Posted on 10/16/2004 12:30:54 AM PDT by shibumi
Driving home from work tonight, I heard a spot on WLS in Chicago for the Terry O'Brien Sunday talk show. It seems her lead topic will be the less than honorable discharge many suspect Kerry received from the Navy. This is the first mention, to my knowledge, on the public airwaves regarding this subject. With persistent FREEPing, perhaps other media outlets will pick up the story.
None of that really makes me believe he was an informant. In fact, that is exactly what I would have expected Nixon to say. Kerry was gaining international exposure with the VVAW and work have been on the radar.
All I can say to that is....John Kerry is no Bill Clinton. :)
All I can say to that is....John Kerry is no Bill Clinton. :) ...........
Clinton lies like a rug but Kerry lies like a transparent rug with all the dirt under it clearly visable for all to see unless they close their eyes tightly.
Sure, it's not particularly likely, but there is *some* huge untold story behind Kerry's activities in that time; it's just amazing that if he truly did so many things that appear treasonous (i.e. talking surrender terms with North Vietnam!) he would still become a Senator.
It is also still a mystery to me how on earth he would get on the Dick Cavett show, soon after returning from the war, what was his significance? Then a month later we find he's in Paris talking to North Vietnamese leaders. He had a sponsor on one side or the other that is not being revealed, it would appear.
Could have been some sort of spy or informant, or could be (and still may be) part of a leftist effort that is not fully revealed.
Something is really off about Kerry, he has gotten away with way too much without being called on it. What made him teflon back then and what makes him teflon now?
Not only that, but the people who followed Clinton did so because they believed in him and liked him in spite of those flaws they knew he had. Kerry has no such following. People do not like him. The MSM is really picking up the slack for him but it is to protect the Dems, not Kerry. I suspect that down the road the MSM is going to bring him to his knees, but not until they have what they want from him.
Too bad he didn't. We wouldn't be dealing with him now. As for the suggestion that Kerry could have been an FBI informant, I'm just going by his character. He'd sell out his own mother for personal gain. integrity, integrity, integrity...or lack of
I have so little faith in the MSM that I don't think anything would come of it except more "Bush goes negative" stories. It is outrageous, I agree... but when I saw the AP suing to get Bush's military records, and nary a peep about Kerry's, it made me realize again how unbelievably biased the media is.
meek -re #54 - can you put the picture of F'n on their wall - like the pic of F'n in their museum of communist heros?
Waiting for more information.
I hope so. John O'Neil mentioned it in his statement.
ping
I agree. That is a good comment. Bush should ask it. And those in the media should ask it.
Its fair and professioal th way it is worded.
+ one N :)
He really should have been court martialed.
Surely President Bush already knows whether or not Sen. Kerry received an honorable discharge? Surely the President of the United States has access to individual military records? Surely the former Director of the CIA (and the former President Bush) has/had access to individual military records? If not, why not?
All that aside and regardless, Kerry needs to release his military records now! We must demand that he does so immediately! And we must keep demanding until he does so.
For beginners, I suggest we do so from a contact link at his website.
Write him something like this:
Honorable (gulp) Senator Kerry, there is an internet rumor that you initially received a less than honorable discharge from the Navy. President Bush has already released his military records to defend various claims against himself. This begs the question, why do you refuse to release yours? Could it be because initially you did actually receive a less than honorable discharge just as this internet rumor suggests? If not, then how else can it be explained (your refusal to release your military records) unless the rumor is true?
Sir (gulp), it is vital that you release your military records proving this rumor wrong. Please do so now or consider yourself (at least by me and millions of others) deemed someone who was discharged with less than an honorable discharge who is today attempting to become Commander in Chief of these United States. ...someone who has been deemed unfit for military service...someone who served in our military but whose service was less than honorable.
It's time to set the record straight. This nation has a right to know the military record of any man or woman who seeks to become Commander n Chief.
thank you in advance for the voluntary release of your military records.
your name
BTTT
Is there anyway to see his hair under "black light" ultra-violet light? If it's not living hair, "black light" will expose it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.