation Army. This woman is the Grinch.
To: kattracks
Patti and Ron work as hard as they can to trash any hint of dignity they can connected to their fathers name...
they are a disgrace to the human race, and a waste of being able to breathe fresh air....
she looks like a hag, and he looks like a hags sister...
12 posted on
10/19/2004 12:46:13 AM PDT by
ArmyBratCutie
("Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:soap, ballot, jury, ammo in this order!")
To: kattracks
She's a Puke, and unworthy of that noble man's name.
13 posted on
10/19/2004 12:46:27 AM PDT by
broadsword
(Weren't there a couple of giant Buddhist statues in Afghanistan? What happened to them?)
To: kattracks
The Salvation Army is one of my favorite charities. They are front-line help for the disadvantaged. Food, shelter, utility bill payments, etc for emergencies.
Gotta wonder who got to the Reagan kids. Suing charities is a new kind of low.
20 posted on
10/19/2004 3:32:59 AM PDT by
GVnana
(If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
To: kattracks
I am relieved that president Reagan does not have to endure this.
What creeps these two are.
To: kattracks
Patti DAVIS (so glad she didn't want to take her father's good name) can bitch all she wants about the Salvation Army. All her bitching will do is fill their coffers even more! I can't wait to make a donation to them in HER name!
28 posted on
11/10/2004 5:48:31 PM PST by
demkicker
(I'm Ra th er sick of Dan)
To: kattracks
The real question is why the Salvation Army thought paying $15,000 to hear Patti Davis speak was a good idea to begin with.
That pays for a lot of other needs if'n you ask me.
31 posted on
11/10/2004 5:54:34 PM PST by
Tall_Texan
(Let's REALLY Split The Country! (http://righteverytime3.blogspot.com))
To: kattracks
Is she trying to be as obnoxious as her ballerina brother?
Thanksfully, she goes by the surname Davis.
36 posted on
11/10/2004 6:00:46 PM PST by
onyx
To: kattracks
Someone who would sue a charitable organisation because they cancelled a speaking engagement is contemptible.
Someone who would charge a charity for a speaking engagement in the first place is worse.
40 posted on
11/10/2004 6:13:22 PM PST by
Happygal
(liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
To: kattracks
Sueing the Sally Army? "A wanton, willful and malicious act."?? She's got to be joking.
That ranks on the same level as taking away a baby's toy or sticking out your foot to trip up an elderly person.
Mind you, the SA must also be losing their marbles to have even considered giving this clueless broad $15,000 to open her pie hole. What a waste of money.
Patti must really be desperate for her to set the attack lawyers on the SA.
To: kattracks
Patti Davis is like a Liza Minelli with even less talent.
To: kattracks
The only army a lefty would wage war upon: one without any guns.
To: kattracks
Some conservative lady should take up this cause and show their good nature, like Laura Ingraham or Ann Coulter.....but I doubt if the Salvation Army could afford their speaking fees.
51 posted on
11/11/2004 6:01:45 AM PST by
gortklattu
(check out thotline dot com)
To: kattracks
Attention Patty: He added his clients didn't breach their contract with Davis because they never signed one.
A big Nelson "HA HA" to ya, babe!
52 posted on
11/11/2004 6:07:10 AM PST by
aruanan
To: kattracks
He added his clients didn't breach their contract with Davis because they never signed one. That's pretty much a slam-dunk defense.
58 posted on
11/11/2004 6:20:15 AM PST by
Dog Gone
To: kattracks
The SA saved our butts during relief efforts after Hurricane Donna in 1961 leveled Marathon, Fl. Blankets and free clothing, with cash for food and a place to stay. I will cotinue to support them.
65 posted on
12/05/2004 7:38:06 AM PST by
sandydipper
(Less government is best government!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson