Skip to comments.DID A NYTIMES "REPORTER" FABRICATE A BUSH QUOTE? (KERRY USED IT FOR A COMMERCIAL!)
Posted on 10/17/2004 6:08:39 PM PDT by hipaatwo
Kerry/Edwards/NYTimes campaign has launched another sleazy attack in an apparent effort to define just how low low really is.
First, the NY Times ran a Bush quote from an event the reporter did not attend, then within hours of the piece running, the Kerry campaign managed to put an ad together and have the press releases done and all the media reporting on it.
New Kerry Ad Exposes Bush's January Surprise - Social Security Privatization Just over two weeks before the election, the Kerry-Edwards campaign Sunday released a new ad revealing George Bush's real agenda - his intention to "come out strong" to privatize Social Security should he be sworn in for a second term. ... JOHN KERRY: "I'm John Kerry and I approve this message."
NARRATOR: "The truth is coming out... George Bush has finally admitted that he intends to privatize Social Security in a second term. 'I'm going to come out strong after my swearing in,' Bush said, 'with...privatizing of Social Security.'"
-- Bush at Private Luncheon: "I'm Going to Come Out Strong After My Swearing In With ... Privatizing of Social Security." "'I'm going to be real positive, while I keep my foot on John Kerry's throat,' George W. Bush said last month at a confidential luncheon a block away from the White House with a hundred or so of his most ardent, longtime supporters, the so-called R.N.C. Regents. ... 'I'm going to come out strong after my swearing in,' Bush said, 'with fundamental tax reform, tort reform, privatizing of Social Security.'" (Ron Suskind, "Without a Doubt," New York Times Magazine, 10/17/04)
There's only one problem. The reporter in question, Ron Suskind, did not attend the event he got the quote from. Further, it was not televised, it was a private event and there were no transcripts available. Yet he reports the quote as fact.
Suskind does not explain how he got the controversial quote so accurate but does say about an earlier quote "According to notes provided to me, and according to several guests at the lunch who agreed to speak..."
So Suskind got "notes provided to him" and that was good enough to run such an important quote. I hope Bill Burkett was not the source. Is this what passes for reporting at the Times today?
The Kerry/Edwards/NYTimes campaign has decided they can't convince voters with ringing endorsements so they'll scare old people to death.
For their part, the Bush campaign is denying the quote and some even claimed Suskind made the quote up from whole cloth. In the end, it is of little use, the media is running wild with the story, facts be damned.
--Oh, and who is Ron Suskind that the New York Times is having write a 10 (web) page story on Bush just days before the election? He is the author of "The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House and the Education of Paul O'Neill.''"
What do you think the odds are that the NY Times would let John O'Neil write a piece on John Kerry next Sunday?
Update: Jim Kouri is working this story for Wizbang and he has been in contact with Fox News who has questioned the Kerry camp. So far, Kerry is saying "Hey, it was in the NY Times". (paraphrased of course)
They were talking about this on Fox today...not a lot but I did hear it.....I think Carl Cameron said Kerry had found this "nich" and was going to town with it....
These guys will stop at nothing.. "despicable"
What is going to be done about it????
What is going to be done about it????
Who cares? The self-professed "mainstream media" (WSJ excepted) have so many liars in their midst I don't bother with them anymore -- and consider anyone who follows them to be an ignorant fool, or at least a "useful fool," to quote V.I. Lenin.
This hit piece from the NY Slime was the basis for all talking points of the demo scum attack on the talk shows and for the attacks from the street.
It's amazing how the NY Slime understands the details of a "secret plan" about Bush that doesn't exist but yet fails to publish any details about all the public plans that Kerry has announced (for which there are many).
This is the smear of the week and is oriented toward scaring elderly into choosing between buying catfood to eat, their prescription medicines or heating oil so they won't freeze to death.
This week is Social Security / Mediscare week. Same old nonsense as always. Not so many fall for this swill anymore.
But the NYT endorsed kerry. (sic)
Why would any Republican speak with a NY Times reporter without a recording device present?
Get it to the Media Research Center and all the talk radio guys/gals
Bob Woodward never lets that stop him. In fact, he can even relate what people are thinking.
I thought Kerry fixed Social Security in 1997.
All the news that's fit to print.
All the news that fits our agenda.
All the lies that fit our agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.