If she has tapes then he is done
If not then out of court settlement is more likely which is most likely what she wants in first place
Hardly. All she had to do to mitigate her "damages" is hang up.
Tapes or other "evidence" are irrelevant. The company had a system in place for dealing with "sexual harrassment", and she chose to not only bypass safety protocols, but to encourage the "perpetration" of said "crimes".
The only area where I believe he will be hurt is with his phoney baloney populist books.
It would be impossible to "phone rape" somebody. If she found these calls so disgusting, she could have hung up. If they happened at all, the fact that she didn't hang up made it consensual.
Women like this destroy all chances for those with legitimate harassment gripes getting their issues resolved in a dignified way.
Even if this stuff is true (so what?...more dumb guy humor) all she had to do is ask for a recommendation to be transferred to another program.
She had one of the best, most exciting jobs one could imagine. She'd destroy everything around her because maybe someone said "vibrator"? I hope nobody hires her again.
If she illegally taped him wo/ his permission, she's got a felony charge to answer to, and the tapes are inadmissable evidence.
What tapes? How can one be FORCED into phone sex? Be serious, you hang up the phone....
Sorry this whole story at least at the detail level doesn't pass the smell test.
She QUIT FOX to go to CNN, and then begged to come back to FOX?? The majority of her dates of claim of abuse were before she left for CNN the first time... her co workers even at CNN say she idolized O'Reilly.
At this point, at least as to what has come out in the press, this has all the markings of a lover or one who desires to be a lover, scorned and lashing out in revenge.
I think after sex in the city, we should expect more these kinds of cases.
There should be no outrage when our interactions have been cheapened to this extent.
If she has tapes then he is done
If not then out of court settlement is more likely which is most likely what she wants in first place""
Don't most states have statutes in place that a worker who claims Sax Harrassment from her workplace CANNOT be fired while everything is be handled by the judicial system?
Wouldn't that paint her as guilty of something even before the situation was sorted out? If she can be fired, it sure places a woman in a bad place, trying to stop the harrassment and not lose her job all at the same time. No wonder these creeps are called predators.