Posted on 10/13/2004 11:14:09 AM PDT by kerrywearsbotox
By Gene J. Koprowski United Press International
Published 10/13/2004 12:26 PM CHICAGO, Oct. 13 (UPI) -- President George W. Bush and Sen. John F. Kerry will walk across the stage Wednesday night and greet each other at the beginning of the third and final presidential debate. Already, across the country, e-mail messages are arriving in newsroom inboxes declaring a winner. A new form of spam is emerging this fall, called debate-spin spam, experts told UPI's The Web. The veracity of the e-mail messages being sent as letters to the editor is coming into question, as are the timing and content of many of the messages, because a significant percentage is being generated by bots, or intelligent software agents."In the world of politics, there are good bots and bad bots," said Christopher Faulkner, chief executive officer of C I Host, an online hosting service in Bedford, Texas. "There are hundreds of bots available for spamming or political use."For example, BotSpot.com makes available a bot known as "Mr. Smith E-Mails Washington," which occupies a high-profile in the computing community, because it is intended for consumers to use to e-mail members of Congress. Bots also can be customized quite easily, too, and can send out millions of messages in minutes. "For these political-action groups, many of them probably set up their own in-house servers," Faulkner told The Web. "All it takes is a little know how and a little bandwidth."During the first presidential debate, OpinionJournal.com, published by The Wall Street Journal, reported its letters editor received about 3,500 e-mails. The Washington Post wrote an editorial about the influx of e-mail it received, some declaring a winner to the debate before it had even commenced. E-mail sciencemail@upi.com
(Excerpt) Read more at upi.com ...
I doubt they're influencing elections. What the news media needs to do is refuse to put up silly internet polls on "Who won?" the debates.
Yes it is -- and paragraphs are our friend :-)
Why the emphisis on online poll voting? I never viewed them as scientific and if they sway heavily in either direction, especially when its about debates, I will scoff at it.
Anyone with half a brain can make this conclusion when surfing. Why the DNC makes this an important tool is beyond me
Any programmers out there who want to create a few bots and distribute them to the FR Army?
Come on I KNOW there are some coders reading this. Do the right thing and help s battle the liberal dirty tricks.
You've been here 2 weeks and already abused the "Post Article" button. :P
I don't think they are either. The polls after the last debate were so skewed, you knew they were just the democrats having a circle jerk.
If all of a sudden, the polls shifted 98% in Bush's favor, the media will disregard the poll.
Zot the bots!
Faulkner is an idiot.
There's no such thing as a "good" bot.
Bots are nonethinking, progammed automatons.
They don't even rise to the level of being subhuman.
"If all of a sudden, the polls shifted 98% in Bush's favor, the media will disregard the poll." --
LOL.. If the polls shifted any in Bush's favor, the media will disregard the poll.
I'm just glad that an MSM entity (UPI) has finally pulled its collective thumb out and informed its readers about "automated spin".
"I doubt they're influencing elections. What the news media needs to do is refuse to put up silly internet polls on "Who won?" the debates."
All that is needed is to enter the code listed on the page and the bots will be rendered useless.
That didn't stop the pundits from quoting them...Chrissy quoted the 70-30 win to his rat audience and the crowd went wild...he never said that the poll was suspect.
Actually I see many leftist attempting to use the "data" gathered from these tainted polls to form their arguments. Even though they know full well how manipulated the results are.
Anyone with half a brain can make this conclusion when surfing. Why the DNC makes this an important tool is beyond me
DNC makes it an important tool because if they bot the polls and get the MSM to announce Kerry won (by way of online polling results) then it energizes their party...that simple...they then want to convince Americans that Kerry is more presidential and a "winner"...debates are not what will make a great president it is their record,character..but for now they are doing anything to get their guy in office...desperate and crooked!
They are influencing the little girls in the media who want to be popular and spin debates in Kerry's favor. Nobody else is fooled.
Fortunately, the only polls that counts are in November.
Yup, that will make the DU-ers wet their knickers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.