To: Pukin Dog; sinkspur
There are parts later in the court papers that are in quotations & read like a transcript compared to the earlier pages that seem to be her recounting the incidents. Read the papers & decide for yourself.
775 posted on
10/13/2004 5:39:22 PM PDT by
Feiny
(Great minds think alike & fools seldom differ)
To: feinswinesuksass
There are parts later in the court papers that are in quotations & read like a transcript compared to the earlier pages that seem to be her recounting the incidents. Read the papers & decide for yourselfI did. She could be making every bit of that up. Remember Anita Hill and the pubic hair on the Coke can?
If she has tapes, there is the additional factor of the legality of taping someone without their knowledge in New York. If it's illegal, all of this is moot and she's guilty of extortion.
798 posted on
10/13/2004 5:49:54 PM PDT by
sinkspur
("I exist in the fevered swamps of traditional arcana. "--Cardinal Fanfani)
To: feinswinesuksass
I read the entire thing before I made my original post, unlike many who have commented on this thread. Just because the complaint USES quotations, and that some things read like a transcript does not make them so.
868 posted on
10/13/2004 6:53:01 PM PDT by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson