Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I want my life back! (O'Reilly Accuser)
New York Daily News ^ | 10/18/04 | ALISON GENDAR and NANCY DILLON

Posted on 10/18/2004 1:37:23 AM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 10/18/2004 2:53:02 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

The woman accusing Fox News host Bill O'Reilly of sexual harassment wants her life and career back, she told the Daily News yesterday.

Fox News officials ordered "The O'Reilly Factor" associate producer Andrea Mackris to stay out of the office as they moved to fire her.

Mackris said yesterday she is determined to stay in journalism even as her life has been upended.

"I love being a journalist. I never expected my life to take this acute left turn," she told The News yesterday.

Mackris, 33, has not set foot in Fox News since she sued the network's star commentator on Wednesday, alleging a string of "vile and degrading" sexual advances.

She said the scandal is an unwelcome detour that has disrupted her life and career.

"Fox told her not to come in," her lawyer David Ratner confirmed. "She hasn't been in since we started meeting with Fox."

Mackris did collect her regular paycheck on Thursday, sources said, but Fox has asked a judge to clear the way for her termination.

"We have asked the court to consider whether the allegations made public by Ms. Mackris are valid," said Fox spokeswoman Irena Briganti. "We have also asked the court to advise Fox News about the possible termination of Ms. Mackris' employment. Ms. Mackris is still employed by and on the payroll of Fox News."

In an explicit lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, Mackris claims that O'Reilly subjected her to phone sex against her wishes on three separate occasions in August and September.

She also contends O'Reilly previously told her to use a vibrator "to blow off steam," described his "amazing" endowment and recounted dalliances at a sex show in Thailand.

O'Reilly, 55, a married father of two, has teamed with Fox to file his own suit in Nassau County. He accuses Mackris and her lawyers of a politically motivated scheme to extort $60 million in "blood money."

He called Wednesday "the worst day of my life."

Mackris and her attorneys later updated their suit to charge that O'Reilly's Nassau complaint amounts to illegal retaliation.

"My logic in not going through the quote-unquote proper channels of Fox News' legal and Human Resources departments has been borne out in the retaliatory actions toward me since I came forward," Mackris said yesterday.

O'Reilly's wife, Maureen, meanwhile, kept mum yesterday as she pulled out of the family's Long Island driveway. "This is a private road," she said.

O'Reilly has hired private security to sit in front of his tony Plandome home. "He doesn't want anyone on his property," a silver-haired guard said.

Originally published on October 18, 2004



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: oreilly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: pete anderson
I refer you to your post #10:

If the tapes do exist as advertised it will at the very least show that O'Reilly was having an affair with this woman while he should have been spending time with his wife and two children.

41 posted on 10/18/2004 2:37:46 AM PDT by Judith Anne (First we were digital brownshirts then we were pajamahadeen, now we're the piranha of the internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: Gracey
This thread is getting UGLY as hell.

Quick - hire a lwayer Pete!

43 posted on 10/18/2004 2:42:26 AM PDT by Smoote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Hey I am really tired and am sorry for the confusion.

Please notice the words at the very least

I intended for at the very least to imply that between having an affair and harassing that woman that the former would be the least problem he may have.

And under no circumstances can I condone someone having an affair.

I am going the sleep now.

44 posted on 10/18/2004 2:42:56 AM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson

Good idea.


45 posted on 10/18/2004 2:43:40 AM PDT by Judith Anne (First we were digital brownshirts then we were pajamahadeen, now we're the piranha of the internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Smoote

No, I am not ugly now but will be when I roll into work at 8:00 ahh 8:30 in the morning.


46 posted on 10/18/2004 2:44:32 AM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: Caipirabob
Ah! So that's why "Irish eyes are smilin'". Knew it was something like that...

Is OReilly really Irish? What happened to the Curse of the Irish..

48 posted on 10/18/2004 3:02:01 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
These type of extremely ambitious women do exist in the corporate workplace I have seen it with my own eyes, and they do get what they want more often than not.

Men are cowed into submission by the PC monster they have created in the media and the universities.


BUMP

49 posted on 10/18/2004 3:03:11 AM PDT by tm22721 (In fac they)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson

O'Reilly is a married man...if I heard my husband talking to a woman he worked with about vibrators or admitting adultury at a sex club...I'd kill/divorce him! If this is true Bill is a hypocrite and a fraud.


50 posted on 10/18/2004 3:41:24 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy
If she has tapes then he is done

Tapes or other "evidence" are irrelevant. The company had a system in place for dealing with "sexual harrassment", and she chose to not only bypass safety protocols, but to encourage the "perpetration" of said "crimes".

51 posted on 10/18/2004 3:48:49 AM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
If this is true, Bill is a hypocrite and a fraud.

Yes, but that would not mean he's guilty of sexual harrassment in the workplace.

52 posted on 10/18/2004 4:01:18 AM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill
The alleged calls in the O'Reilly case were placed during normal working hours.

What are O'Reilly's "normal working hours"?

53 posted on 10/18/2004 4:05:17 AM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy
Anyone thinking BO'Re is done is dreaming! This will make his viewing audience even larger.

The only area where I believe he will be hurt is with his phoney baloney populist books.

54 posted on 10/18/2004 4:08:30 AM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill
All she had to do to mitigate her "damages" is hang up.

Bingo.

55 posted on 10/18/2004 4:11:05 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

"In addition, her boss at CNN (where she worked between jobs at Fox) was fired for sexual harassment. What does that tell you? "

This is very interesting. Is she a professional agitator of some kind?

If this is true; what was Bill thinking or not? What a shame because his mystery book is terrific.


56 posted on 10/18/2004 4:17:24 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; pete anderson
You are each talking apples and oranges; ergo the confusion -- it appears to me.

Yes, the woman should have either hung up on BOR; or reported these "harassment" incidences immediately.

Yes, also, if she has these on tape it would indeed show that a married man was harassing a co-worker.

What bores me? Stories like these are a dime a dozen. And usually brought up by Democrats WHENEVER they need a diversion. Frankly, I find the female producer to be a witless wonder for a) not effectively and promptly dealing with the so-called harassments WHEN THEY WERE HAPPENING; and b) if in fact BOR was messing with her; what an idiot in taste he might have had (in addition to the possible adultery issue).

All I'm hearing through all of this is: he said/she said... and RATINGS!

57 posted on 10/18/2004 4:19:16 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

I have no idea if she's a professional agitator, but think of the question if BOR is somehow brought down: Who benefits?

Frankly, I think she was just looking for a quick payoff and settlement out of court. I'm not wild about O'Reilly, but I admire him for fighting this.


58 posted on 10/18/2004 4:20:35 AM PDT by Judith Anne (First we were digital brownshirts then we were pajamahadeen, now we're the piranha of the internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy
If she has tapes then he is done

It would be impossible to "phone rape" somebody. If she found these calls so disgusting, she could have hung up. If they happened at all, the fact that she didn't hang up made it consensual.

59 posted on 10/18/2004 4:22:28 AM PDT by PistolPaknMama (Keep away from people who try to belittle your ambitions. Small people always do that -- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

I admire him for fighting this too.


60 posted on 10/18/2004 4:22:37 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson