Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: teeman8r

Sincerely can't interpret his statement as having anything to do with an administrative appeal. There was clearly, IMHO, real vituperation in his tone. There was a nastiness. There was the reference to Sinclair "regretting this." This was no mere prediction of bureaucratic proceedings. It was a threat, an ugly one, plain and simple.

Of course you're entitled to your opinion, but it's a lonely one. Everyone else I've noticed on this thread who saw the segment, as well as the two FNC Special Report panelists who opined, deemed it a threat.


419 posted on 10/12/2004 6:20:52 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies ]


To: governsleastgovernsbest

wow. i must have seen a different segment than you did... it wasn't so ugly or threatening in the context it was given, in my opinion...

thanks for the civility of your reply, but i do believe the majority here are making a mountain out of a mole hill because they want to hear it a certain way.

chad has been quoted as saying, "they better hope we are not elected" and "they better hope we don't win" ...

i heard the latter in reference to an fec appeal... and i may be in the lonely minority, but majority jack bootedness is never a good place to be.

don't get me wrong, there is plenty to be disgusted about the kerry campaign without making stuff up.

teeman


459 posted on 10/13/2004 6:05:34 AM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson