l
s) adj. John Kerry.
Posted on 10/10/2004 1:26:50 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
Kerry: 'We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they're a nuisance'...
I think oolatec's point was made. Kerry didn't say terrorism is now a nuisance, but that he would accept it as it was pre 9/11. One belief is only slighty more stupid than the other.
Hewitt is already on it. Check out his website.
ls) adj. John Kerry.
The only way to do that is to kill as many of them in as gruesome a way as necessary to turn the rest of them into pacifists. You're not going to do THAT with a "Global Test".
Stupid pig faced SOB. They stopped on 9-1-1. How in the hell do you erase that day from history and our minds?
Are you saying that you have no, BeeGees music in your music library...
If the answer is yes,,,well done..
I mean no offence, BUT........
Could you please work on trying to be more clear in your posts. For the life of me, I can't tell where you stand on this stuff. It is not fair to the rest of us to have to spend the time required to determine what you really mean.
BTW...I completely agree!! LOL
You bloggers better jump on this if this is true! This could do it for Bush.
A nuisance is getting a call from a telemarketer during a meal or something. Having 3,000 people murdered on 9-11 was more than a nuisance, Mr. Kerry.
I heard that Kerry is quite fond of the GeeBee's especially the tune that he and Mama T danced to at their wedding, "How deep is your purse".
LOL! I also heard that Kerry likes the SNL skit SPROCKETS which is why he choose Edwards has his running mate, since he looks strangely like the host in that skit, actually I can see Edwards asking someone if they wanted to touch his monkey...
We have a WINNAH!
That's EXACTLY what he meant.
And it's not like there's no history behind the sentiment.
Consider Israel. That's been America's attitude about their endless terrorism until 9/11.
Consider Clinton. He regarded terrorism as a "law enforcement" issue and I ask you, isn't reducing terrorism to law enforcement like calling it just a pesky nuisance?
America was lucky on 9/11. I only wish more Americans would realize it. That was an attack that was fully intended to bring down the country. They were hoping our economy would dive, we'd have civil disturbance, we'd cower in our homes and be non-productive, we'd beg our government to take the ball and let's all go home.
There's another factor overlooked by Kerry's oh so cool and fluid misstatement...terrorism by its very nature tends to , well terrorize.
Now suppose there were, oh say, 8, well planned car bombs on November 2, that blow up right outside of a polling place? There would be some casualities but let's consider, those eight bombings would hit the American public on its election day with a greater grip that the DC snipers never knew.
Maybe 10 people would die, maybe 25 hurt. That's peanuts in a country this size. Yet such "nuisance" (assuming nuisance refers to casualties) terrorism can change the course of a nation's election.
In fact, I'll stop but I've tons more to say about this stupid statement that will bring this man down, it was because Clinton treated terrorism as a nuisance that caused 9/11.
Bush should hit on this hard during the next debate, and the election will be essentially locked up.
Nothing new. I've said and posted many times that liberals only care about sex and welfare and everything else and anything that might be expected as a responsibility is a nuisance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.