Sure, it's not particularly likely, but there is *some* huge untold story behind Kerry's activities in that time; it's just amazing that if he truly did so many things that appear treasonous (i.e. talking surrender terms with North Vietnam!) he would still become a Senator.
It is also still a mystery to me how on earth he would get on the Dick Cavett show, soon after returning from the war, what was his significance? Then a month later we find he's in Paris talking to North Vietnamese leaders. He had a sponsor on one side or the other that is not being revealed, it would appear.
Could have been some sort of spy or informant, or could be (and still may be) part of a leftist effort that is not fully revealed.
Something is really off about Kerry, he has gotten away with way too much without being called on it. What made him teflon back then and what makes him teflon now?
Could have been some sort of spy or informant, or could be (and still may be) part of a leftist effort that is not fully revealed.
Something is really off about Kerry, he has gotten away with way too much without being called on it. What made him teflon back then and what makes him teflon now?
Kerry seems to have been protected back in the 70s by Ted Kennedy for whom Kerry worked (at the age of 18 he was working in TK's office), and also by Senator Fulbright.
If you read a bit about Fulbright, it's obvious that he didn't have the best interests of the country at heart, and it's not a stretch to think he was promoting this war protester/VN veteran, who fit perfectly into efforts to stop the war at any cost.
Kerry had 2 powerful protectors, 2 US Senators, that's what it looks like to me.