[sinkspur]

There are parts later in the court papers that are in quotations & read like a transcript compared to the earlier pages that seem to be her recounting the incidents. Read the papers & decide for yourself

I did. She could be making every bit of that up. Remember Anita Hill and the pubic hair on the Coke can?

If she has tapes, there is the additional factor of the legality of taping someone without their knowledge in New York. If it's illegal, all of this is moot and she's guilty of extortion.

[demkicker]

If she has tapes, there is the additional factor of the legality of taping someone without their knowledge in New York. If it's illegal, all of this is moot and she's guilty of extortion.

Let's cut to the chase. If this woman taped O'Reilly saying what she's accused him of, the smug one is toast. I don't care one wit about the legality of it, he's done. Granted, she may have plotted an entrapment case with recordings, but if those said recordings prove her case and her motive is monetary, so what? If true, the guy will be officially proved to be a pig, and yes, officially ruined.

If she doesn't have recordings however, the b*tch needs to be sued until she's penniless.