One leads to anarchy the other to communism and with both a society can not remain free and intact.
There are several ways that anarchy can come about, but anarchy is the step before communism/dictatorship.
It is the desire of the socialists in our country to create anarchy such that they can step in with a communist/dictatorship type of government. In the case of the socialists, anarchy would result from the total chaos of a true democracy with no formal leadership or regimented form of government.
Is it still a moral choice on your part if someone puts a gun to your head and says "or else"? Not in any ones world but your twisted little fantasy world.
Lady Heron wrote: What a joke, they think they are the only ones who live by the Constitution but ignore what the founding fathers knew about morals upholding the Constitution.
Reply: How could I forget. The Republican Party is the one with morals right?
Let me remind you... Bush is the one fighting for free and fair elections overseas. Yet, he refuses to participate in free and fair elections here at home.
He is our President yet he refuses to acknowledge to the will of the people (of which 57% have said they want 3rd parties in the debates). Why? Because he doesn't want to hear other alternatives to his programs and his ideas.
Where are Bush's morals? He will send people to fight and die, but won't give them a chance to voice their opinions?
Did any of you read what Bush's campaign spokesperson said last week? His name is Danny Diaz, and I quote: "This race is between the President of the United States and John Kerry. The voters will choose between those two candidates."
We will? And what if we don't? What then?