Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will boycott damage the Afghan vote? [polling peaceful, challengers coordinate boycott]
BBC ^ | Oct 9, 2004 | Sanjoy Majumder

Posted on 10/09/2004 1:14:23 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko

First things first - Afghanistan's first ever democratic elections were largely peaceful.

This in a country still under the threat of violence from the Taleban, private militias and sparring warlords.

And large numbers of Afghans turned out to cast their ballots including, in many areas, many women.

But a sudden move to boycott the polls by all the candidates opposed to President Karzai has threatened to cast its shadow over what has clearly been a remarkable process.

It followed fairly widespread complaints of voting irregularities - specifically that the indelible ink used to mark voters' fingers and prevent them from casting their vote again could easily be washed off.

Officials from the Joint Electoral Management Body - made up of Afghan and UN officials - were quick to react and pronounce judgement after an investigation.

"The problem is not with the ink itself but its application," said the JEMB's head, Farook Wardak.

But the matter had deeply embarrassed the JEMB and the UN, with many questioning how millions of dollars could be spent on an election yet something as elementary be overlooked.

My BBC colleague and veteran Afghan watcher Lyse Doucet put it succinctly:

"This was an election which was supposed to have been undone by international terrorism.

"Yet it's all come down to a pot of ink."

The controversy has, however, come as a lifeline to the disparate opposition which had made several failed attempts to jointly oppose the president.

They can now question the outcome of the poll, which Mr Karzai is widely expected to win.

It could potentially make the president's attempts to extend his political reach over this deeply divided country that much more difficult.

Democratic spirit

Despite the controversy, reports from the ground by BBC correspondents spread across Afghanistan suggest that the issue has had little impact among voters.

Many Afghans are keen that the international community appreciate just what a historic day it has been for this country.

"It is amazing, as an Afghan, to see the turnout, see how many people have come out to cast their votes - especially as it was an exercise that was new to them," says Shoaib Sharifi, a senior Afghan journalist.

It's a view that many voters concurred with.

"This is a country that has suffered greatly over the years," said Abdul Mateen, a Pashtun taxi driver, after casting his vote in the city's diplomatic district.

"To be able to cast my vote and participate in the future of my country - this is a dream to be cherished."

Across Kabul, in the Tajik-dominated Karte Parwan district many felt the opposition had done the right thing by boycotting the polls.

But restaurant manager Mohammad Daud, a Panjshiri Tajik, felt the time had come to move on.

"It is time we started thinking as Afghans and do what's best for the country.

"We should stop thinking and acting along ethnic lines. What has happened today is remarkable."

It is still early to determine the impact of the poll boycott on the outcome of these elections and the future of Afghanistan's democratic experiment.

There are some who believe that Saturday's development will mean that President Karzai, who is expected to win, will earn a discredited mandate which in turn will hurt his political strength and ability to extend his influence across the country.

But most people look on the day as an incredibly positive moment for a country that has had so little to celebrate.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanelection; afghanelections; afghanistan


Women vote in Shiberghan, northern Afghanistan



Refugee voters in the Iranian capital, Tehran

1 posted on 10/09/2004 1:14:23 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

"But the matter had deeply embarrassed the JEMB and the UN, with many questioning how millions of dollars could be spent on an election yet something as elementary be overlooked. "

UN involvement? Hmmmmmmmm.....

I wonder where the money went.....

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm


2 posted on 10/09/2004 1:17:06 PM PDT by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Seems to be a theme. Parties & candidates who know they're going to lose boycott and appeal to the UN. Happened in Russia and now Afghanistan.


3 posted on 10/09/2004 1:21:11 PM PDT by JohnnyZ ("Jim, you've got to do in a way that passes the test, that passes the global test" - JFnK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
From the National Post of Canada:

"The opposition candidates, meeting at the house of Uzbek candidate Abdul Satar Sirat, signed a petition saying they would not recognize the results because the glitches with ink opened the way for widespread fraud."

So ... all 15 candidates decided independently to call for a boycott, and just happened to show up in one spot for the announcement?
4 posted on 10/09/2004 1:25:59 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko (Did IQs just drop sharply while I was away?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
The Wonderful & Wacky World Of Politics is warmly embracing the Afghan people. Welcome and fasten your seat belts!
5 posted on 10/09/2004 1:30:26 PM PDT by Earnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Better boycott than bullets.


6 posted on 10/09/2004 1:31:32 PM PDT by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

But...but...Teresa said that the Taliban was back in control of Afghanistan.


7 posted on 10/09/2004 1:34:16 PM PDT by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

I think she must have meant "Little Piggies"


8 posted on 10/09/2004 1:36:22 PM PDT by Earnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
"The opposition candidates, meeting at the house of Uzbek candidate Abdul Satar Sirat, signed a petition saying they would not recognize the results because the glitches with ink opened the way for widespread fraud."

Ah, the old Al Gore Gambit.

9 posted on 10/09/2004 1:43:32 PM PDT by Ichneumon ("...she might as well have been a space alien." - Bill Clinton, on Hillary, "My Life", p. 182)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

We need to send a delegation of democrats to teach the afghanis some voter fraud techniques... Chicago Style!!


10 posted on 10/09/2004 2:24:07 PM PDT by rennatdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
Where is that Grinning Anti American Imbecile Carter?? After all He has a hand in the creation of the Talaban anyway.
11 posted on 10/09/2004 2:34:42 PM PDT by Fast1 (Mullah Kerry for an Islamic America..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fast1

Taliban


12 posted on 10/09/2004 2:35:22 PM PDT by Fast1 (Mullah Kerry for an Islamic America..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson