Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US, Iraq Opposed Saudi Plan for All-Muslim Force -US
Reuters ^ | 10/18/04 | Irwin Arieff

Posted on 10/18/2004 6:19:40 PM PDT by TexKat

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The Iraqi government and U.S. military commanders both rejected a Saudi plan for an all-Muslim force to protect U.N. election staff in Iraq, the White House said on Monday.

"The Iraqi interim government had some real concerns about having troops from a neighboring country inside Iraq. The multinational commanders also had some concerns about forces operating outside the chain of command structure," said White House spokesman Scott McClellan, commenting on a media report.

New York daily Newsday reported on Monday that President Bush rebuffed the Saudi initiative because the force would not have been under U.S. command.

Such a move would raise questions about the Bush administration's repeated assertions that it was eager to have other countries send troops to Iraq to ease the burden on American forces, it said.

Saudi Arabia announced it hoped to organize such a force in July during a visit by Secretary of State Colin Powell.

But several Muslim countries, including Indonesia, Egypt and Pakistan were cool to the idea, citing the increasing violence in Iraq as well as concerns about possibly having to serve under U.S. command.

The United Nations was also uncertain whether it wanted its staff protected by a force of one religious group rather than its usual multilateral approach, U.N. sources said.

But Newsday said Crown Prince Abdullah personally lobbied Bush to agree to deploy a unit of several hundred troops from Muslim nations to help prepare for January elections.

Washington, the newspaper said, turned down the proposal because the plan would have meant troops being under U.N. control rather than the control of U.S. commanders who lead the multinational force now intended to ensure security in Iraq.

The question of control "was a serious issue for the commanders of the multinational force," Newsday quoted an unnamed White House spokesman as saying.

A senior U.S. administration official in Washington blamed the Iraqi government for the plan's failure, saying it did not want troops from neighboring countries deployed inside Iraq.

In addition, the plan contained no real commitment by other Arab nations to contribute troops to the force, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

But Iraqi officials said they had already worked out a deal with the Saudis ruling out the involvement of any Iraqi neighbor, Newsday said.

The Saudi crown prince discussed the plan with Bush by telephone on July 28, the newspaper said.

In Riyadh, a Saudi government official said he was unaware the plan had been blocked. His government's role had been confined to making the proposal in July, the official said.

The United Nations is under heavy pressure from the United States, Iraq and other countries to send senior staff for the Iraq elections, due by Jan. 30. All international staff were pulled out last year after two bomb attacks on U.N. Baghdad headquarters in Baghdad.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allmuslimforce; iraqelection; unelectionstaff

1 posted on 10/18/2004 6:19:40 PM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TexKat

Good move by Bush, his military commanders and the Iraqis to nix this.


2 posted on 10/18/2004 6:24:32 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
The guys with the clap want to run the clinic.
3 posted on 10/18/2004 6:32:23 PM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive
The guys with the clap want to run the clinic.

No kidding. Why not have soldiers from democracies safeguard the election?

4 posted on 10/18/2004 6:39:37 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

I saw Allawi on several occasions say he was adamantly opposed to neighboring nations coming across the Iraq border. I think he knows there are enough problems from wars with Iraq's neighbors and didn't want to start another.


5 posted on 10/18/2004 6:42:28 PM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

LMAO


6 posted on 10/18/2004 7:24:20 PM PDT by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

In the vaguest terms, it sounds appealing. When you get down to what was really offered, it would be a setback.


7 posted on 10/18/2004 7:27:43 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

The Saudis need to take a heaping spoonful of STFU.


8 posted on 10/18/2004 7:38:17 PM PDT by valkyrieanne (card-carrying South Park Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

"The guys with the clap want to run the clinic."
Extremely well said.


9 posted on 10/18/2004 9:33:34 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

Uh...and whose side would they be on?


10 posted on 10/18/2004 9:39:19 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson