Skip to comments.
DANCING THREADS AND OTHER STUFF(VANITY!)
Uh???
| 10/13/04
| ForGod'sSake
Posted on 10/13/2004 2:47:11 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake
In an effort to stabilize loading threads, I have taken it upon myself to once again reiterate the proper procedure for posting pics. PUT THE DIMENSIONS(width and height attributes) IN THE IMG SRC HTML! Ahem, when you right click to get the properties for the pic, the attribute box also gives you the dimensions; wonder why? A typical IMG SRC link will look something like this:
<img src="PIC ADDRESS" width="xxx" height="xxx" >
Simple, huh? It's not difficult, so there may be some laziness going around???
Another pet peeve. I know some computers have the right click function disabled, so this is not necessarily for youse guys. BUT, for those that have the ability to copy and paste, is there any excuse for NOT including(in italics or otherwise) the pertinent part of the post you are replying to? It's frustrating occasionally to read a reply that doesn't make a whole lot of sense standing alone, ie, without the context of the "replied to" post.
That's it; carry on.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: allisvanity; andanotherthing; listenup; payattention; pickypickypicky; quantumphyisics; whydidthechicken
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: ForGod'sSake
Addendum: If you specify only height or width, the HTML apparently automatically preserves the aspect ratio of the photo. It's more reliable to specify only one.
For single photos, specify width.
For multiple side-by-side photos, it's better to specify height.
If you specify both, you stand a chance of doing this:
21
posted on
10/13/2004 3:07:32 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: cripplecreek
22
posted on
10/13/2004 3:08:04 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake
>>>Thereby reducing DANCING THREADS.
That does not bother me.
23
posted on
10/13/2004 3:08:54 PM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it - up.")
To: reagan_fanatic
What do you mean I'm biased?
24
posted on
10/13/2004 3:09:59 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(The economy won't matter if you're dead.)
To: Shermy
Understood. But in the interests of better thread loading, continuity, etc, do you think it's a good idea.....maybe?
FGS
25
posted on
10/13/2004 3:10:30 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: facedown
26
posted on
10/13/2004 3:10:55 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: woofie
27
posted on
10/13/2004 3:12:22 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake; Eaker
Kewl........Heh Eeeek Look actual size !!..Whooo Hooo !
Stay safe !
28
posted on
10/13/2004 3:13:46 PM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: ForGod'sSake
Your pic would look MUCH better like this:
29
posted on
10/13/2004 3:15:24 PM PDT
by
SquirrelKing
("I have to march because my mother couldn't have an abortion." - Maxine Waters (D-California)
To: ForGod'sSake
I have only used the dimensions if I wanted to alter the size (proportional) of a pic. You seem to imply that if I wished to post a pic without changing dimentions, I should enter the h/w dimension code anyway. I'm unfamiliar that would make a difference in loading times. But if true, you should argue that more. As a vanity goes, your's ain't bad, on second thought. Just so many of them lately. And all those "poll" threads! Cheers.
30
posted on
10/13/2004 3:15:53 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: r9etb
It's more reliable to specify only one. Heh,heh. Been there. Question, will it keep the thread from DANCING with only one attribute? Height, maybe?
FGS
31
posted on
10/13/2004 3:16:06 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: Keith in Iowa
That does not bother me. Well then, what do you do when responding to a specific reply on a thread with lots of graphics? You just wait it out? Maybe I'm just impatient.
FGS
32
posted on
10/13/2004 3:19:11 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake
Another whining vanity from someone with too much time on their hands.
I'm on a dialup, and yeah, sometimes the page dances, but I live with it.
Tell you what, how about you write a script that does it for you and give it to John Robinson?
33
posted on
10/13/2004 3:19:33 PM PDT
by
JoJo Gunn
(Help control the Leftist population - have them spayed or neutered.©)
To: ForGod'sSake
I'd rather play with this picture.(Less chance of scaring small children.)
34
posted on
10/13/2004 3:20:50 PM PDT
by
mollynme
(cogito, ergo freepum)
To: SquirrelKing
HUMINA!
Sorry about not referencing your text :^)
FGS
35
posted on
10/13/2004 3:23:32 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake
I have to agree with you about adding a snippet of the post you're relying to.
Tiny pet peeve.
Hardly worth mentioning.
:)
36
posted on
10/13/2004 3:24:51 PM PDT
by
MaryFromMichigan
(We childproofed our home, but they are still getting in)
To: Shermy
I'm unfamiliar that would make a difference in loading times. But if true, you should argue that more. I don't think it really makes any meaningful difference in load time, it just creates nervous threads when there are some graphics on it......the more there are, the worse it gets.
FGS
37
posted on
10/13/2004 3:26:57 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: JoJo Gunn
Another whining vanity from someone with too much time on their hands. Hey JoJo, don't you have something else you need to be doing???
FS
38
posted on
10/13/2004 3:30:12 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake
>>Well then, what do you do when responding to a specific reply on a thread with lots of graphics? You just wait it out? Maybe I'm just impatient.
There's really not much to wait out for me on a DSL connection.
It seems waht you are asking is for everyone else here to do something to accomodate you, and perhaps a small minority of others. What does that sound like to you?
39
posted on
10/13/2004 3:30:50 PM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it - up.")
To: counterpunch
It's "Unnngh!" Learn how to spell! :P
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson