Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Citizens can Broadcast Political Ads within 60 Days of Elections and Can Have Web Ads As Well
Slate ^ | April 25, 2002` | Mickey Kaus

Posted on 10/09/2004 2:15:36 PM PDT by Oakleaf

Everyone Was Wrong About McCain-Feingold! We all missed a giant loophole in the law.

I was wrong about the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law. The New York Times was wrong. Peter Beinart was wrong. And E. J. Dionne was wrong, too!

We all missed an important wrinkle in the new law—important because understanding it reveals a gaping hole in the bill, a hole the bill's legal defenders (if you ask them) freely admit exists.

Necessary background: Along with many others, I criticized McCain-Feingold for banning last-minute TV and radio ads sponsored by nonprofit advocacy groups even when those ads were paid for by individual citizens (and not by profit-making corporations or unions). This ban, it seemed to me, violated the principle—embodied in the Supreme Court's key Buckley v. Valeo ruling—that American citizens should be free to band together and spend their own money saying what they think about politicians when it matters most (i.e., just before an election).

It might be OK to restrict spending by corporations and unions, in this view. It might be OK to limit contributions to the campaigns of candidates. But if you want to spend your own money, independent of a candidate's campaign, to express your views—well, it's a free country. Or should be.

Here's the wrinkle: It turns out the new law's ban on last-minute ads only applies to corporations. True, most nonprofit "advocacy" groups—such as the Sierra Club and the ACLU—are corporations. But (and this is the point I didn't understand) they don't have to be. It's perfectly possible to form a simple unincorporated association and still get nonprofit tax status. (You just have to show that your articles and bylaws meet IRS requirements.) And if you're not incorporated, then McCain-Feingold's ad ban doesn't apply.

Article URL: http://slate.msn.com/id/2064730/

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ads; bush; campaign; campaignfinance; cfr; election; elections; gopclub; kaus; mccainfeingold; politics; senate; ussenate2004
If I'm reading this article from Slate correctly both citizens and UNincorporated associations can broadcast political ads within 60 days of an election. Check it out and see if I've got this correct. (N.B. Standard disclaimer I'm not a lawyer, don't do this without consulting a lawyer, if get you get sued by FEC it ain't my fault.)

I also called the FEC and asked about citizen ads on the Web. The polite Federale there said that any citizen can advertise for any candidate in any election on the Web within the 60 day limit. The only provisio is that you, as "Any Other Person" have to file a FEC From 5 if you spend more than $250 in a given election year. (See http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/indexp.htm and also http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/elctioneering.htm).

It seems then that one could still a) set up a website for Bush/Cheney, for your state Senate or Houre race or for State races and promote those candidates until the election and b) an UNincorporated association MIGHT be able to get MSM ads.

Does anyone know if I've got this right? Has anyone confirmed this or done this?

1 posted on 10/09/2004 2:15:39 PM PDT by Oakleaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oakleaf

Houre should be House! (Arrrggh...).


2 posted on 10/09/2004 2:17:19 PM PDT by Oakleaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oakleaf

That is correct. And, I have GOOD ads ready to go if anyone wants to help out with $:

http://www.naspino.com/media/

Ignore ad#7 -- it's out of date. The rest are all good.


3 posted on 10/09/2004 2:18:05 PM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oakleaf

Nobody overlooked this. It has been obvious since the very start.


4 posted on 10/09/2004 2:18:32 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oakleaf; Congressman Billybob

I'm submitting this to One Who Knows A Boatload

CBB? is this article on the square?


5 posted on 10/09/2004 2:18:55 PM PDT by King Prout (yo! sKerry: "Live by the flip, die by the flop." - Frank_Discussion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
ah... I may need to give something over to your care.
6 posted on 10/09/2004 2:22:03 PM PDT by King Prout (yo! sKerry: "Live by the flip, die by the flop." - Frank_Discussion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oakleaf

Another apparent loophole is the "qualified nonprofit corporation" or MCFL type, see www.nrlc.org/news/2004/NRL01/prolife_challenge.htm. This is really complicated and will probably require a passel of lawyers to make sure you're okay but it also looks interesting for 501(c)(4) groups.


7 posted on 10/09/2004 2:24:20 PM PDT by Oakleaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

LOL!!!


8 posted on 10/09/2004 2:24:46 PM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

if I can make it (or the frames for it - that I can do) can you (animate it if need be and) get it "out there"?


9 posted on 10/09/2004 2:30:16 PM PDT by King Prout (yo! sKerry: "Live by the flip, die by the flop." - Frank_Discussion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

It wasn't obvious to me. I just found out about this and thought it would be helpful to spread the word, maybe someone can make use of this info in the next weeks.


10 posted on 10/09/2004 2:39:59 PM PDT by Oakleaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oakleaf

*nod* Someone might.


11 posted on 10/09/2004 2:42:34 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oakleaf
The FEC issued regulations in this area to allow true non-profit corporations and organizations to run their ads. However, those regulations were struck down a week ago as unconstitutional.

So it can truly be said that nobody, including the FEC, knows for sure what is constitutional (or not) in this area.

Since I have been committed for months to run TV ads here in North Carolina to stick a thumb in the eye of the FEC, I intend to do exactly that. Starting a week from now. Click the SECOND link below for information on that.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "America Fails the 'Global Test' "

If you haven't already joined the anti-CFR effort, please click here.

12 posted on 10/09/2004 2:44:45 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
See post #12, here.

Billybob

13 posted on 10/09/2004 2:46:17 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

thanks!


14 posted on 10/09/2004 2:52:27 PM PDT by King Prout (yo! sKerry: "Live by the flip, die by the flop." - Frank_Discussion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Oakleaf
BTW, I forgot to mention that anyone can do anything with web ads under McCain-Feingold. It forbids "broadcast" ads, but the Internet is not "broadcasting."

Congressman Billybob

15 posted on 10/09/2004 2:54:07 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Whew! This is why I love this place (I lurked since about 99 before I joined). Thanks for your information and best of luck!


16 posted on 10/09/2004 2:58:20 PM PDT by Oakleaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson