To: Dan from Michigan
Peters doesn't support banning all guns. She supports licensing, registration, bans on some categories of guns - including high powered, rapid fire, and limits on amount of guns owned.No, just any gun with enough power to kill a tyrant would be banned from civilian ownership by Peters and her band of fools.
My screen name isn't just a name. It is a mindset and a way of life.
Here is a little quote from Henry Waxman:
"If someone is so fearful that, that theyre going to start using their weapons to protect their rights, makes me very nervous that these people have these weapons at all!"
HOW DARE WE THINK THAT WE CAN PROTECT OUR RIGHTS!
4 posted on
10/12/2004 9:12:33 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
I want the damn fools we call "politicians" to be worried about an armed citizenry. That was the whole idea and intent behind the 2nd. We see what happens in countries where the leadership is not afraid of the citizenry: Rwanda, Cambodia, Iraq, Sudan, Stalinist Soviet Union, the list goes on and on. This Peters woman is nothing but a handmaiden of Tyranny. She is clearly on the wrong side of history. And Democracy does not guarantee liberty; in fact, every true 'democracy' that ever was failed because the tyranny of the majority is still tyranny.
29 posted on
10/13/2004 12:15:17 PM PDT by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson