A VERY REAL CONSPIRACY

As an answer to every Bill Clinton indiscretion or any democratic anti-American policy blunder, Hillary Clinton made famous the phrase “right wing conspiracy”. There never was one of course, but it always accomplished the much needed diversion from the endless stream of Clinton scandals by shifting focus off of the immediate scandal, onto the imaginary conspiracy.

However, a very real conspiracy is underway in America today, it isn’t coming from those “nasty right wingers”, and the proof is all around us.

The Democratic Party has been promoting the idea that Republicans intend to steal the 2004 election. The rhetorical theory used to promote this idea is mass voter suppression. The rhetoric reached such a fever pitch that Democrats demanded and received outside international monitoring of the upcoming election, as if we were some third world country struggling with our first election, a move that may forever change our national sovereignty concerning the U.S. election process, and not for the better.

What if I told you that this was no accident? That an evil mastermind who became one of the world’s richest men by crippling the economies of countless nations around the globe, was using his ill gotten billions to control American policy by positioning himself to control the man in the White House?

What if I told you that this evil man has an evil plan for America, a plan that was designed to weaken America by legalizing illicit drug use, promoting free abortions coast to coast, attacking the traditional family unit, abolishing religious speech and gun rights, installing a socialist form of government, outlawing capitalism, and subjecting the governance of the United States to a one world order, under a one world court?

This man exists, his name is George Soros, this is his history, these are his plans, and you better read his book, The Bubble of American Supremacy.

What if I told you he was able to infiltrate one of the two major U.S. political parties, aligning himself with powerful party operatives, buying their loyalty at a time when they would otherwise be given no power at all by the American people through the normal election process?

What if I told you he was able to do so by first successfully pushing for campaign finance reform, then immediately circumventing that reform legislation through a carefully designed web of 527 shadow party organizations set up to outspend and overpower the legitimate election process?

Well he has, his co-conspirators include noteworthy political operatives like Morton H. Halperin, Leslie Gelb, Daniel Ellsberg, John Podesta; Jeremy Rosner, Steven Rosenthal, and others. If you don’t know who these people are, I suggest you search them immediately; they are all part of the far left wing of the Democratic Party, and all powerful party insiders.

Soros was one of the major supporters of campaign finance reform that culminated in the passage of McCain-Feingold, and then the first to circumvent that law through shadow party organization that include 527’s America Coming Together, The Media Fund, MoveOn.org, Center for American Progress, America Votes, Joint Victory Campaign 2004, and The Thunder Road Group, just to name a few.

Most American’s believe these to be innocent grass roots campaign “get out the vote” type efforts led by average concerned American’s, but nothing could be further from the truth. All of these organizations are shadow party groups funded and controlled by George Soros and his band of socialist brothers.

What if I told you that mainstream news rooms across America were working in tandem with these organizations, their backers, and the DNC Kerry Campaign by shaping the headlines to suit the purposes of this so-called “progressive” agenda, in a clear cut attempt to advance their common cause of a socialist America?

If you hadn’t noticed before, it should be clear after watching the events of “memogate” unfold at CBS, involving one of America’s most respected news casters Dan Rather, and his accomplished producer, Mary Mapes.

If that doesn’t convince you, maybe comments from Peter Jennings and Tom Brokaw’s defense of Rather and Mapes will, both of whom are more angered by the fact that CBS was caught, than what CBS did, both of whom are more concerned with what they term “White House attempts to smear Dan Rather” than Dan Rather’s fraudulent attempt to smear a sitting war time President.

What if I told you that the international monitors being brought in to oversee the 2004 Presidential election were corrupt left wing operatives themselves, also interested in removing Bush from office in an effort to bring America to its knee’s in the world community? They are…

What if I told you that an attempt to steal this election is underway, not by anyone’s effort to suppress votes, but rather to count illegal fraudulent votes being manufactured by the Democratic “get out the vote” effort, heavily concentrated in Democratic precincts and American prisons? It is…

What if I told you that the Democratic Party has hired 25,000 attorney’s focused on 17 battleground states where the DNC hopes the vote is close enough to challenge, for the purpose of forcing unsuspecting local election volunteers to accept every voter, legitimate or not? They have…

What if I told you that the Democratic ticket, John Kerry and John Edwards, along with all of these co-conspiracy efforts were publicly supported, in part designed by both the Socialist and Communist Parties based right here in the good old United States of America? They are!

And what if I told you that the mainstream press has no intention of reporting any of this, but rather to continue undermining the President, the war on terror, and the U.S. economy in order to assist with the election of John Kerry?

What if I told you that a vote for John Kerry and John Edwards was a vote to support all of this evil activity, against the will of more than 80% of the troops serving in battle today, and at odds with every soldier who has ever given his life for the freedom’s and liberties we so freely abuse today?

What if I told you that more than 40% of the American voting population intends to do just that? This would be the conspiracy of all conspiracies, wouldn’t it?

What if I told you that the Kerry campaign, the national media, and international terrorists are helping each other? They are, every time terrorists strike, the Kerry camp cranks up their anti-war rhetoric, the national press only covers those attacks, none of the rest of the story, resulting in shaken U.S. resolve and support for the war on terror, and terrorists are rewarded for their efforts. The defeat of their strongest opponent, George W. Bush, being their ultimate goal.

The problem is its ALL true, every last word of it, every supporting link, every accusation, and every piece of this sorted puzzle. It isn’t just a conspiracy theory, it is a real life massive conspiracy intended to unseat Bush at any cost, and bring American power down to a level acceptable to the balance of the world.

The world, in particular members of the EU, is not happy with only one remaining superpower, even when it is America, who has liberated more than 70 countries, including most of the EU nations, and has fed the world for decades.

Well, you are the only one who can stop it! By helping to make certain this information reaches the American people, and by casting your vote to defeat these efforts.

No amount of money, no amount of wishing or waiting will make it go away. Only your vote can stop it. Soros supporters will be there November 2nd, every last one of them, even those who have no idea what they are supporting, and don’t want to know.

From this point on, quotes from the U. S. Constitution will be in boldface type and quotes from The UN Charter will be in italic.

Let us begin with a look at the preambles of the two documents.

"We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure Domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common Defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this CONSTITUTION for the United States of America."

"WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS DETERMINED to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, AND FOR THESE ENDS to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbours, and to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security, and to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples, HAVE RESOLVED TO COMBINE OUR EFFORTS TO ACCOMPLISH THESE AIMS."

Note the brevity and simplicity of the Preamble to the U. S. Constitution. Note its limited scope. Note the Constitution is not one of the United States, but is for the United States.

Then look at the verbosity of the Preamble to the UN Charter. Note the arrogance of the opening statement -- here are men determined to abolish war -- which God tells us we are going to have. Note the emphasis on humanity and the introduction of the concept of "equality," concepts that might have been lifted right out of the Humanist Manifesto. One might think it was anticipating the civil rights/women's rights/homosexual rights movements. Note the emphasis on international treaties and international law and the promotion of social progress. Note the introduction of tolerance and the agreement to accept certain unnamed principles and methods. Note the concept of using government to promote social and economic advancement.

Can you see the difference? The U. S. document talks about a Constitution to guide the states, the UN document talks about an organization to control the nations.

When we get into the texts of the Constitution and the Charter we find one glaring difference: the representatives from the states who make up the Congress (our governing body) are elected by the people and are therefore accountable to them and can be replaced by them, as is the Chief Executive or President. No such provision exists in the UN Charter. The Security Council is composed of appointed men and women from the various countries. They are in effect accountable to the persons who appointed them. The General Assembly also is composed of appointed individuals from the participating countries -- Governing Bodies that have no accountability to the people -- a situation begging for abuses.

Chapter X of the UN Charter establishes and defines the duties of The Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. Our Constitution has no provisions for such a body, since it leaves such matters in the hands of the individual states.

Article 68 of the UN Charter states: "The Economic and Social Council shall set up commissions in economic and social fields and for the promotion of human rights, and such other commissions as may be required for the performance of its functions."

Many of the thousands of UN conference reports and recommendations can be traced to such activities.

While the UN Charter itself does not address the issue of religious freedom, the UN Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance Based on Religion or Belief states in Article 1, Section 3: "Freedom to manifest one's religion or belief may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law..."

Contrast this to the first clause of our First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;..."

Where our Constitution guarantees no law restricting one's practice of his religion, the UN offers only such restrictions as are prescribed by law -- meaning whatever restriction the state wants to place on it.

Our Second Amendment says: "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

Article 26 of the UN Charter states, in part: "...the Security Council shall be responsible for formulating, with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee referred to in Article 47, plans to be submitted to the Members of the United-Nations for the establishment of a system for the regulation of armaments." This has been construed to include the regulation of armaments owned by the citizenry of the nations, and if covered by a treaty we might become party to could be used to override the Second Amendment and impose UN gun control on Americans.

Article 17 of the UN Charter states: "2. The expenses of the Organization shall be borne by the Members as apportioned by the General Assembly." In other words, the UN General Assembly may impose a "tax" on the people of the United States based on the whim of the majority of those making up the General Assembly, where there is no veto¹ power.

Compare this to Section 8 of Article 1 of our Constitution, which says: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States: ..." It then goes on to enumerate the powers granted for which money may be raised and spent. This enumerating of powers is one of the unique features of our Constitution, which was, as one of our founders said, to bind down the federal government and hold it in check. Essentially that was the main purpose of the Constitution -- to limit the power and scope of the federal government and to protect the sovereignty of the states.

Note that duties, imposts and excises must be applied equally to the states. The wealth of a state could not be taken into account, but population could. Taxes could not be imposed on individuals until the Sixteenth Amendment became effective on February 25, 1913.

The UN takes the position that the wealthiest countries must pay the greatest portion of the cost of running the Organization. This is the Marxist principle of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need." It might sound good in theory but it never works in practice. It is using government to level or homogenize society and is substituting government controls for God ordained freedoms. It is the basis of slavery.

Section 7 of Article 1 of our Constitution states: "All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; ..." This provision gives the purse strings of the nation to the "people's house," the body considered by our Founding Fathers to be the most powerful and the one nearest to the people and more under their control. (Originally Senators were appointed by the Governors of the states, not elected by the people.) The House of Representatives continues to have this power and could negate the effects of any bill or program simply by not voting funds to implement it.

Article 1 of the UN Charter states: "3. To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion; and 4. To be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends."

This statement grants the UN broad authority to involve itself in almost any aspect of human life, a continuation of the arrogance displayed in the Charter's Preamble.

Our Constitution has no similar statement. Indeed, it reflects the founders' views that such functions were not the business of a federal or central government, but were best left to the states and local communities.

Contrast our Tenth Amendment with Article 10 of the UN Charter.

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." As anyone but a Congressman of a Federal Judge can easily understand, only powers specifically delegated to the federal government by the Constitution are federal powers. This was the attempt our founders made to try to bind the federal government with the chains of the Constitution.

Article 10 of the UN Charter: "The General Assembly may discuss any questions or any matters within the scope of the present Charter, [and we see from Article 1 that this covers just about anything imaginable] or relating to the powers and functions of any organs provided for in the present Charter, and, except as provided in Article 12, may make recommendations to the Members of the United Nations or to the Security Council or to both on any such questions or matters." While the word "recommendations" is used in this Article, recommendations become mandates when they are inserted into Treaties or Conventions that are then ratified by member nations.

The Democratic Party's Destruction of America!

Source of post:
Current Communist Goals

Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35

January 10, 1963
Current Communist Goals
EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Thursday, January 10, 1963

[From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]

CURRENT COMMUNIST GOALS

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

SOVIET CONSTITUTION	UNITED NATIONS DECLARATION
Article 118: Citizens of the USSR have the right to work.	Article 23: Everyone has the right to work.
Article 120: Citizens of the USSR have the right to maintenance in old age and also in case of sickness or disability. This right is insured by the extensive development of social insurance of industrial, office and professional workers at state expense; free medical service for the working people; and the provision of a wide network of health resorts for the use of the working people.	Article 25: Everyone has the right to . . . medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age, or other lack of livelihood.
Article 119: Citizens of the USSR have the right to rest and leisure.	Article 24: Everyone has the right to rest and leisure.
Article 122: [Guarantees] State protection of the interests of mother and child, State aid to mothers of large families and to unmarried mothers, maternity leave with full pay, and the provision of a wide network of maternity homes, nurseries, and kindergartens.	Article 25 (2): Motherhood and Childhood are entitled to special care and assistance.
Article 126: Citizens of the USSR are guaranteed the right to unite in . . . trade unions.	Article 23 (4): Everyone has the right to . . . join trade unions.
Article 121: Citizens of the USSR have the right to education.	Article 26: Everyone has the right to education.