Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC letting utilities move into broadband
Washington Times ^ | October 15, 2004 | UPI

Posted on 10/16/2004 5:52:19 AM PDT by Lonely Bull

Washington, DC, Oct. 15 (UPI) -- U.S. regulators will let utility companies send high-speed Internet signals through electrical outlets to residential and business clients.

--SNIP--

The technology uses a special modem that plugs into electrical outlets and offers data at speeds of 1 to 3 megabits a second, comparable to broadband service over cable modems or conventional phone lines, though not as fast as the 5 megabits a second achievable through the residential fiber optic lines just now are being introduced by the Bell companies.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: broadband; fcc; fiberoptics; technology

1 posted on 10/16/2004 5:52:19 AM PDT by Lonely Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull

bttt


2 posted on 10/16/2004 6:01:08 AM PDT by nevergore (“It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull

I don't see how this is new. Broadband over power lines has been available and approved here in the Greater Cincinnati area for some time now, though the local utility company slow to roll out (CINERGY) and has not reached my area yet. The neat thing about the service is that one could move the modem to any outlet in the system and have broadband service. Eventually I see the utilities sharing through agreement that permit a user to go any other utility company that has a similar service.


3 posted on 10/16/2004 6:05:00 AM PDT by Investment Biker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull

This is great news! Now your ineffectual cable TV provider and your lackadaisical phone company will have some additional competition.

Look for this to get very interesting in rural areas where local electrical cooperatives might just decide to provide high speed internet service for little or no additional cost.


4 posted on 10/16/2004 6:05:26 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Rumors of the demise of the conservative Democrat have been greatly exaggerated....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

Broadband so cheap it can be metered. I can see the sky-high DSL and cable provider prices dropping over the long run to match that offered by utility companies.


5 posted on 10/16/2004 6:07:01 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Yeah, and I can see it happening soon. Apparently this is not a very expensive technology. And it will spread like wildfire in the rural areas where broadband is both difficult to obtain and expensive.


6 posted on 10/16/2004 6:12:08 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Rumors of the demise of the conservative Democrat have been greatly exaggerated....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull

Say bye bye to HF, amateur, and shortwave radio reception, coming to a receiver near you.


7 posted on 10/16/2004 6:15:11 AM PDT by asgardshill (Got a lump of coal? Tell Mary Mapes to 'shove it' - in 2 weeks you'll have a diamond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

This could be good news for our friends out in the countryside.


8 posted on 10/16/2004 6:19:51 AM PDT by Bahbah (Proud member of the pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Investment Biker
A decade ago, even phone co's were slow to get into Internet service because it meant equipment and line upgrades.

Cable sort of took over high speed because of the disinterest by phone co's. Also, there were regulations that disallowed phone modems from greater than 53k baud (IIRC). Phone co's did go with DSL in some areas.

A decade ago, co's considered the Internet a passing fad. Now, they are trying to play catch up--partly due to restrictions from outdates regulations and partly due to their having to upgrade their service and delivery aspects.
9 posted on 10/16/2004 6:26:23 AM PDT by TomGuy (His VN crumbling, he says 'move on'. So now, John Kerry is running on Bob KerrEy's Senate record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull

Apparently, it's been demonstrated that these signals interfere with HAM radios, emergency communications, etc. The article doesn't mention how or if the FCC reconciled this.


10 posted on 10/16/2004 6:44:58 AM PDT by Lord Basil (Hate isn't a family value; it's a liberal one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lord Basil

BPL has been tried in many Euro countries and turned out to be CPL (Crap over Power Lines). Rates slow down with more users, interference is horrible to radio spectrum users. After much of hype it was pulled out. How long will it take here to die? When you hear crap on your radio, complain to FCC. Today's car radios are terribly prone to out of band interference, just drive by the BC station and you will hear it everywhere on the dial.


11 posted on 10/16/2004 8:16:26 AM PDT by Leo Carpathian (Vote the RATS out!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
This is great news! Now your ineffectual cable TV provider and your lackadaisical phone company will have some additional competition.

This is terrible news! Now the radio dial will be polluted with noise from BPL installations. And, since BPL is a Part 15 device, it must accept any and all interference so when the shortwave skip comes in, BPL throughput plummets.

Rural America would be better served by 802.11 style point-to-point wireless networking.

12 posted on 10/18/2004 5:31:33 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek

>This is terrible news! Now the radio dial will be polluted with noise from BPL installations. And, since BPL is a Part 15 device, it must accept any and all interference so when the shortwave skip comes in, BPL throughput plummets.<

Bingo. And, won't this throw a real wrench into ham radio transmissions, Citizen's Band transmissions, etc.? Short wave radio is a very interesting source of overseas information. Will it still come in with the potential interference from BPL?


13 posted on 10/18/2004 10:11:32 AM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
And, won't this throw a real wrench into ham radio transmissions, Citizen's Band transmissions, etc.?

Yes, BPL has been shown to be very destructive to radio.

Short wave radio is a very interesting source of overseas information. Will it still come in with the potential interference from BPL?

Probably not effectively. Some stations will make it, others will be drowned in the beeps, buzzes, and squawks of BPL.

14 posted on 10/18/2004 12:29:24 PM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I can see the sky-high DSL and cable provider prices dropping over the long run to match that offered by utility companies.

I hope you are right. I do not like the price I pay for DSL service.

15 posted on 10/18/2004 12:32:06 PM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson