Posted on 10/14/2004 7:55:37 AM PDT by Pete
Edited on 10/14/2004 10:48:42 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU OCT 14, 2004 10:58:04 ET XXXXX
DNC ELECTION MANUAL: CHARGE VOTER INTIMIDATION, EVEN IF NONE EXISTS
**World Exclusive**
The Kerry/Edwards campaign and the Democratic National Committee are advising election operatives to declare voter intimidation -- even if none exists, the DRUDGE REPORT can reveal.
A 66-page mobilization plan to be issued by the Kerry/Edwards campaign and the Democratic National Committee states: "If no signs of intimidation techniques have emerged yet, launch a 'pre-emptive strike.'"
[HIGHLIGHT OF ELECTION DAY MANUAL, NOVEMBER 2004. CLICK FOR IMAGE .JPG FILE]
The provocative Dem battle plan is to be distributed in dozens of states, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
One top DNC official confirmed the manual's authenticity, but claimed the notion of crying wolf on any voter intimidation is "absurd."
"We all know the Republicans are going to try to steal the election by scaring people and confusing people," the top DNC source explained.
Developing...
The Democrats will try to get all the illegal immigrants to flood the polls and demand to vote, and then claim intimidation and disenfranchisement when someone attempts to verify their registration. Also, there may be fraudulent registrations for ineligible voters, and when those voters show up they will claim intimidation.
Watch for it. It will happen.
-PJ
"There must be some serious moles at the DNC or could it be, there are honorable people there who don't appreciate being tied to a creep like Kerry.."
Which democrat benefits most from a Kerry loss? Which major democrat took himself out of play through elective surgery, sold as emergency surgery? BTW, Elvis is dead and Bill isn't feeling so well himself.
|
However, he's completely lost out on the zombie vote. They're a single issue voting block - braaains, BBrraaaiinnss!
I told my husband after the debate last night that after 8 years of Clinton I was positive that nobody could be worse in the White House. I was wrong, Kerry would be far worse IMO. God help us all if he is elected.
And so it begins.............(holding breath for MSM to report this -- NOT!!)
bttt
Not only is it not surprising, it is predictably desperate.
Seems Dem activists want to inflate their numbers in the upcoming election in the same way they have been inflating the "Kerry won" note in all the post debate online polls.
I believe it was Saul Alinsky who stressed the concept that anything goes if it gets you to your objective. According to Alinsky, even immoral or unethical actions are ok because, if your side wins, it can redefine the historical record and vindicate those actions as justifiable....
In other words, whine like little girls, as you did in 2000. :)
....the clintons' October surprise...maybe?....
"This all seems like a red herring to me to get our attention off of how badly BUSH is about to kick KERRY's butt."
You may have point there. But it could also be that they are just running scared.
Do you remember right after 9/11 and all the reports of prominent democrats who wouldn't go on record but were saying off the record, they were so glad Al Gore lost the election ???
I wonder if there are a few Dems who feel the same way about John Kerry ???
Hmmmmmmmmmmm
I can't get on Drudge either. First time in a long time I haven't been able to reach the site.
The DNC memo looks like it was typed with proportional spacing on an old IBM Selectric.
Check out "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" by Shirer.
This is playbook NAZI tactics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.